Follow along as @publicknowledge.bsky.social colleague @mrose.ink tracks the insights from the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime & Terrorism hearing on AI and copyright
16.07.2025 16:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@lisahmacpherson.bsky.social
Former CMO, now Policy Director at Public Knowledge (but my skeets are my own). I’m new here. Be nice.
Follow along as @publicknowledge.bsky.social colleague @mrose.ink tracks the insights from the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime & Terrorism hearing on AI and copyright
16.07.2025 16:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And @nickgarcia.bsky.social dissects two recent court cases in his post, "Courts Agree: AI Training Ruled As Fair Use in Bartz v. Anthropic and Kadrey v. Meta” 3/3
publicknowledge.org/courts-agree...
Offering two recent @publicknowledge.bsky.social posts that are relevant to the topic.
First, colleague @mrose.ink assesses the recent Copyright Office report on AI and copyright in her post, “The Fatal Failures of the Copyright Office’s Report on AI" ... 2/3
publicknowledge.org/the-fatal-fa...
Today (and new time of 12pm): Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism hearing, "Too Big to Prosecute?: Examining the AI Industry’s Mass Ingestion of Copyrighted Works for AI Training." 1/3
www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-ac...
The Copyright Office finally released its long-awaited third installment on AI and fair use. But while the top-line conclusions were generally on point, the reasoning in their analysis misses the mark. The latest from @mrose.ink:
publicknowledge.org/the-fatal-fa...
The FTC's proposed "click-to-cancel" rule would have been a great move for consumer protection. But when it came time to defend the measure in court, the Commission dropped the ball completely. Read the latest from @bergmayer.net:
publicknowledge.org/why-click-to...
Last week, federal judges released two landmark decisions on artificial intelligence — both finding that AI training on copyrighted works is a protected fair use. Read the breakdown from @nickgarcia.bsky.social on what these rulings mean as well as their limitations at the link below:
03.07.2025 19:45 — 👍 3 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0The Senate just passed its budget bill, including efforts to auction off public spectrum. Under this text, the FCC could be forced to sell off as much as half of the currently unlicensed spectrum in the 6 GHz band -- which could lead to slower Wi-Fi. publicknowledge.org/public-knowl...
01.07.2025 16:25 — 👍 17 🔁 11 💬 0 📌 2To be clear, this AI moratorium language that was struck from the Senate budget bill had NOTHING to do with AI development or innovation. Rather, it was an attempt to prevent states from regulating *anything* that could be perceived as touching an AI system at the state level.
01.07.2025 12:44 — 👍 8 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0As predicted, the FTC issued a consent order requiring ad agencies not “boycott” online publishers. But it ignores far more likely impacts of the merger on competition. My @publicknowledge.bsky.social colleague @elisephillips.bsky.social and I break it down.
publicknowledge.org/update-the-f...
Typically, wonderfully spicy (and accurate) take on the “Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes” (PRO CODES) Act from @publicknowledge.bsky.social colleague @mrose.ink Can't think of a less accurately named act. #DontPaywallTheLaw
27.06.2025 14:54 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Thanks to @amyklobuchar.com, Marsha Blackburn, & @blumenthal.senate.gov for reintroducing the Open App Markets Act to reduce gatekeeper power and realize the promise of true competition in the app economy. 🎉 Great step toward market fairness! publicknowledge.org/public-knowl...
26.06.2025 16:08 — 👍 4 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0These may well be means of competition for platforms (most product features are, regardless of industry), but as in other industries they may also represent a path to product liability for platforms. Read more here publicknowledge.org/safeguarding...
