New Paper: Estimating the Prevalence of LLM-Assisted Text in Scholarly #Writing (preprint) www.infodocket.com/2025/12/02/r... #AI #scholcomm #GenAI #LLMs
02.12.2025 22:35 — 👍 6 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 2@socarxiv.bsky.social
Open archive of social science. Free. Academy owned. Posts by director Philip N. Cohen. Say it: so-SHAR-kive (soʊʃɑrkaɪv). Website: socarxiv.org. New papers post at: https://bsky.app/profile/socarxivbot.bsky.social
New Paper: Estimating the Prevalence of LLM-Assisted Text in Scholarly #Writing (preprint) www.infodocket.com/2025/12/02/r... #AI #scholcomm #GenAI #LLMs
02.12.2025 22:35 — 👍 6 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 2Sorry! We are open to requests for exceptions, and will emerge from our pause when we face a policy in place...
For humanities there is Knowledge Commons hcommons.org.
Center for Open Science - Giving Tuesday
Each year, hundreds of people donate to COS, helping keep OSF free and strengthening our open scholarship training and community support across research fields. This #GivingTuesday, we’d be grateful for your support: www.cos.io/support-yef25.
02.12.2025 19:18 — 👍 4 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 1This talk by @simine.com about what other fields can learn from the crisis in psychology is excellent. I so wish sociology was listening. If 10% of sociologists knew 50% of what she says then research in sociology would be 100% better.
02.12.2025 18:44 — 👍 36 🔁 11 💬 1 📌 0Thank you!
02.12.2025 18:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0PAUSE sign
1. Pausing new submissions about AI topics for 90 days. That is, papers about AI models, testing AI models, proposing AI models, theories about the future of AI, etc. We will make exceptions for papers that are already accepted for publication (or published) in peer-reviewed scholarly journals
/2
Hard choices for preprint servers.
bioRxiv has always declined reviews/hypotheses b/c of concern about signal:noise and a wish to avoid subjective judgments. AI slop makes screening certain content similarly challenging so other servers are adopting new restrictions. Two thoughts... 1/3
thank you for sharing rainbow
As always: thanks for your support, thanks for our volunteers, and thank you to the researchs who share your work.
/7
This includes the values we want to support, the work we are able to do, and our technical requirements. We hope this policy will be ready to implement when the 90-day pause on AI-related papers ends. If you have expertise or suggestions for us in this work, we would appreciate hearing from you.
/6
pardon our dust while we improve - graphic
2. We are developing a policy for AI-related work. We need a formal policy on AI-generated and LLM-assisted content. We have formed a committee of volunteers from our social science and library science networks to gather existing policies and decide what to do.
/5
The purpose of this pause is to make it faster and easier for moderators to reject these papers, and encourage these authors to find other ways of distributing their work.
/4
And we will make exceptions for empirical social science research about AI in society – e.g., a study on how AI use affects workers in an organization – on a case-by-case basis. If your paper on an AI topic is rejected and you would like to appeal, email us a short note of explanation. Sorry!
/3
PAUSE sign
1. Pausing new submissions about AI topics for 90 days. That is, papers about AI models, testing AI models, proposing AI models, theories about the future of AI, etc. We will make exceptions for papers that are already accepted for publication (or published) in peer-reviewed scholarly journals
/2
In light of record submission rates and a large volume of AI-generated slop, SocArXiv recently implemented a policy requiring ORCIDs linked in the OSF profile of submitting authors, and narrowing our focus to social science subjects. Today we are taking two more steps:
/1
From @ripplingideas.bsky.social : Why post preprints: youtu.be/PgV5w-7GdT8
23.11.2025 21:32 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0The number of people who will respond to "Ask me for a copy" is a tiny fraction of those who would love to click on a non-paywalled link. Don't make people ask. SocArXiv is free to share, free to read, non-profit, academy-owned at a public university. Hello! Thanks for sharing.
29.09.2025 23:32 — 👍 32 🔁 12 💬 2 📌 0🙌 Three inspiring days at the #EUI celebrating excellence in sociology!
The 2025 Kohli Prize Awards honoured Peter S. Bearman for groundbreaking research and @socarxiv.bsky.social for advancing open, collaborative science.
💬 “These awards affirm sociology’s power to face today’s big questions.”
𝗔 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗳𝗲𝗹𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘆 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗨𝗜 𝘀𝗼 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.
Our gratitude to this year’s laureates, Peter Bearman and Philip Cohen, for their inspiring lectures.
@socarxiv.bsky.social @eui-sps.bsky.social @incitecolumbia.bsky.social
SocArXiv Announces Submission Rule Changes socopen.org/2025/11/19/s... #AI #spam #preprints #scholcomm @socarxiv.bsky.social
20.11.2025 19:11 — 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0This kind of announcement may help explain why so many people are using LLMs to flood preprints servers with papers about AI
08.11.2025 09:09 — 👍 51 🔁 14 💬 1 📌 0Thank you for sharing!
07.11.2025 10:54 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I delivered the laudatio for @socarxiv.bsky.social which won the 2025 @kohli-sociology.bsky.social Infrastructure Prize for Sociology. The ceremony was at the @eui-eu.bsky.social and SocArXiv was represented by @philipncohen.com .
My laudatio here:
www.fabriziobernardi.net/laudatio-for...
Broadcasting for Democracy: Reimagining Official-Citizen Communication. Preprint.
My take on strengthening the connection between representatives and the represented: individual, verified information channels for every elected official. osf.io/preprints/so...
via @socarxiv.bsky.social on OSF
Flowers and the Kohli Award for sociology infrastructure
Congratulations to us, and thank you, @kohli-sociology.bsky.social!
05.11.2025 15:33 — 👍 57 🔁 8 💬 1 📌 2I have written are review of "The Social Genome: The New Science of Nature and Nurture" by Dalton Conley
Pre-print on @socarxiv.bsky.social here:
osf.io/preprints/so...
I highly recommend it, particularly to graduate students
The reasons👇
Very much looking forward to my participation in this webinar on Wednesday, together with four impressive colleagues: Anna Hatch, @rnls.bsky.social, @catmacos.bsky.social and @richardsever.bsky.social
@cwtsnl.bsky.social @metaror.bsky.social
New Video (Webinar Recording): #Repositories in the Age of #AI: The Attack of the #Bots (via
@carl-abrc.bsky.social) www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY0d... #libraries
It's easy for some of you to just never use LLMs and just criticize people who do. I would like to be in that situation. But here I am, with my moderator volunteers, assessing hundreds of papers submitted to @socarxiv.bsky.social, trying to decide how to fairly judge whether to accept them. /1
02.11.2025 14:36 — 👍 38 🔁 13 💬 10 📌 3(Should note this only applies to the Computer Science section of arXiv)
02.11.2025 12:07 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0"The advent of large language models have made this type of content relatively easy to churn out on demand, and the majority of the review articles we receive are little more than annotated bibliographies, with no substantial discussion of open research issues."
02.11.2025 07:51 — 👍 33 🔁 13 💬 1 📌 3