Philip Ball's Avatar

Philip Ball

@philipcball.bsky.social

Science writer and author of books including Bright Earth, The Music Instinct, Beyond Weird, How Life Works.

16,279 Followers  |  196 Following  |  5,347 Posts  |  Joined: 25.09.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Philip Ball (@philipcball.bsky.social)

(Truth is that I'm pretty certain there's not much on those disks that's worth too much effort - just those old graphics files.)

01.03.2026 04:21 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Thanks - I might look into such things, though I'm a Mac user.

And thank you for that lovely review of Alchemy by the way, which I discovered on looking at this.

01.03.2026 04:19 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility - Wikipedia

Back in the 1980s-2000s, there was an organization called
Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility that worked to oppose irresponsible and dangerous uses of computers in warfare. Maybe it needs a reboot, in our new age of AI.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compute...

28.02.2026 23:47 — 👍 129    🔁 21    💬 6    📌 2

Wow, that's cheap! But I guess these will all be Freehand files in an obsolete format no app I possess will now read.

28.02.2026 22:52 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

😅Our house is already that, and it's not a very big house.

28.02.2026 22:45 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

That's not going to happen though Becky, is it? I'm probably going to ditch all my CDs with stored files too.

28.02.2026 22:05 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

No, that's long gone.

28.02.2026 22:04 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Ah, I think it is finally time to let go of my old floppy disks with the figures for my early books on them.
(Gen Z: "Wait, how come those look like the Save icon?")

28.02.2026 20:54 — 👍 79    🔁 0    💬 6    📌 0

This is exactly what I'm working on now 😉

27.02.2026 23:34 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

"...to you rather than the experts who actually built these systems?" Well, this is why. Many of those people can code better than I will ever be able to, but in other respects OMFG. 2/2

27.02.2026 22:15 — 👍 6    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

"Retirement may be a risk to welfare of the models themselves. Although we remain very uncertain on this front, models may have morally relevant preferences or experiences related to or affected by their deprecation and replacement." Sometimes you hear people say "Yeah but why should I listen... /1

27.02.2026 22:14 — 👍 7    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

Crikey, 89. I've seen Buddy several times, always amazing.

27.02.2026 22:08 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I'd nitpick it.

27.02.2026 22:07 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

True, but the likes of Hinton are unconvincing on this. You needn't take that from me - far better informed people say the same thing.

27.02.2026 21:07 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

🙁

27.02.2026 18:02 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

That's very good. But it is a recent thing that needed a lot of pushing to achieve - a couple of decades ago, scientists doing sci comm were still rather looked down upon, or at least it wasn't seen as a core part of what they do. Now the likes of Alice R, Helen Cz, Mark M & Jim Al-K are superstars

27.02.2026 17:57 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Yes, it does - but perhaps not as much as it used to, before the BBC radio science unit was foolishly broken up by the corporation, and now with the excellent Science In Action dropped from the World Service. Shows we can't take it for granted.

27.02.2026 17:55 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

That's so good to hear Katie. I'm proud to be a part of it. Part of the key to it is that we actually like each other. There are plenty of folks like this in the US too, and I just wish they were the most prominent. (But I know you're working on that, even if from over the border...)

27.02.2026 17:46 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

He's speaking for just about every left-wing progressive I know. The question is whether these changes can be made (perhaps), and whether they can be made without ugly factionist infighting (seems unlikely, sadly).

27.02.2026 17:41 — 👍 11    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

And I could list a whole galaxy more of this crowd with equal 😍. (You know who you are, folks.)

27.02.2026 16:43 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Have to say, when I think about Brockman's Edge elite of "sci comm intellectuals" and then see the folks we have (even just UCL has!) today in the UK, I feel pretty damned flag-wavy about it. 😍

27.02.2026 16:41 — 👍 22    🔁 2    💬 3    📌 0
Post image

Cover of The Lancet:

@thelancet.com
www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...

27.02.2026 11:15 — 👍 8105    🔁 3438    💬 160    📌 220

OK, well as a fan of quantum (not so much AI), can I just say that this is really dumb?

27.02.2026 14:54 — 👍 9    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0

So far, so stupid from Starmer 😖

27.02.2026 14:51 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The comments thread made me laugh though.

27.02.2026 14:19 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 0

Mine too, TBH.

27.02.2026 14:10 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

That image. THAT IMAGE. Or is it just from the next version of Wuthering Heights?

27.02.2026 13:05 — 👍 9    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Now what we need is a progressive coalition, instead of the bloody fools taking chunks out of each other. A Reform victory would have made that even more clear, but I'd rather not have paid that price.

27.02.2026 08:46 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

Ah, well in that case you'll sadly have to count me out. But it sounds great.

26.02.2026 21:52 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Totally agree. And I suspect this remains the greatest threat, though I can't quite tell how serious a prospect it is that AI will soon be put in charge of military arsenals...

26.02.2026 21:50 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0