@cnrsbiologie.bsky.social @upcite.bsky.social @ijmonod.bsky.social
11.04.2025 12:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@vdoye.bsky.social
@cnrsbiologie.bsky.social @upcite.bsky.social @ijmonod.bsky.social
11.04.2025 12:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🔍 Our hypothesis: the structural integrity of the nuclear pore scaffold, which exhibits a certain elasticity, plays a protective role for the nuclear envelope. This may explain why genetic diseases linked to some nuclear pore components only target specific cell types or organs
11.04.2025 12:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Their trick: a 3D template matching approach to push cryo-electron tomography beyond classical subtomogram averages and analyze individual pores complexes.
11.04.2025 12:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Have a look at the unexpected architecture of nuclear pores without Nup133: altered symmetries, incomplete ring assemblies and a trend to dismantle giving rise to large openings upon neural differentiation ⬇️
11.04.2025 12:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0👏 Congratulation to Reiya Taniguchi for the impressive work and to @corniacki.bsky.social who initiated this collaboration.
11.04.2025 12:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0✍️Our collaborative project with the @becklab.bsky.social (@mpibp.bsky.social) and the Kräusslich lab who applied innovative ultrastructural analyses to analyze nuclear pores in Nup133-/- embryonic stem cells and neural progenitors is now out @naturecomms.bsky.social!
🔗 www.nature.com/articles/s41...