@alainqueffelec.bsky.social
Ingénieur de recherche CNRS, PhD in Caribbean archaeology (lithic beads and pendants). Archaeometry, spectroscopy, minerals and so on.
Exactly this!
16.09.2025 06:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Author-Paid PublicationFees Corrupt Science and Should Be Abandoned Thomas J. H Morgan & Paul E. Smaldino
As grant money starts drying up, it's more important than ever not to waste it on paying publishers' open access "article processing fees" when we can host PDFs for free. Tom Morgan and I wrote a paper on this, forthcoming at Science and Public Policy. Accepted draft here: osf.io/preprints/os...
09.05.2025 17:26 — 👍 398 🔁 134 💬 9 📌 18
Many thanks to Karlstad University for becoming a supporter of PCI this year (www.kau.se/en)%F0%9F%98...!
22.08.2025 07:08 — 👍 7 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0⬇️⬇️⬇️
Also worth reading for other domains than health sciences! 👏
Figure 5 from the manuscript: Two photographs of fieldwork with arrows pointing at details and text in boxes explaining the details of how spatial information is recorded in the field. First photograph depicts a system that measures distance in relation to trench entities. Second photograph depicts a geospatial specialist and a fieldworker determining an object’s position using a digital theodolite.
1/3 New recommendation: Zachary Batist (2025) Locating Creative Agency in Archaeological Data Work. ver.2 recommended by @pciarchaeology.bsky.social doi.org/10.17613/8eq... @zackbatist.archaeo.social.ap.brid.gy 🏺🧪🦣
09.08.2025 08:29 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Come join us with this new post-doctoral position in the Quanta project: emploi.cnrs.fr/Offres/CDD/U... (2 years in Bordeaux)
If you love artifacts (especially bones), notches, microscopes, and exploring the big question of the origin of quantification systems in human lineage, this is for you!
Delighted to be bringing you the following PAASTA community-led paper outlining our recommendations for best practices and open science in palaeoproteomics! Congratulations to the authors and for anyone keen to read the paper, it can be found #OpenAccess here: doi.org/10.24072/pcj...
06.08.2025 07:57 — 👍 17 🔁 10 💬 0 📌 2
New look, same mission 🔬🌍
The IsoArcH initiative just launched its brand-new website: isoarch.org
Check it out and dive into the world’s largest isotope database!
Figure 2 from the manuscript. Top panel: effects of fire on the landscape observed in 2021 and 2022. Bottom panel: burned surface lithic scatters showing effects such as fractures and color changes.
Figure 3 from the manuscript: Causal model for mechanical alterations of pebbles under the effect of fire. Red, direct and mediation effects (Fire -unmeasured-, Fissures, Rock_Type and Shape). Gray, latent unobserved variables (Biomass, Knapping and Trampling). Green, outcome variable (Mech_Alt).
1/3 New recommendation: Cardillo, Marcelo & Carranza, Eugenia (2025) Applying statistical and causal modeling to interpret thermal alteration in observational lithic data. doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🧪🏺
22.07.2025 09:15 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Will read your paper with interest. Currently, this map with these circles is really not clear for me ! 🙂
21.07.2025 20:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Needless to say, the Peer Community In outperforms all of the major publishers on this criterion, despite a budget many orders of magnitude smaller - again illustrating that the big money we pay for publishing is not used for the good of science. (5/5)
@peercommunityin.bsky.social
figure showing nine data points (each for a distinct publisher) in a graph where Y-axis is our open science index and X-axis is academia friendliness (=proportion of published journals co-owned by an academic entity); strong positive relationship
Non-profit publishers (PLoS, Oxford, Cambridge) and publishers partnering a lot with academia (Wiley) are much more committed to open science than the others - MDPI being the worst by large. (4/5)
17.07.2025 07:18 — 👍 37 🔁 27 💬 4 📌 2New preprint about open science in eco-evo!
We sampled 110 journals, 550 articles, and assessed whether data and code are accessible: (1/5)
ecoevorxiv.org/repository/v...
#ScientificPublishing #OpenScience #ecology #conservation #EvolutionaryBiology #paleobio #systematics #archeology
An Introduction to Bioarchaeology
New video available for channel supporters on Patreon or YT memberships
Check it out here, and sign up for additional teaching videos and behind-the-scenes perks
www.patreon.com/posts/134346...
