Matt Ford's Avatar

Matt Ford

@mford.bsky.social

Staff writer, The New Republic. Law, democracy, and the courts. 49ers/Dodgers stuff too.

50,333 Followers  |  510 Following  |  1,663 Posts  |  Joined: 19.05.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Matt Ford (@mford.bsky.social)

Mine is A View To A Kill but 90 percent of that might be Duran Duran and Bay Area nostalgia.

01.03.2026 01:17 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
28.02.2026 20:48 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Iraq War AUMF vote destroyed multiple political careers and, via Hillary Clinton, helped decide at least two presidential elections. Congress’s big takeaway from that experience was to stop holding votes on wars.

28.02.2026 20:42 β€” πŸ‘ 213    πŸ” 49    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

The judges in WV have seen enough.

They say that if the ICE continues detaining people in ways they have unanimously deemed illegal they will start issuing civil fines and contempt findings β€” including against state officials who help them carry it out.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

28.02.2026 13:58 β€” πŸ‘ 9283    πŸ” 2669    πŸ’¬ 293    πŸ“Œ 209
Preview
a man in a suit is sitting in a chair with a book in front of him and the website sharktankgifts.com is visible Alt: Mark Cuban taking notes

Watching Hegseth’s war on Anthropic while thinking about X and Palantir in three years

28.02.2026 01:24 β€” πŸ‘ 432    πŸ” 59    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 3

They’re requested all the time, but never granted. With a 6-3 majority behind the ruling, there aren’t even enough dissenting justices to force it if they wanted. (And I would be stunned if they did.)

27.02.2026 22:01 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

SCOTUS does have a mechanism for this but they haven’t used it since 1965. None of the current justices have even served with a justice who’s used it.

27.02.2026 21:55 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

A notable new comment from California AG Rob Bonta: He says "I'm in conversation with my AG colleagues about Paramount/Warner Bros," meaning he is talking with other state attorneys general about possibly suing to block the deal

27.02.2026 20:07 β€” πŸ‘ 430    πŸ” 108    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 22

Brad Pitt might be the best example of the flip side of this thinking.

27.02.2026 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

i dont know if its always been like this but among the elites theres just no sense of responsibility to be good stewards of the society thats given them everything

27.02.2026 01:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1651    πŸ” 274    πŸ’¬ 72    πŸ“Œ 26

I’ve been biting my tongue for months because I didn’t want to ruin people’s fun. The Prime Directive still applies for most of these guys.

27.02.2026 04:33 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I speak football to family, basketball to friends, baseball to God, and hockey to my horse.

27.02.2026 04:12 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Hockey is a beautiful sport played by a lot of guys who are barely sentient.

27.02.2026 04:11 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0
As noted, Rosen asserted in his email that "[t]he lawyers in my civil division
didn't deserve" the supposedly inaccurate January 28 order. Putting aside the fact that
the January 28 order was not inaccurate, Rosen failed to mention that this Court said the
following in the show-cause order that preceded the January 28 order:
The Court expresses its appreciation to attorney Ana Voss and her colleagues [in the civil division], who have struggled mightily to ensure that respondents comply with court orders despite the fact that respondents have failed to provide them with adequate resources.
ECF No. 7 at 2 n.1.
The judges of this District have been extraordinarily patient with the government
attorneys, recognizing that they have been put in an impossible position by Rosen and
his superiors in the Department of Justice (leading many of those attorneys- including, unfortunately, Ana Voss- to resign). What those attorneys "didn't deserve" was the
Administration sending 3000 ICE agents to Minnesota to detain people without making
any provision for handling the hundreds of lawsuits that were sure to follow.

As noted, Rosen asserted in his email that "[t]he lawyers in my civil division didn't deserve" the supposedly inaccurate January 28 order. Putting aside the fact that the January 28 order was not inaccurate, Rosen failed to mention that this Court said the following in the show-cause order that preceded the January 28 order: The Court expresses its appreciation to attorney Ana Voss and her colleagues [in the civil division], who have struggled mightily to ensure that respondents comply with court orders despite the fact that respondents have failed to provide them with adequate resources. ECF No. 7 at 2 n.1. The judges of this District have been extraordinarily patient with the government attorneys, recognizing that they have been put in an impossible position by Rosen and his superiors in the Department of Justice (leading many of those attorneys- including, unfortunately, Ana Voss- to resign). What those attorneys "didn't deserve" was the Administration sending 3000 ICE agents to Minnesota to detain people without making any provision for handling the hundreds of lawsuits that were sure to follow.

