wnoble

wnoble

@wnoble.bsky.social

187 Followers 37 Following 15 Posts Joined Sep 2023
3 months ago
Implementing a Unified NIH Funding Strategy to Guide Consistent and Clearer Award Decisions | Grants & Funding

As far as I can tell, the main point of this new NIH policy is that there will no longer be an explicit payline in any of the institutes. It's hard to see how this new policy makes the decision-making process "clearer for applicants."

grants.nih.gov/news-events/...

4 0 1 0
8 months ago
Post image

Cascadia from @wnoble.bsky.social is a mass spec-based de novo sequencing model that uses a transformer architecture to handle data-independent acquisition data and achieves substantially improved performance across a range of instruments and experimental protocols. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

13 4 0 0
8 months ago
Preview
A transformer model for de novo sequencing of data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry data - Nature Methods Cascadia is a mass spectrometry-based de novo sequencing model that uses a transformer architecture to handle data-independent acquisition data and achieves substantially improved performance across a...

We’re excited to announce the publication of Cascadia, our new de novo sequencing model designed for DIA data. By extending the transformer architecture to fully capture the complexities of DIA data, we achieve state-of-the-art performance.

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

21 3 0 0
8 months ago

Excited to see this published! It is a good step in the process for people to assess their FDR control in proteomics experiments. Great work from @bo-wen.bsky.social and @urikeich.bsky.social in particular who drove this.

42 9 1 1
8 months ago
Preview
Assessment of false discovery rate control in tandem mass spectrometry analysis using entrapment - Nature Methods A theoretical foundation for entrapment methods is presented, along with a method that enables more accurate evaluation of false discovery rate (FDR) control in proteomics mass spectrometry analysis p...

Error control in proteomics mass spectrometry analysis is hard. We came up with a way to evaluate error control. Upshot: for old-school DDA data, not so bad. For DIA data, no existing tool successfully controls the false discovery rate!

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

31 10 1 1
9 months ago
Preview
Foundation model for mass spectrometry proteomics Mass spectrometry is the dominant technology in the field of proteomics, enabling high-throughput analysis of the protein content of complex biological samples. Due to the complexity of the instrument...

Interested in prediction tasks involving peptide mass spectra? Our foundation model uses pre-trained spectrum representations learned by a de novo sequencing model to solve many tasks better and with less data, from recognizing chimeras to separating N- and O-glycopeptides. arxiv.org/abs/2505.10848

12 7 0 1
1 year ago
Post image

Ledidi turns any genomics ML model into a controllable sequence designer by inverting the normal ML paradigm. Now, it is significantly faster, flexible, and more powerful than before.

Available on GitHub and installable with `pip install ledidi`

57 10 1 3
1 year ago
Preview
A generalizable Hi-C foundation model for chromatin architecture, single-cell and multi-omics analysis across species Nuclear DNA is organized into a compact three-dimensional (3D) structure that impacts critical cellular processes. High-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) is the most widely used method...

HiCFoundation is a Swiss army knife for Hi-C data. Any task that takes Hi-C as input will benefit from our pre-trained model. You can do resolution enhancement, reproducibility analysis, loop calling, prediction of epigenomic profiles, or single-cell Hi-C analysis. tinyurl.com/v3nmp6np

13 7 0 0
1 year ago
Preview
A BLAST from the past: revisiting blastp’s E-value AbstractMotivation. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, BLAST, is an indispensable tool for genomic research. BLAST established itself as the canonical

BLAST is a fantastic tool that has enabled sequence-driven discovery for over 30 years. But, alas, the E-value that it reports turns out to have some serious problems. Here we propose a fix. It's more computationally expensive, but computers are a bit faster than they were in 1990.
bit.ly/3ZDgYt8

