Lovely stuff this. Go Curtin!
Another paper that has been a huge fight, but a good outcome in the end. Boom!
pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/...
#geology #meteorite #this_one_is_not_a_crater
If anybody would like to read our @nature.com paper "Formation and composition of Earth’s Hadean protocrust", led by Simon Turner, you can do so here...
rdcu.be/ef9MB
#geology #science #early_earth #impacts
#Collab with the Geological Survey of WA we have 2 fully funded #PhD positions available looking at the "Tectonic Evolution and Geochronology of the Yilgarn Craton" a world famous mineral endowed classic.
www.earthworks-jobs.com/geoscience/c...
@geochronchris.bsky.social @bribeiro.bsky.social
Granulite-facies coprolite?
Fun, indeed. Having been to North Pole, and the Pilbara more generally (long ago) - I was v keen to hear detail about the idea it had been massively whacked by an extraterrestrial bolide 3.5 bn years ago.
Fun interview with @peaseroland.bsky.social from the BBC on the North Pole crater (beginning ~20 minutes in)…
www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/...
Excellent chat!
Rocks from 700 million years ago hold the clues. From glaciers bulldozing landscapes to meltwater rivers flushing chemical elements into the oceans = it’s a story of how land, sea, and sky are all geochemically connected. theconversation.com/giant-glacie...
love the use of 'potential' :)
would love a trip down there some day...
Regarding our recent paper…
rdcu.be/ecqYe
…look at these lovely shatter cones in 3D. Lovely stuff…
sketchfab.com/3d-models/sh...
In answer to your second question, no, it cannot.
No, it isn’t. At least when treated in isolation. We have argued that the wider Pilbara Craton formed above a giant impact at 3.55 Ga. The smaller North Pole crater, about which we write, formed some 80 Myr later. If that seems an unlikely coincidence, look at the Moon…
diapiric rise...