17.06.2025 21:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Examples from current cases include ineffective parental controls, ineffective parental notifications, barriers that make it more difficult for users to delete and/or deactivate their accounts than to create them, and platform-created filters that allow users to manipulate their appearance. 5/6
17.06.2025 21:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Instead, our product liability theory holds that some harms can be caused by product design features that are rooted in the platforms’ ad-based business model and the need to sustain user attention - but have nothing to do with particular content or content curation. 4/6
17.06.2025 21:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Importantly, we do *not* include algorithmic serving or amplification of user content in our definition of product design under this theory. We agree these refer to content liability and are protected by both #Section230 and 1A. 3/6
17.06.2025 21:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Our product liability theory at @publicknowledge.bsky.social holds that platforms’ design features – separate and distinct from the nature of the content they serve to users, or how they serve it – can create harms, and that platforms should be liable for the harms their design features cause. 2/6
17.06.2025 21:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A very interesting thesis, but it fails to differentiate - as some judges have begun to do - between "algorithmic curation" and product design features that have nothing to do with serving content. We wrote about this, too. 1/6
Is Internet Content Too Engaging? www.lawfaremedia.org/article/is-i...
I know a little something about advertising - and the FTC's premise that ad agencies "boycott" tech platforms "by refusing to place their clients’ advertisements on them" is BS. The FTC uses “boycott” like they use “censorship” - as a cudgel to further the Trump administration’s goals. More here 🧵
17.06.2025 16:36 — 👍 0 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1Opposition to the 10-year moratorium on state laws regulating AI keeps growing.
To keep you up-to-date with the lawmakers, leaders, and advocacy groups speaking out, we’re launching NoAILawBan.org. Visit for a quick guide to who’s opposing the AI law ban.
“This isn’t your traditional Washington doyenne’s helmet-like bob…It’s touchable and time-consuming. It flows like disinformation.”
Brilliant essay from Mattie Kahn.
www.townandcountrymag.com/style/beauty...
The FTC had a comment call to investigate whether content moderation might constitute an unfair / deceptive business practice, & whether platforms might be engaging in anticompetitive acts.
It inspired me to look at moderation of the lab leak hypothesis…
open.substack.com/pub/agentsof...
"...the CEOs of the big platforms have given up....whether it’s Zuck throwing fact-checkers under the bus or Altman deciding he wants a cut of the impersonation industry, CEOs have decided they're no longer interested in reducing the prevalence of disinformation."
www.niemanlab.org/2025/05/how-...
Public Knowledge Policy Director @lisahmacpherson.bsky.social writes for @techpolicypress.bsky.social that nearly a decade's worth of research indicates that not only do tech platforms advantage right-wing content, but social media moderation disproportionately silences marginalized voices instead:
20.05.2025 21:51 — 👍 13 🔁 9 💬 0 📌 0Public Knowledge Policy Director @lisahmacpherson.bsky.social joins @techpolicypress.bsky.social to review the history behind the FTC’s request on tech "censorship," & suggests ways the agency could use its authority to actually improve content moderation and ensure free speech on platforms:
21.05.2025 19:28 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0What if Google Chrome were no longer owned by Google? In the wake of the ruling in US v. Google, this could become a reality — and should, in order to effectively curb their monopoly power in the search and digital advertising markets. Read the latest from Policy Counsel @elisephillips.bsky.social:
20.05.2025 20:13 — 👍 6 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0Unfortunately, AI slop isn't just online. Original reporting by @404media.co: "many of the books on the reading list [produced by King Features, a subsidiary of Hearst] either do not exist or were written by other authors than the ones they are attributed to."
www.niemanlab.org/2025/05/you-...
I appreciate you
09.05.2025 01:10 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🚨 Today, Public Knowledge joined 16 other public interest, consumer rights, & library groups in urging FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson to protect consumers in the digital marketplace by establishing clear ground rules for digital ownership and sales of goods.
07.05.2025 19:24 — 👍 10 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0🧵1/ Near the end of the 118th Congress, we introduced a framework to evaluate legislation addressing AI-generated digital replicas. Since then, momentum has grown — fast. And last week, Congress passed the first-ever law on the issue: the #TAKEITDOWNAct.
06.05.2025 17:00 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 1