If anything is "beyond the pale," it is ICE's continued violation of the orders of
this Court. Increasingly, this Court has had to resort to using the threat of civil
contempt to force ICE to comply with orders. The Court is not aware of another
occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten
contempt -again and again and again - to force the United States government to comply
with court orders.
-5-
CASE 0:26-cv-00107-PJS-DLM Doc. 12
Filed 02/26/26 Page 6 of 6
This Court will continue to do whatever is required to protect the rule of law,
including, if necessary, moving to the use of criminal contempt. One way or another,
ICE will comply with this Court's orders.
Dated: February 26, 2026
(s/ Patrick J. Schiltz
Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge
United States District Court

If anything is "beyond the pale," it is ICE's continued violation of the orders of this Court. Increasingly, this Court has had to resort to using the threat of civil contempt to force ICE to comply with orders. The Court is not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt -again and again and again - to force the United States government to comply with court orders. -5- CASE 0:26-cv-00107-PJS-DLM Doc. 12 Filed 02/26/26 Page 6 of 6 This Court will continue to do whatever is required to protect the rule of law, including, if necessary, moving to the use of criminal contempt. One way or another, ICE will comply with this Court's orders. Dated: February 26, 2026 (s/ Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz, Chief Judge United States District Court

BREAKING: Judge Patrick Schiltz in Minnesota threatens criminal contempt, if necessary, to address ICE noncompliance in an order calling out U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen's response to Schiltz's earlier questions about noncompliance with court orders.

"ICE will comply with this Court's orders."

26.02.2026 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2274    πŸ” 732    πŸ’¬ 33    πŸ“Œ 64

Bad news, folks: Trump obtained the Staff of Disenfranchisement from the Crypt of Ben Tillman. Now he can cast Election Control as a free action once he reaches level 20.

26.02.2026 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 311    πŸ” 52    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Antonio Tejero Molina, 93, Dies; Spanish Colonel Led Failed Coup

Hey look a guy who led a failed coup died in obscurity after 15 years in prison, I didn't know that was possible www.nytimes.com/2026/02/25/w...

26.02.2026 02:20 β€” πŸ‘ 681    πŸ” 81    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 4

Barrett wrote in her Skrmetti concurrence that there wasn’t a history of de jure discrimination against trans Americans, and the GOP has relentlessly sought to prove her wrong.

26.02.2026 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 441    πŸ” 116    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 1

The other great bit here is that Saruman is metaphysically wrong. He’s a Maiar! He’s met the gods! He knows Iluvatar is real! Saruman’s hubris and lust for power is so overwhelming that he’s willing to defy God, who ontologically exists.

25.02.2026 16:28 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

One of Tolkien’s best tricks IMO was that the wizards were arguably a net negative for Middle-Earth. The Valar sent five demigods to help and three of them peaced out, one switched sides, and the last one needed God’s direct intervention along the way.

25.02.2026 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Goodell Doctrine.

25.02.2026 14:40 β€” πŸ‘ 66    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

it's fascinating to watch Costco lap every one of these clowns because they have the only CEO in America who still thinks his job is to run a company that does business and not be the main character of life forging his personal legacy with one eye on the group chat to see if they're impressed yet

25.02.2026 14:24 β€” πŸ‘ 5162    πŸ” 762    πŸ’¬ 55    πŸ“Œ 14

It's weird to write up a publicity stunt story about a fictional mascot like it's a real news story? Like not "proctor and gamble and ad agency x are launching a new campaign for the venerable brand to boost flagging consumer sales" but just writing the story like Mr clean is a real guy?

25.02.2026 05:08 β€” πŸ‘ 775    πŸ” 56    πŸ’¬ 40    πŸ“Œ 7
Seriously what the hell

Seriously what the hell

I’m still mad about Yamamoto losing an immaculate inning on the ninth pitch last year on this called ball. ABS forever.

25.02.2026 02:44 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Watching today’s Pirates/Red Sox spring training game and the umpire just had five straight calls overturned by ABS. I can’t wait for Opening Day.

25.02.2026 02:39 β€” πŸ‘ 26    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The first interesting bit of news about the SOTU in years.

24.02.2026 23:35 β€” πŸ‘ 35    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Very sorry for your loss, Rick.

24.02.2026 23:20 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Even I know this.

24.02.2026 21:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

There were seven (7) opinions in last week's tariffs decision. The two justices who didn't write hammed it up in oral argument today...

24.02.2026 19:09 β€” πŸ‘ 65    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3
Preview
Clarence Thomas Has Lost the Plot The associate justice’s dissent in the tariffs case deserves some extra attention, because it his hopelessly uncoupled from law, history, and the Constitution.

Wrote about that weird Thomas dissent in last week’s tariff ruling:

24.02.2026 17:40 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 4

SCOTUS rules that the FTCA’s postal exception covers intentional misdelivery of the mail. 5-4 with Gorsuch joining the dissenting liberals: www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

24.02.2026 15:08 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1