Stirner Devil

Gender isn't real :3
Transness and cishood are different things :3

Day 3. The Princess

not the first, not the last

#slaytober #slaytober2025 #slaytheprincess

Non-Binary people should respond to the whole TIRF/Radfem/Gacc schtick by acting like this

You do know Itaya isn't agreeing with you, right?

Children deserve to be emancipated from the authoritarian control of adults

True liberation is anti-social

"TME jackass" I'm literally transfem lmao

Literally everyone in that thread was making fun of the idea of klansfem as an actual term lol

Someone even said its the equivalent to "feminazi" which is very stupid.

Which is what that tweet was complaining about, how certain big trans accounts misrepresent more radical queer theory, misattribute queerphobia to other vulnerable queer groups, and help in creating an environment prone for reactionary infiltration (with TIRFS and all that)

Well no, not really. I wasn't shitting on trans women I was complaining about a gaggle of reactionaries perked around certain key trans (women and men and enbies) figures. I'm not transmisogynist really I just think reactionary positions on gender are becoming popular in trans spaces.

woah there, I only like Marinetti's attitude, the explicit fascists I like are Mishima and D'Annunzio, and only for their artistic works. That text though is by Stirner, a very smart anarchist!

Only a racist would say that the term "racist" is used unfairly stigmatize people. That's the issue here, if someone is called a klansfem and they aren't, thats fine. But if someone is called a klansfem and their reaction is to say its a fake term invented to silence people, thats indicative

I agree sex is materially enforced! never have I said anything to the contrary in fact!!

Been doing so since 1844

Abolishing gender, despite what theorists like Vikky Storm might say, will indeed abolish gender identity as a grouping of social performances and signifiers. Iconoclasm means iconoclasm.

delirious. All liberals really do have bats in their belfry. Should I even bother to argue? To say "No thats clearly not what I meant"? It's clear that I also mean that biological sex isn't real, that trans women are women and that gender abolitionism doesn't affect that, so what is it?

Did I say otherwise?

It is sillier to think ghosts are real. But liberals are the highest christians so I can see why my opinion is disliked here.

Also, I imagine you called me by my name because you know me from twitter but I literally don't know who you are.

Like you do understand being misgendered and denying a term that is used to call out people like you is different right?

What logic again? I'm firmly against transphobia and if you infer that I'm in favor of misgendering people based on what I said you're just really stupid

Just making shit up I see

When did I say gender based oppression doesn't exist? lmao

i'm not denying there are material consequences to the fiction of gender, it does, because people *choose* to *believe* it exists.

Yes, money is only as real as we decide it to be, thats why people steal things, thats why it should be abolished.

But if you believe gender is a real concrete thing as opposed to socially constructed and dependent on social and subjective factors you believe there's something that *objectively* makes someone a gender, and that is essentialist.

hmmm, no. The point of the original tweet is very clearly that gender abolitionists, no sorry, "gender denialists" are transphobic and believe people aren't the gender they are as opposed to you guys who believe gender is a real concrete thing people are because they are.

"Gender denialist" Lmao, yeah sure, I deny gender, it isn't real! It's an imposition, a phantasm people are taught to believe in and sacrifice their lives to, of course I deny it! you have to be delusional not to.

Does that mean it has no effect? No, of course it has material effect!

My favorite part of disagreeing with you people is being called a man, really makes me sure of my position every time

"he"

Something socially constructed is real in the sense that it can effect real things, but that same effect is based on a social contract to believe in it. I don't deny "womanhood" has a material *force*, I'm denying it is an essential category, something one can be outside of virtuality.