This is evil. Is this how a so called "Christian" nation treats the most vulnerable among us? Matthew 25:44-45 makes it very clear our obligation to the downtrodden.
22.01.2026 06:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@ankoch.bsky.social
This is evil. Is this how a so called "Christian" nation treats the most vulnerable among us? Matthew 25:44-45 makes it very clear our obligation to the downtrodden.
22.01.2026 06:23 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Greenland does not belong to us and it never will. Get over it. Worry about making the country better instead of doing your best to destroy it.
07.01.2026 04:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That's just one part of our global supply chain that would be utterly destroyed. The president is threatening to destroy the modern American way of life just to satisfy his fragile ego and petty greed. And the worst part of it is that a good portion of the country is cheering him along.
07.01.2026 04:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We know that they have the ability to remotely disable all their equipment, as they have consistently threatened to do that to Taiwan should China invade. What makes you think they wouldn't do it to us if we invade Europe?
07.01.2026 04:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0As just a single example, try to imagine what would happen to our consumer electronics if the Dutch-based ASML decided to no longer do business with US companies. I'll give you a hint: It means no more modern microchips.
07.01.2026 04:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Let there be no mistake. Trump is threatening war with Europe. I don't think people fully understand how such an action would cause inestimable harm to the US.
07.01.2026 04:25 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This foreign involvement is going to backfire spectacularly. This will do nothing but hurt the interests of the United States. We are hurting our international image and spending military resources on issues that don't matter when we have larger looming issues on the horizon. Plus, it's just wrong.
03.01.2026 08:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0To head off the counterargument, past presidents have indeed twisted existing authorizations to suit their purposes, but this goes way beyond what has been done previously. This is a clear overreach by the executive branch. I see no legal justification for this use of military force.
03.01.2026 08:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The open-source intel reports are that there are Chinooks and special forces on the ground. This sounds a lot like an invasion to me. Maduro is not a nice guy, but this is not okay. The authority to invade a country lies with Congress. Congress must weigh in on these actions, one way or another.
03.01.2026 08:21 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So, for the time being, these individuals will have to live with the fact that they failed to have the courage to say no when it mattered, violated their oath, and flagrantly disregarded the Navy's core values.
29.11.2025 04:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Unfortunately, the Attorney General would need to bring charges against this (per 18 U.S. Code Β§ 2441), and we know that won't happen. There likely won't even be an investigation. Nevertheless, they know what they did was profoundly wrong, as shown by ADM Bradley's retirement shortly afterwards.
29.11.2025 04:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is why that video on illegal orders was released. This is an illegal order that was given and followed. Everyone in the chain of command who was complicit in this execution of these shipwreck survivors, from Secretary Hegseth to ADM Bradley to the Navy SEALs, should be held accountable.
29.11.2025 04:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is an order that is illegal to verbalize or write, let alone carry out successfully. There is no situation in which it is legal to kill unarmed, shipwrecked survivors (those who are hors de combat). Nobody in the chain of command can claim ignorance, as this is a patently illegal order.
29.11.2025 04:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If this is true, and I honestly have little doubt it is based on how they speak about these attacks, this is unambiguously a war crime. It is a clear violation of both the Hague Convention of 1907 and the Geneva Conventions of 1949, violations of which are illegal under 18 U.S. Code Β§ 2441.
29.11.2025 04:55 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0While tthe Republicans will hold the ultimate responsibility, the Democrats' lack of a spine is going to be final nail in the coffin for democracy. Perhaps not in this specific case, but ultimately it will continue to allow Trump and company to continue their authoritarian rise.
09.11.2025 22:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It certainly looks like the Democrats are going to cave. They managed to last this long, which is surprising to me. What isn't surprising is that they are going to end up accepting a deal that offers them nothing in return. That's par for the course for them.
09.11.2025 22:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I was rewatching A Few Good Men and realized that in today's military, Colonel Jessup would be given a pardon and held up as a standard of how military officers are supposed to act. Current leadership seems to think that the ends justify the means and that people must be toughened up by any means.
27.10.2025 01:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iconoclasm at its finest. A major motivation for this is simply to spread hatred and stoke anger. Another article quotes Josh Hawley on this topic, "I saw it today. It looks fantastic. I'm delighted he is doing it, and I love seeing these liberals melt down."
22.10.2025 22:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for CPR and ECC have been released!
22.10.2025 15:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1An illegal action is only illegal if it's unpopular? I suppose that's true when the rule of law breaks down.
15.10.2025 04:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I suppose now we start to see the arrest of peaceful protestors? How long before we see the next Boston or Kent State massacre?
15.10.2025 02:12 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0This seems to be, unfortunately, flying under the radar in the US. It's very concerning.
20.09.2025 00:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0βIβm also going after their business licenses and permitting, their businesses will be blacklisted aggressively, they should be kicked from every school, and their drivers licenses should be revoked,β he wrote on X.
This man is mentally unwell. Hopefully, he can someday get the help that he needs.
If we're firing news personalities for hateful speech, can we do this one next? I feel like calling for homeless people to undergo "involuntary lethal injection" and for us to "just kill them" is actually worse than what Matthew Dowd said.
13.09.2025 20:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0That extends to any legal, even if unpopular, speech conducted as a private citizen (as is everything I post on social media) and not as a representative of the government.
12.09.2025 22:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The First Amendment, along with the Hatch Act, permits DoD civilians (and other federal employees) to express themselves during their off-duty time. It is well established that it is illegal to fire federal employees for expressing their views or engaging in constitutionally protected speech.
12.09.2025 22:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is also a great example of the weaponization of the federal government, something they falsely claim to be against.
12.09.2025 22:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is another example of the GOP's war on the freedom of speech and expression. They absolutely HATE that people are still allowed to disagree with them. They are very much in favor of cancel culture. In fact, it seems they are one of its largest supporters.
12.09.2025 22:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Adding a screenshot, just so the picture is included. He wants to see Chicago burn.
06.09.2025 18:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0