1/3 Super interview de notre doctorante Lisa Richelmi avec Benjamin Brillaud de Nota Bene ! 🐞🧑🔬
www.twitch.tv/videos/25139...
Elle y présente sa thèse en archéoentomologique @univbordeaux.bsky.social @cnrsecologie.bsky.social
The 'Bioengineered' story was mentioned in @theguardian.com today!
Read here
www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
More background on Bioengineered here: www.science.org/content/arti...
CC: @elisabethbik.bsky.social @mortenoxe.bsky.social @smutclyde.bsky.social @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social
I'd like to come for once!
13.07.2025 06:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
How we use game mechanics to explore and educate about archaeology in our board game Cultivaria- a thread.
#archaeology #boardgame
Why I quit itsmoreofacomment.com/2022/10/28/w... (and it is the same for Researchgate...)
I may instead orient you towards @orcid.org instead, HAL in France, Zenodo etc.
Thank you @archaeobasti.bsky.social for this post few years ago but still very relevant.
IsoArcH is organizing its first Addithon, a 10-day virtual community event! This event will bring volunteers together from all over the world, to add to this ever-growing open data repository for isotopes from archaeological research.
bit.ly/IsoArcH2025
What a nice cover!
I don't think I will have time to read it but I will share with my French lithician colleagues! :)
The Digital Archaeo Summer School concluded with a visit to La Chaise (Middle Paleo), excavated by our postdocs Diego López Onaindia & @kimgenuite.bsky.social 45 early-career researchers from 6 countries joined us, thank you all! See you in 2026! @cnrsecologie.bsky.social @univbordeaux.bsky.social
09.07.2025 13:42 — 👍 13 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 1Yes it is much more work and more difficult for non-native English speakers! It's great to remind this!
08.07.2025 17:16 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Postdoc in Geochronology / Plio-Pleistocene Geology
Join the ERC WRAP project at ICArEHB!
Apply now 👉 www.icarehb.com/research-pos...
Et une proposition dans l'article est bel et bien de passer par @peercommunityin.bsky.social and @peercomjournal.bsky.social ! :)
08.07.2025 17:08 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0A way too rare occasion to replicate research in Archaeological Sciences 🏺🧪
And you, do you sometimes reproduce or replicate archaeological research?
It has been submitted for evaluation at @pciarchaeology.bsky.social of course!
All data and code available on zenodo (doi.org/10.5281/zeno...) and on my GitHub account. #opendata
Thanks @benmarwick.bsky.social for the possibility to learn from reproducing your work and for providing the basis for this replication, which are unfortunately excessively rare in #Archaeology!
PCA showing the distribution of the top-25 2 year-mean-citedness journals based on 5 metrics: Number of pages, Number of authors, Relative title length, Recency fo references and Diversity of sources.
Ranking for the top-25 journals for each metric, and summary of these rankings in a single plot showing the "harder" science journals and the "softer" science journals.
And do journals compare? I find the same kind of results as Marwick (2025), but the list of journal is rather different. "Harder" journals are Conservation/Museum artifacts studies journals. "Softer" journals are review journals.
08.07.2025 14:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Table comparing the ranking archaelogical journals between OpenAlex and Web of Science for the top 25 journals. Ranking by 2-yer-mean-citedness, H-index and i10 for OpenAlex, and 2022 Impact Factor for Web of Science
How does openalex.org compares with Web of Science? OpenAlex (which is free and #opensource) has MUCH more data, but apparently a bit less curated yet. Will improve for sure thanks to public institutions now supporting the project!
08.07.2025 14:32 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Boxplots comparing data for top-25 journal metrics and data from Fanelli & Glanzel 2013 for Physics, Social Sciences and Humanities. Most of the time Archaeology fits pretty close to Social Sciences, except for Diversity of sources where it harder than Physics.
New #preprint online: Reproduction and replication of @benmarwick.bsky.social (2025), with data from OpenAlex.
Accessible as interactive html version: aqueff.github.io/replication_...
and more traditional manuscript with doi here: doi.org/10.31235/osf...
Is archaeology a hard or soft science? 🏺🧪