11 3 0 0
1 year ago
Preview
Improved detection of differentially abundant proteins through FDR-control of peptide-identity-propagation Quantitative analysis of proteomics data frequently employs peptide-identity-propagation (PIP) — also known as match-between-runs (MBR) — to increase the number of peptides quantified in a given LC-MS/MS experiment. PIP can routinely account for up to 40% of all quantitative results, with that proportion rising as high as 75% in single-cell proteomics. Therefore, a significant concern for any PIP method is the possibility of false discoveries: errors that result in peptides being quantified incorrectly. Although several tools for label-free quantification (LFQ) claim to control the false discovery rate (FDR) of PIP, these claims cannot be validated as there is currently no accepted method to assess the accuracy of the stated FDR. We present a method for FDR control of PIP, called “PIP-ECHO” (PIP Error Control via Hybrid cOmpetition) and devise a rigorous protocol for evaluating FDR control of any PIP method. Using three different datasets, we evaluate PIP-ECHO alongside the PIP procedures implemented by FlashLFQ, IonQuant, and MaxQuant. These analyses show that PIP-ECHO can accurately control the FDR of PIP at 1% across multiple datasets. Only PIP-ECHO was able to control the FDR in data with injected sample size equivalent to a single-cell dataset. The three other methods fail to control the FDR at 1%, yielding false discovery proportions ranging from 2–6%. We demonstrate the practical implications of this work by performing differential expression analyses on spike-in datasets, where different known amounts of yeast or E. coli peptides are added to a constant background of HeLa cell lysate peptides. In this setting, PIP-ECHO increases both the accuracy and sensitivity of differential expression analysis: our implementation of PIP-ECHO within FlashLFQ enables the detection of 53% more differentially abundant proteins than MaxQuant and 146% more than IonQuant in the spike-in dataset. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Re-posting our new preprint on match between runs. This multi-lab effort (Keich, Noble, Payne & Smith) led by Alex Solivais should be of interest to anyone doing LFQ. We describe here how to control FDR in LFQ and provide the open source software to do it.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

31 15 2 2
1 year ago
GitHub - smith-chem-wisc/FlashLFQ: Ultra-fast label-free quantification algorithm for mass-spectrometry proteomics Ultra-fast label-free quantification algorithm for mass-spectrometry proteomics - smith-chem-wisc/FlashLFQ

Along the way, we show that existing methods --- IonQuant, and MaxQuant, and the old version of FlashLFQ --- fail to control the FDR.

The PIP-ECHO method is implemented in the new version of FlashLFQ:

github.com/smith-chem-w...

3 0 1 1
1 year ago

We make two contributions in this paper: first, a method for ascertaining whether a given technique for peptide identity propagation successfully controls the FDR, and second, a new method, PIP-ECHO, that successfully does this.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago

When you analyze multiple protein samples in a single MS/MS experiment, it's common to do peptide identity propagation, rescuing peptides that fail to be identified in one run by mapping their coordinates (in time and m/z) from a different run in which those peptides were successfully identified.

0 0 1 0
1 year ago
Preview
Improved detection of differentially abundant proteins through FDR-control of peptide-identity-propagation Quantitative analysis of proteomics data frequently employs peptide-identity-propagation (PIP) — also known as match-between-runs (MBR) — to increase the number of peptides quantified in a given LC-MS...


How can you transfer peptide IDs between runs and still control your false discovery rate? Till now, the short answer is, you couldn't. Now you can, with PIP-ECHO.

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

23 12 2 0
1 year ago
Wrangling a de novo sequencing benchmark In any machine learning study, high quality data for training and validating the model is critical. This paper describes the result of an iterative process of data wrangling and quality control, which...

Here is the back story behind our recent de novo sequencing benchmark. Science involves a lot of trial and error!

communities.springernature.com/posts/wrangl...

8 9 0 0
2 years ago
Preview
A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution

Lots of people use machine learning to post process mass spectrometry database search results. But why not just use ML as the score function in database search? Turns out it works great! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

4 4 0 0
2 years ago

The best place to do computational biology.

jobs.chronicle.com/job/37553144...

2 0 0 0
2 years ago

Er, let me get back to you on that. 😉

0 0 0 0
2 years ago

People don’t spend enough time looking at the trans contacts in their Hi-C data. There’s gold in them thar hills! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

2 0 0 0