Honestly a good review article requires far more independent analysis than summary of the literature as such. You’re still making an argument.
When I go to the ED they do a pregnancy test on me.
Congress built an elaborate system to check the President and SCOTUS shat on it.
Thank the Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha
““Freedom of the press” in bourgeois society means freedom for the rich systematically, unremittingly, daily, in millions of copies, to deceive, corrupt and fool the exploited and oppressed mass of the people, the poor.”
“All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.”
-V.I. Lenin
6/ “When I arrived every night I cried and now I don’t sleep well, I felt that being here was my fault and I only wanted to be on vacation like a normal family.”
9-year-old Maria Antonia Guerra Montoya, detained on her way to Disney World, spent 113+ days at Dilley.
They should deny him supply. One of the oldest constitutional mechanisms against a tyrant.
Americans slowly realizing that there’s a whole world of politics outside of the endless horse race is a wonderful thing.
Red Star is also ML. There’s also a solid amount of dual card people with Communist Party USA but I’m not sure if they tend to also join a DSA caucus.
The media largely being owned by their ultra wealthy friends probably has something to do with it.
Do they have dues at least?
We already have extensive antimicrobial stewardship programs. Heck even in hospitals there’s a lot of antibiotics you can’t use without infectious disease signing off.
To some extent, this speaks to the need to create an ideological media universe to push our goals, the same way the right does.
I think part of this is corporate control of media, but I also think public opinion is fickle in a way that can be a real challenge for continuous ideological processes.
Everything is stupider than we want to believe. This would be a hit.
After becoming a congressional leader, a politician’s stock portfolio beats out those of peers by 47 (!!!) percentage points a year through trades timed around bills and firms that later get government contracts
www.nber.org/papers/w34524
via @florianederer.bsky.social
I can only really think of time pressure being relevant in a very small proportion of fields. Air traffic control, maybe pathology or radiology? Not relevant in most of medicine. Accommodations should be addressed with more care in those contexts. Otherwise, the time limit is meaningless.
Which is interesting because most good medical schools will intentionally develop exams without time pressure, and to the extent there's time pressure on medical licensing exams it's *mostly* so you can get the test done in a single working day.
Generally, if time is a significant factor on an exam, it's poorly designed! Maybe this isn't true for some standardized tests, but I would be surprised if the purpose wasn't almost always convenience of proctoring. (Maybe some exceptions are high acuity fields or language proficiency tests)
The general membership seems more “ultraliberal” as it were than any of the major caucuses.
That being said, the actual practice of the often poorly politically educated broad DSA membership often doesn’t really reflect the preferences of any of the caucuses, which are typically formed of people with more political education.
What Is to Be Done and its concept that the working class can only achieve trade union consciousness without an organized and ideologically disciplined party is the foundation of the DSA left. DSA itself is an uneasy synthesis of these tendencies much like the prewar SDP or RSDLP.
I think this is an inaccurate characterization of the political tradition of the left caucuses. They’re (mostly) rooted in a Leninist and/or early Kautskyite interpretation of party and class organizations which is neither the “shop floor” politics of the DSA right or ultraliberal progressivism.
There are parallels to Hindenburg's camarilla here.
And doctors routinely validate notes already. Standard practice in many settings is for a resident to write a note the attending signs off on. This would still save time.
It is perfectly plausible that an LLM could summarize a conversation well enough within our risk tolerance, especially if it lets doctors see twice as many patients. We’re not there yet!
Diagnosis is another question entirely.
This is not that demanding a task for an LLM, but getting it consistently right enough to be part of the medical record is a challenge.
Medical notes are not written in a dictation format (except sometimes in surgery). You actually do need an LLM to translate a conversation into a SOAP note.
That stuff I wouldn’t consider “AI” as such.