Least I've been shagged
24.01.2026 18:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@commieraul.bsky.social
Marxist-Leninist | Internationalist | Dialectical Materialist | On Xi Jinping's Payroll | They/Them
Least I've been shagged
24.01.2026 18:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Agreed. Hence why I called that particular example of yours a bad example.
24.01.2026 18:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Says the loser with the obvious interiority complex, lol
24.01.2026 18:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So you admit you operate in logical fallacies and are in capable of constructing an actual, coherent argument? Good, you're learning.
24.01.2026 18:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You should talk about this movie then instead of embarrassing yourself all the time by insisting Star Wars is deep and meaningful, lol.
It's not about how "obscure" a movie is, that's a bad strawman argument you keep repeating.
Do you blackout when you post comments or are you just being wilfully obtuse?
24.01.2026 18:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0He can say that. Execution is kinda shit tho. Was my initial point. But I guess that's just your illiteracy showing.
24.01.2026 18:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ironic coming from the raving lunatic.
24.01.2026 18:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Why should I any free labour for you, you petulant child?
I offered to educate you, you spat in my face.
I got better things to do.
LMAO
NOWAY THIS LOSER PULLED OUT HIS LETTERBOXD 😭😭
Jesus Christ, take a shower
Not at all. You're the one who brought up Seventh Seal, lol. Not even the type of movies I was gonna recommend. There's so many good movies out there and you're throwing a tantrum over a cartoon with a child's idea of how politics works, lmao. You're pointing at text and saying it's subtext.
24.01.2026 18:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Aight bud, whatever makes you feel superior to everyone else, I guess.
24.01.2026 17:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Lol, such a child
24.01.2026 17:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Didn't write off any genres, but you clearly are. I like Star Wars. Plenty of aspects to those films to appreciate as artistic achievements. It doesn't require pretending that there's any deeper subtext than there is. You're a child who was criticised one time and is now lashing out. Grow up.
24.01.2026 17:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Sorry for trying to educate you, I guess.
Knowing about film means watching good movies, yes.
You don't like Marvel movies, you don't like serious dramas. Do you only like cartoons with poor attempts at political drama?
It was a mild criticism, not "hostile". You're never beating the "childish" accusations.
If it helps, I am no longer following you.
I'm not. You're just choosing to attack me over it because I upset you over some other trivial matter. Grow up lib.
24.01.2026 17:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Not at all, it's one of the most critically acclaimed films of all time.
Such a poor strawman argument on your part. I don't know why you have such an inferiority complex but you probably need to do some introspection.
If you watch the Star Wars movies, lots of good tips on how to do that.
Idk why we followed each other but I was growing tired of your infantile attempts at film analysis on my feed. I made one criticism of one of your weaker arguments and you threw a fit, started getting abusive. You began with the insults. Time to look inward. Take a break from the internet.
24.01.2026 17:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1You mean Seventh Seal? Yes that is a good movie. You should try watching more big boy movies like that. You may become far less childish as a result. You don't have to try and fail to intellectualise around cheap children's movies in order to justify liking them.
24.01.2026 17:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1If me criticising this idiot's vapid pseudo-intellectual understanding of film is making you anti-worker and pro-imperialist, I'd say that's more of a you problem than my problem.
24.01.2026 17:35 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Lol, okay
24.01.2026 17:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You helped set up the projector screen and hand out the colored pencils to all the kids? How nice. Hope they never actually let you teach.
24.01.2026 17:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1That's not how you use the word "ontologically", lol
And my argument is that your example is not one of subtext and there is very limited subtext in those movies. Aside from a couple scenes, they're largely very bland and very basic movies for simpletons like yourself.
I think should should study some basic film theory before calling everyone else an idiot, would be far less embarrassing for you.
24.01.2026 17:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 1Doesn't even invoke the same imagery beyond two large mechanised vehicles moving on the screen, not even in the same direction. Funny you call yourself "elder" but you behave like a child.
24.01.2026 17:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 1Lol, you need to grow up a bit. Far better movies with actual subtext out there. You don't need to pretend a children's space fantasy movie has subtext. Would you like me to send you a list?
24.01.2026 17:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Because that's how homage works, lmao
24.01.2026 17:12 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 1Bad attempt at a parallel or a bad example. Couldn't even frame the shot right even with CGI.
Plenty of other textual examples without needing to pretend there's subtext.
Is okay if you enjoy movies, you don't have to pretend like they're that deep or meaningful. They're very basic.
It's a fucking strawman. "Muh rugged individualism". Look where that's gotten us.
23.01.2026 21:29 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0