Erik Axel Nielsen's Avatar

Erik Axel Nielsen

@erikaxel.bsky.social

39 Followers  |  147 Following  |  7 Posts  |  Joined: 03.01.2024  |  1.495

Latest posts by erikaxel.bsky.social on Bluesky

Good luck, just finished Chicago Marathon without training the last two months (due to injury) do not recommend. You got this!

12.10.2025 23:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Great, now it seems to work. I need to dig more into the specific violations, but so far so good.

13.05.2025 07:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Tried to run it, but got some errors trying to load the imap library. I assume GitHub issues is the right place for bug reports?

12.05.2025 16:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Poenget er ikke debatten, poenget er valglรธftene. Synes det ville vรฆrt uredelig รฅ gรฅ ut med valglรธfter om endring i skatt og sรฅ binde seg i et bredt forlik rett fรธr valget som gjรธr at man ikke kan fรธlge opp lรธftene sine.

07.03.2025 07:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, I agree it probably is a bit apples to oranges comparison, but found it interesting since 1.7x doesn't seem to absurd given the 2-3x on more "pure" tests, and the 1.26x total effect seems in line with the other samples as well. But real numbers from @push.cx would ofc be even better.

23.01.2025 14:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

PS: This is given that the 1.7x increase for the non-io bound mentioned in your article is comparable to the 1.26x total increase.

23.01.2025 12:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
IO-bound time calculation

Love this! But due to the increases in non-io speed from YJIT it actually seems some applications spend more than 80% waiting for IO. I did the maths for lobsters, and io bound seems to be more than 80% (up from ~65%). Calculations here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets...

23.01.2025 12:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@erikaxel is following 20 prominent accounts