You know you're in trouble when George W Bush's middle east strategy people start saying your middle east strategy sucks.
Based on this river of drivel you put Prez's TL, you're not a native thinker either.
Our special military operations are not random; they are necessary from time to time to stabilize the pension system.
He's fulfilling his campaign to end forever wars by saying this war might last forever.
Sun Tzu: "War is a matter of vital importance to the State. It is not to be treated as a trivial pursuit but as a matter of life & death, a road to safety or to ruin"
Donald's Whitehouse: "Here is a bowling video we made with something called "nano banana".
Who the fuck are you calling parody?
Leaving aside how small is the piece of shit that anyone gives for your opinions, this just reads as mental gymnastics in response to how stupid your comment was.
His intellect made the room emptier.
I can see why a post that didnt mention netanyahu would make you conclude that it was about him. Suggestions that trump only benefits Russia are well known Zionism. It naturally also includes every American alive.
Idiot.
Suggesting that Donald only benefits Russia is certainly anti Semitic. We can see this now. We shall try to do better in future.
Fuck me running this TL is an absolute river of idiocy at times.
There are no pro Putin Zionists. You totally wouldn't have that in common. 😘
"Sir, this a Wendy's"
I didn't realise Galloway had an account here. Hello George. Your hat is fucking stupid and you look like an idiot in a lycra onesie.
I blamed the election hacking on the Jews too. We have a lot in common.
But sure. The fact that Donald only ever seems to do stuff that benefits Russia is "Zionist propaganda".
We need to acknowledge role played by Biden, Sullivan, Scholz and the gang for letting me hang on long enough for Donald to rescue me.
History will be kind to them.
It makes more sense if you realise he's working for Russia.
Bizarre but true: it is March 2026, and yet twice this month at two different events in two different countries I have had audience questions from individuals who are still adamant that Russia only invades its neighbours because NATO makes them do it.
They are still out there, folks.
The suggestion that most people already think russian crimes are bad is made with scant evidence. The left either don't care about russian expansion or only claim to oppose by offering the same excuses we do for it, which isn't opposing it. Then there are the attempts to minimise it.
Demanding intellectual and ethical consistency isn't a whatabout argument.
If Donald tries to give me a pair of shoes I'll release the files.
Still, at least the Anschluss 'vote' had the status quo as an option, unlike when we did it to Crimea.
Which might mean Hitler was more democratic than me…
OTD in 1938 the Austrian Anschluss. A dictator sent his army over the border & later had illegal referendum with rigged result that violated numerous treaties. The West expressed only “concern” which turned out not to be enough to prevent war….
Imagine that happening today.
There can be only one master strategist. But I could refer to Donald as "America's unique strategic advantage"...
@darthputinkgb.bsky.social taught me the answer to this question, while none of my assorted history classes every did. Best follow online!
Does this mean it is only a crime against humanity if the US is supplying the weapons?
One could be forgiven for thinking this is what many believe tbh.
There were no protests when we were accused (yet again) of crimes because "most people already agree that Russian crimes are bad".
Like when we helped starve Yarmouk. So well known. Even which group were starved.
Keep scrolling.
Invasion of Ukraine 2022. "Special military operation. What else?
Syria 2015 "liquidation of terrorists on distant approaches". And every hospital, bread queue and market in aleppo.
