I believe we should do good things even if they are imperfect instead of not doing those good things because we wish reality was different.
03.03.2026 06:28 — 👍 13 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I believe we should do good things even if they are imperfect instead of not doing those good things because we wish reality was different.
03.03.2026 06:28 — 👍 13 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0I wish our grandparents would have built a regional rail system with 75 year bonds that we had to pay for.
03.03.2026 01:45 — 👍 30 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Patrick, I'm the Mayor of a city, not the whole country.
02.03.2026 05:08 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 1"Let them eat cake" but a lot weirder and creepier
01.03.2026 05:31 — 👍 31 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0
I was the only Mayor in the state I'm aware of who spoke in favor of the middle housing bill the year *before* it passed. I'm a big fan of passing good housing policy statewide.
It's the "good" part of that that has me on the other side of this bill.
Yup. I've had multiple friends who want to open shops in Bothell but couldn't, so we lost them. The idea that there's vacant retail just sitting there is laughable here.
All we get is empty walls with a parking garage behind it if we don't mandate retail.
I guess that's what the leg wants 🤷♂️
A lot of builders are going to choose parking instead of housing like they've done in Bothell already. Which I guess we'll then need since people will need to drive more to get to retail instead of walk downstairs.
If you're into car centrism this bill seems like a great way to accomplish it.
The solution to doing bad things is to do good things!
I'd point out that I'm on the side of mixing residential and commercial here and you're on the side of residential only if you want to talk about who's more on the Euclidean side though. 😊
Love this. In a perfect world Euclidean zoning never would have been a thing and we would have functional, liveable cities devoid of need for regulation.
But I operate in reality. And if we want something we need to be able to require it.
New residents deserve abundant housing *and* amenities.
In Bothell we have many blocks that don't require ground floor retail. This is what they look like. Nary a housing unit to be seen. But plenty of parking and hallways!
27.02.2026 21:28 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I wish I shared your optimism for this bill doing more good than harm. But I really do promise I understand that we're in a housing shortage. 😊
27.02.2026 21:24 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
What we should be asking is "is the regulatory burden, on the balance, worth it given all of our priorities" but nobody is having that conversation.
So we've got this bill that will trade retail for parking and internal amenities and maybe a housing unit here and there.
Got it. So no matter what you're not in favor of regulatory burden for any reason because it increases the cost of housing? Because the argument you're making says nothing other than it is regulatory burden. Which nobody is arguing with you about. We all know that.
27.02.2026 20:20 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0So is your fundamental argument that we should require nothing of home builders? Because I'm comfortable with some regulatory burden to create the kind of communities we want to live in. Are you not?
27.02.2026 20:10 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
In Bothell we have one building that has live work units on the ground floor. Currently have people living in them.
But we couldn't require that anymore instead of cheap parking.
Regulatory burden does that. But that's not a subsidy.
You're assuming that builders will build more housing instead of more parking or internal amenities. From what I've seen in Bothell they never choose the housing on the ground floor.
I'd be shocked if this was an impactful housing bill.
You expect builders to charge less than market rent because they saved money on construction out of the goodness of their hearts?
27.02.2026 19:41 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0All the thanks and credit should go to @davina425.bsky.social, not me!
25.02.2026 17:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You guys make me think I should have started a podcast instead of running for office, so cool! :)
24.02.2026 22:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The suburbs keep getting better.
24.02.2026 01:21 — 👍 13 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The formers in Bothell tried to brand us the same way. It's what people who have no actual argument that resonates with voters do. Just flail around making stuff up in public comment.
It's embarrassing for them, especially with the repudiation they got from Woodinville voters a few months ago.
If you want a data point from a suburb, Bothell was around 18% roads, parking, and driveways a couple years ago when we had urban3 do a study for us.
11.02.2026 21:10 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
If only our power structures had the same sort of conviction and righteousness as
*checks again just to make sure*
DinoCon
We're adding two BRT lines and extending a third most of the way through the city north/south over the next few years and are better served by three different transit agencies than most realize. But even without that, I think it's ok to do good things in isolation just because they are good.
08.02.2026 21:52 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I always enjoy chatting with you, so don't feel like the chances are rare. :)
08.02.2026 03:18 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Y'all have done great work in the leg over the last few sessions!
08.02.2026 00:57 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What's going on in Bothell 👇
07.02.2026 21:43 — 👍 62 🔁 10 💬 3 📌 2
*record scratch*
You may be wondering how I got here.
People who don't recognize authority shouldn't be entrusted with authority.
28.01.2026 20:37 — 👍 24 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0