Literally laughing my backside off...
03.03.2026 11:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Literally laughing my backside off...
03.03.2026 11:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 040% more sounds a lot like one of the ligands is missing?
20.02.2026 09:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And 40 odd percent Mg? By weight or molar? Or was it that, what they confused?
20.02.2026 08:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Is it a pure compound or mixed with something else, say carbonate/oxide?
20.02.2026 07:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yep. I once saw a talk at a conference showing a crystal structure of isolated coordination complexes with a profoundly molecular UV-VIS spectrum, where the authors tried to determine an optical bandgap.
19.02.2026 00:47 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I wonder if you have the option to hand abstracts over to other suitable sessions? I remember that some sessions were not completely using all their talk slots, while others were packed with abstracts in Melbourne.
19.02.2026 00:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Maybe you would like to invite fellow X to attend?
22.01.2026 15:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And hand the golf courses over to Denmark?
20.01.2026 04:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Same here, though I was even more irritated when I found out that IUCr journals are using that, too. I specifically asked, after they changed my draft.
14.11.2025 04:26 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hahaha! I just saw the question mark at the end of the first sentence. How am I supposed to know if they are short of articles?
08.11.2025 15:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Btw. I am intending to disappoint whoever "us" is referring to. Sorry...
08.11.2025 15:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Screenshot of a mail from an allegedly ransom journal starting with "Dear Dr. Respected Author" and containing the phrase "We hope you don't disappoint us."
The address is (science) comedy gold, though I have to be exact and demand that it should be "Dear Prof. Respected Author".
08.11.2025 15:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I am not sure about treating their pattern as two independent structures despite being related through a group-subgroup relationship. Would need to check if there isn't a subgroup that explains all reflections.
31.10.2025 05:08 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes, I do have questions.
31.10.2025 05:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Invitation for the "Journal of Skeleton System"
Clearly, I am more flattered by some journal invitations than by others. However, I cannot take the fame for this one, since the article "Customizing Multicolored Orbital Angular Momentum Combs" that the skeletons lived so much is nothing I ever published...
18.10.2025 15:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is that the one opposite park bar?
11.10.2025 05:30 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Or to put it more profanely: I'd rather thank the engineer than the screwdriver for holding my wheels in place.
10.10.2025 05:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Not a fan of the premise - a machine does not invent or craft anything, it does what it is told and built to do.
The precision of e.g. James Webb is neither a coincidence nor it's own achievement, but a result of scientists' development. Those building such machines should get the acclaim.
Hey @nobelprize.bsky.social committee! Just in case you might want to talk: I have a lecture on Wednesday from 12pm, please call beforehand.
06.10.2025 04:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
In reporting this piece on the new trial for a Huntington's treatment, I was struck by one thing in particular:
The joy.
One of my sources wept for joy. He has spent his entire career studying this disease, he said it was the happiest day. www.sciencenews.org/article/hunt...
How would that be different from refining the crystallite fractions from Rietveld refinement? It's true, you get a volume fraction from that, which can be calculated into a mass fraction. Maybe Vaclav Petricek (Prague) of the Jana team might be a good address to speak to?
22.09.2025 08:54 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Actually, shouldn't the scattering probability be somehow proportional to the absorption cross section?
22.09.2025 07:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Let me think, I believe what you describe is being used somehow to reconstruct domains in metal samples. But I have not seen anyone using it for determining amorphous fractions.
22.09.2025 06:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Nope, Not in the way you do for SAXS. The trouble with single crystals is that (unless they are spheres), the beam path through the crystal has different lengths for each reflection, hence they are differently attenuated. Rarely a problem for organics, but massive for heavy absorbers.
22.09.2025 04:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I can see some defects in the pattern...
15.09.2025 05:30 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Und wenn der Engel Cosimo Anja Rützel Jr die Bücher Trashus und Realitus überreichen würde?
07.09.2025 19:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ist es wie in diesem einen Lied? Ist Böhmermann Schuld?
07.09.2025 03:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Unsolicited email from an allegedly ransom journal with an invitation to the special issue "orbital".
Hm, I am inclined to contribute an article entitled "The best orbital: yes, there is a correct answer!"
Any further ideas?
However, will have to ask for a full fee waiver - I can't afford these highly specialised journals.