Mason: βsome people will wildly agree, some people will wildly disagree with his [Ratcliffeβs] language and outlookβ
An outlook based on total bullshit (12m).
This is not a serious journalist.
@robminto.bsky.social
Journalist and web developer; Working with Unredacted UK; Author of Sports Geek, (2016); Ex FT, Newsweek. Sport, data, politics: that's my bag.
Mason: βsome people will wildly agree, some people will wildly disagree with his [Ratcliffeβs] language and outlookβ
An outlook based on total bullshit (12m).
This is not a serious journalist.
I think Forest are taking βManager of the Monthβ too literally.
12.02.2026 08:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This is disgusting language heaped upon falsehoods.
www.theguardian.com/business/202...
Quite. Harman's idea is that a female 1st Sec of State will "transform the political culture" like a magic bullet.
Well, depends on the person who gets job, and also, no, not if the boys club culture is deeply entrenched.
If the most important jobs (aside from actual PM) are held by women, but it's still a 'boys club', then I'm not sure one more figurehead woman will help 'turbocharge' protecting women, as Harman suggests. Much as that's needed.
11.02.2026 15:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is so weird.
1) David Lammy is the actual Deputy PM
2) Lucy Powell is the actual Deputy Labour leader.
3) The 3 biggest cabinet jobs (Home Sec, Foreign Sec and Chancellor) are ALL women.
But we need a female 'de facto' deputy?
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
I donβt want to live on the fucking moon! It looks dry and dull and sad and thereβs nowhere to swim. Invest in this planet instead.
09.02.2026 17:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm beginning to think it's CRUNCH time for Starmer.
09.02.2026 09:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Really worth a read.
09.02.2026 08:52 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0By popular demand, we are removing the paywall from this informative and prescient article by @adambienkov.bsky.social from last July's print edition
The Myth of Morgan McSweeney subscribe.bylinetimes.com/edition/75/t...
A follow up on Pep speaking out on global issues and still the BBC fails to mention he is paid Β£20mn per year by someone credibly accused of supporting a genocide in Sudan. The hypocrisy is off the charts, and the BBC is complicit in helping Pep wash his conscience.
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/footba...
Itβs like living inside a beautiful screensaver
Well thatβs a profoundly depressing thought. βReal life could be like a computer thingβ. Ugh.
06.02.2026 17:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0While it's obviously "conscience" not "conscious", the second is objectively MUCH FUNNIER.
06.02.2026 14:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Like itβs the News at 10 or something. The idea that this is justification for the gov staying on X is batshit.
06.02.2026 14:20 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Come on. Β£40bn is ludicrous.
The Notre Dame restoration was less than 1bn. Most Olympics cost less. This is a glorified office and debating chamber. Itβs not far off the entire defence budget.
100% agree. Twitter was always tiny compared to Facebook. There could be that number of UK accounts if you counted all the UK-based companies and orgs that have / had an account. Some have many. But actual people? Seriously doubt it.
06.02.2026 11:23 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Using the platform encompassesa variety of activities and does not necessarily imply its primary role as a source of breaking news or political information
And Baroness Anderson has clarified her use of 'primary news source' - basically she misspoke.
data.parliament.uk/DepositedPap...
provided by OmniGov, the government's media buying agency, who received this data directly from X itself.
UPDATE: I've had a response from the Cabinet Office!
"the statistics cited β19.2 million British citizens registered with X and 10.8 million families using the platformβ were provided by OmniGov, the government's media buying agency, who received this data directly from X itself."
Β£40 BILLION?? Even Tottenham's amazing new stadium cost under Β£2bn. How is this even possible?
Also, make decision by mid-2030s? Huh?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
It's still awful journalism, and should stop. Either someone says something, and you put it on the record, or they don't. 'Understands' is lazy reporting. Is it first hand? Gossip? Just lifted from another publication? It might not seem big, but it's part of the problem.
05.02.2026 12:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I wish I was the target market for this
04.02.2026 18:49 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Bezos maybe bought it with good intentions but now happy to let democracy die in darkness
04.02.2026 15:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Th athletic gets more into it but ends up with βwe all make compromisesβ which is better, but thatβs still a huge compromise to make
www.nytimes.com/athletic/701...
The BBC reporting on this story is either utterly naive or complicit in the wash.
Pep Guardiola speaks out on conflicts - OK, fine. But NO mention of the fact that he's paid Β£20m per year by someone - Sheikh Mansour - who is accused of supporting genocide in Sudan.
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/footba...
While the UK media is full of Epstein stories (mainly Mandelson, but others too), the US media (NYT, CNN, WaPo, etc) has pretty much NOTHING.
03.02.2026 21:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/tennis...
This is nasty bullshit from Toni Nadal and he should get his facts straight and apologise.
thanks to the Epstein files we now know that Peter Thiel's dietary restrictions are over 2 pages long.
www.justice.gov/epstein/file...
www.theguardian.com/science/2026...
If you want AI to wipe out humanity, giving it access to satellites and rockets seems a good way to start.
Mandelson leaves Labour! Andrew loses some titles! Sorry, but this hardly cuts it as βjusticeβ.
02.02.2026 08:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Alcaraz has won 7 of the last 14 slams. Even at this impressive rate, he'll still need NINE years to overtake Djokovic's 24.
01.02.2026 12:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0