I was on a panel last week where I was posed the question, "how are you going to get us out of our cars?" The audience was made up of several hundred developers and real estate brokers. I basically said, "I'm focused on the 80%, not you." 1/2
03.03.2026 04:03 —
👍 29
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 0
From the last Gilded Age to the present one, elite disinterest remains one of the greatest barriers to great and inclusive public transit. This 1929 ad makes the same argument we must make today. 1/
02.03.2026 18:26 —
👍 64
🔁 13
💬 3
📌 1
Looking at it …
28.02.2026 17:23 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Great new initiative to develop better messaging around the value of good urban planning, led by @brenttoderian.bsky.social, @grantennis.bsky.social and
@tomflood.bsky.social.
24.02.2026 18:05 —
👍 24
🔁 9
💬 2
📌 1
The City Where Free Buses Changed Everything
New York’s new mayor Zohran Mamdani has said he’ll make every bus free to ride. This French city did just that — and is reaping the rewards.
Come on, @planetizen.bsky.social!
Dunkerque, France is not a good model for free fares in New York City! The math is different in such small cities. When Paris or London do free fares citywide, that will really be news.
www.planetizen.com/features/136...
19.02.2026 14:34 —
👍 42
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 1
A bad but universal metric of public transit reliability is the % of a line that is in its own lane.
It is easy to create exclusive lanes where there is little delay, but not at the bottlenecks where they matter most.
So this metric says nothing about speed or reliability.
19.02.2026 14:27 —
👍 68
🔁 6
💬 3
📌 1
The Humanities Are About to Be Automated
AI can now write convincing academic papers. There’s no more room for denial.
I want to believe that AI can't replace human philosophers, theorists, or historians.
But this scholarly paper about AI's distinctive threat to democracy is very good, and an AI wrote it with only minimal prompting ...
writing.yaschamounk.com/p/the-humani...
18.02.2026 20:37 —
👍 6
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 1
In the Colombian town of El Carmen de Viboral, where I seem to be the only tourist, evidence of Canadian soft power.
18.02.2026 15:57 —
👍 39
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
Zeno's paradox of editing: every time you proofread your work, you'll find half the remaining errors.
17.02.2026 11:35 —
👍 66
🔁 4
💬 2
📌 0
I am not following this at all. You're going to have to explain how the New York situation is relevant to Chicago.
15.02.2026 17:38 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Tallinn's free fares moved people from active modes to public transit, but didn't reduce car use. A few people got shorter walks in the snow, which is nice for them, but this was a very expensive way to deliver that.
15.02.2026 17:00 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
No, this is not like the Chicago situation at all. New York MTA is all one agency and it doesn't matter much to them whether fares are collected on the subway or the bus. The problem is that pushing people from subway to bus encourages more wasteful network design.
15.02.2026 16:58 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Opinion | Something Surprising Happens When Bus Rides Are Free
Sorry, but this @nytimes.com op-ed on free fares in New York City, by @galvinalmanza.bsky.social, is deeply ignorant of the issues.
It proposes that pretty social justice vibes and some careless citations will change facts of math. Thread: 1/
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/o...
14.02.2026 14:33 —
👍 92
🔁 37
💬 6
📌 7
I like Zohran Mamdani and wish him every success. I'm one of many transit experts who would have supported him despite this one bad idea. But the @nytimes.com needs to start listening to actual transit experts, instead of trying to shout us down with well-meaning social justice vibes. 8/8
14.02.2026 14:38 —
👍 70
🔁 4
💬 4
📌 0
The only way to avoid that outcome is to imagine some new funding source that will appear in response to the beauty of the free fares vision, but any such funding source would be better spent on service, regardless of whether the goal is ridership or access to opportunity. 6/
14.02.2026 14:36 —
👍 32
🔁 3
💬 2
📌 0
In a big city, where fares produce a lot of needed revenue, eliminating fares mean less service. It means that the poor people that the author claims to care about can't access opportunity, because the free bus they need doesn't exist, or is too crowded to board. 5/
14.02.2026 14:36 —
👍 52
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 0
She also cites the limited experiments in Boston, encouraging the reader to think that it was tried citywide. In fact, only a few routes in low-income areas are free. Outside of emergencies, citywide free bus fares have NEVER been done in any big city in the world. Maybe there's a reason! 4/
14.02.2026 14:35 —
👍 34
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Free fares are still working in some smaller US cities -- Richmond VA and Albuquerque NM are now the largest. But Kansas City just went back to charging fares. Why? Some feel security was worse. But the big reason is: They need the money!!! 3/
14.02.2026 14:34 —
👍 40
🔁 2
💬 3
📌 0
The author cites all the usual examples that have nothing to do with NYC, such as entirely rural systems in Washington State. Yes, free fares work OK in rural places and small towns where ridership is so low that fares don't even pay for the costs of fare collection. 2/
14.02.2026 14:33 —
👍 48
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Opinion | Something Surprising Happens When Bus Rides Are Free
Sorry, but this @nytimes.com op-ed on free fares in New York City, by @galvinalmanza.bsky.social, is deeply ignorant of the issues.
It proposes that pretty social justice vibes and some careless citations will change facts of math. Thread: 1/
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/o...
14.02.2026 14:33 —
👍 92
🔁 37
💬 6
📌 7
I am old.
13.02.2026 20:41 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Apple Liquid Glass is what happens when a junk food company sees sales declining and the only thing they can think of is to add more sugar.
12.02.2026 19:03 —
👍 62
🔁 7
💬 3
📌 0
Apple Liquid Glass is what happens when a junk food company sees sales declining and the only thing they can think of is to add more sugar.
12.02.2026 19:03 —
👍 62
🔁 7
💬 3
📌 0
So people walk or use bikes, unless the destination is up a steep hill on a dangerous road.
12.02.2026 12:58 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0