Def

You spend life chewing leaves and wondering why you exist. Then one night, you understand everything… and quietly stop breathing. The bamboo keeps growing. 🐼🖤🌿

Kenneth Starr
Former Independent Counsel and Solicitor General. Brought in by Epstein, high-profile negotiator influencing DOJ strategy and appeals.
He wasn't involved until after the plea deal, but still in the mix.

Jay P. Lefkowitz
Senior partner at Kirkland & Ellis, former colleague of Acosta. Played a key role in shielding the deal from victims and DOJ scrutiny; orchestrated the concealment clause for co-conspirators.

There are a few people besides Acosta and Alan Dershowitz who shouldn't get away.

Judge Marra didn’t void the plea deal because he believed the CVRA didn’t give him the authority to do so, not because the deal was legally sound or ethical.

It’s a procedural limitation, not a validation of the agreement’s fairness or legality.

Bottom Line:
Epstein likely violated the NPA multiple times.
He failed to comply with sex offender laws, misused work release, and by many accounts, continued his criminal enterprise after the deal.

That alone voids the plea deal.

What the flying fuck is even going on..

That Plea Deal was a violation of civil rights done behind the backs of the victims.

A judge already ruled but claimed not to have a way to undo the NPAs. (bullshit, there are easy ways)

DOJ's policy at the time says the deal was dirty.

Pam has the power to not honor the deal or NPAs and indict.

I just rolled my graphics driver back for the fuck of it..

Jensen Huang personally lobbied President Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick

What a goofball Elmo is..

Between 2011 and 2012, Kimbal Musk was dating a woman who was part of Jeffrey Epstein’s entourage and had previously been involved with Epstein himself. That relationship was reportedly arranged by Epstein, who was cultivating ties to the Musk family

Pam “Bish-Ass” Bondi didn’t just look the other way on Epstein — she climbed the ladder he built and took a megaphone to defend the man he trafficked power with.

Get that Plea Deal Voided.

In 2013, Trump’s foundation made a $25,000 illegal donation to a Bondi-linked PAC — right before she decided not to join the Trump University fraud case being pursued by other states.

She was complicit/bought long ago.

She isn't gonna do anything unless we force her into it.

a referee wearing glasses and a striped shirt stands on a field ALT: a referee wearing glasses and a striped shirt stands on a field

Despite national and local pressure, Bondi:

Did not reopen or escalate state-level charges against Epstein.

Did not push for an investigation into how the original plea deal came to be.

Remained silent even as other officials were calling for review and reform.

Key point here about Pam Bish-Ass Bondi.

Pam Bondi became Florida Attorney General in 2011, just as new allegations and victims were surfacing, and Epstein's influence in Florida was still strong.

5. You are going to see that the 2008 Plea deal and the NPA get voided out because it was a Violation of the CVRA.
(Dems didn't create it)

6. We force Pam to indict the protected names in the NPA.

7. Trump's name will be on the NPA list.

8. MAGA will help us drag him out of the White House

Look around out here for the replies from them to his latest Truth Social post.

He's being chewed up by his "truthers" lol
If he's on that list, he's toast with a large section of his base..
(the real crazy ones at that)

a man in a suit and tie says " yep " ALT: a man in a suit and tie says " yep "

Damn right it is lol..

kermit the frog is wearing a black hood and standing next to another frog puppet . ALT: kermit the frog is wearing a black hood and standing next to another frog puppet .

CONCLUSION

The Court should not allow the government to claim impunity for violating the rights of victims. Justice cannot be secret. And it certainly cannot be selectively dispensed for the well-connected.

Respectfully submitted,
George T. Conway III
Amicus Curiae
Dated: [Insert Date]

Where, as here, an agreement is negotiated in violation of law, the court has both the power and the duty to review — and, if necessary, vacate — it.

II. The Court Has Inherent Authority to Vacate an Agreement Procured in Violation of Federal Law
The doctrine of separation of powers does not immunize the Executive from judicial review when it acts in contravention of statutory mandates.

not by oversight, but by design. If this kind of behavior carries no consequence, then the CVRA is meaningless.

ARGUMENT

I. The Government’s Violation of the CVRA Was Not Harmless Error — It Was the Entire Ballgame
The record here makes plain that prosecutors intentionally withheld the existence and terms of the NPA from victims —

The CVRA is not a ceremonial suggestion. It is a binding law, enacted by Congress, designed to prevent precisely this sort of abuse: the quiet disposal of justice behind closed doors, out of sight of the very people the law was meant to protect.

The government has conceded as much. Yet it argues that, despite this violation of the victims’ statutory rights, there is no remedy. That cannot be and was never intended to be — the law.

extended to unnamed “potential co-conspirators” was negotiated and executed in secret, deliberately circumventing the requirements of the CVRA.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

The 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) entered into between the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein and, disturbingly,

This case presents a rare and deeply troubling example of an agreement that was not only legally questionable but morally indefensible. That it was concealed from the very victims whose interests Congress intended to protect under the CVRA makes it all the more urgent to rectify.

Amicus curiae has no financial interest in the outcome of this matter but asserts a profound interest in ensuring that federal prosecutors remain accountable to both the public and the law.

INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE
George T. Conway III is an attorney with decades of experience in constitutional litigation, civil procedure, and federal practice. He submits this brief as a private citizen concerned with the proper enforcement of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”) and the rule of law

*hint hint*
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Case: Jane Doe 1 & 2 v. United States
Amicus Curiae Brief of George T. Conway III in Support of Petitioners