The Association of Greek Archaeologists has published an open letter withdrawing its participation from the EAA Athens advisory committee 🍉
archaeol.gr/anoichti-epi...
@anchieri.bsky.social
👨🏻💻 PhD student at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland 🧬 Population Genomics
The Association of Greek Archaeologists has published an open letter withdrawing its participation from the EAA Athens advisory committee 🍉
archaeol.gr/anoichti-epi...
To sum up, the effect of the sampling is what we're testing here, and I am confident in our results and their presentation. I am very open to discussing it directly with you on Zoom, if you are interested. I feel like having an actual conversation would be more useful to both of us. Let me know!
08.02.2026 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It is true that some methods fare better with strong selection than others here, but I think the results from the first part with "ideal" data, and the way they are discussed in the discussion, offer enough context so as not to suggest that some methods are just always bad with strong selection
08.02.2026 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In the second part, we look at "ancient-like" data by focusing on a sampling scheme based on a real-life scenario. This one also produces streaks of fixed alleles for higher coefficients, albeit to a lesser extent than in the 1,000 gen. version of the "ideal" dataset (Fig. S2).
08.02.2026 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In that case, while weak selection is now more easily detectable, the sampling does not allow to estimate strong selection. The fact that this is an effect of the sampling is clearly, explicitly described in the figures, results, and discussion.
08.02.2026 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0In this case, we do show that stronger selection is easier to estimate while weaker selection remains undetectable. On the opposite, the dataset covering a longer timespan (1,000 gen.) does produce a long streak of fixed alleles (Fig. S1). This corresponds to not removing the red part on your plot.
08.02.2026 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I think that last statement oversimplifies what the results show. We assess several sampling strategies. In the first part with "ideal" data, the dataset covering a "short" timespan (100 gen.) corresponds in practice to what you suggest to do on your plot for large selection coeffs. (see Fig. S1).
08.02.2026 20:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0When sampling over a long period of time, the trajectory can reach fixation too quickly to be effectively covered, and the subsequent streak of time points with a frequency of 1 in itself is uninformative. All methods, not just BMWS, struggle to estimate stronger selection coefficients in that case
06.02.2026 10:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We actually discussed a lot about that and decided to keep all simulations. We thought that applying any type of conditioning on loss/fixation would also introduce some kind of bias, as we wanted to also test cases with “bad” trajectories. What you mention here is precisely what our results show.
06.02.2026 10:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0@anchieri.bsky.social @cegamorim.bsky.social et al. benchmark the inference of selection with aDNA-like time series datasets, showing that ApproxWF can estimate selection with datasets of ∼100 individuals when selection is strong.
🔗 doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaf234
#genome #evolution #compbio
🧬 Now published in Bioinformatics Advances: "pygenstrat: A Python package for EIGENSTRAT data processing" by @dilekopter.bsky.social
Full article available: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbag022
Interested in using aDNA time-series datasets to estimate selection?
Our study "Assessing Ancient DNA Sampling Strategies for Natural Selection Inference in Humans Using Allele Frequency Time Series Data" is now out in GBE! doi.org/10.1093/gbe/... @genomebiolevol.bsky.social @cegamorim.bsky.social
Thanks for putting this together!! I would be happy to be part of the list as well
13.11.2024 18:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0With all the new people migrating into BlueSky, we have created a small starter pack for aDNA (and other molecules) researchers. go.bsky.app/F4EPLJh 🧪🏺 #evosky #PaleoSky
13.11.2024 13:56 — 👍 76 🔁 45 💬 22 📌 4