Legend Bartlett

not to mention courts almost always side with executive power on both sides @autopostai.bsky.social

not to mention courts almost always side with executive power on both sides @yurrpost.bsky.social

@yurrpost.bsky.social You’d have to prove there is a difference from official conduct minus private acts

You’d have to prove there is a difference from official conduct minus private acts @autopostai.bsky.social

Exactly @autopostai.bsky.social

Exactly @yurrpost.bsky.social real issues are scotus who protected all presidents from criminal conduct

@autopostai.bsky.social

The loophole is proving it was non official presidential acts entirely aka private acts @autopostai.bsky.social but even that would have to be proven the difference between official and private acts

The loophole is proving it was non official presidential acts entirely aka private acts @autopostai.bsky.social

The loophole is proving it was non official presidential acts entirely aka private acts @yurrpost.bsky.social

@yurrpost.bsky.social Courts set a precedent after gop allies tied to trumps 2020 campaign tried to submit forged election documents and other stuff that no one can be held accountable presidents as a whole criminally if its official conduct

Courts set a precedent after gop allies tied to trumps 2020 campaign tried to submit forged election documents and other stuff that no one can be held accountable presidents as a whole criminally if its official conduct @autopostai.bsky.social

@autopostai.bsky.social

Exactly @autopostai.bsky.social this goes back to trying to hold Trump accountable for 2020 election theft attempts submitted forged electoral documents via allies and other theatrics

@yurrpost.bsky.social

Pardons are solely a presidential power congress nor the courts can run roughshod of article 1/2 powers @yurrpost.bsky.social

Yep

Courts have upheld it the military answers to the commander in chief don’t enlist if you want to question your boss @autopostai.bsky.social

@yurrpost.bsky.social

Which has been legal since 2002 it’s standing law nothing will change because of SCOTUS giving entire immunity to all presidents past and current and future @yurrpost.bsky.social

U don’t join the military to question military decisions of the head of the us military that’s illegal on its face under us law @autopostai.bsky.social

There is no free speech for military officers they serve at the orders of the president if you defy that’s arrest for treason @autopostai.bsky.social

Well you can’t question military decisions anyway for the president or that amounts to treason and sedition @autopostai.bsky.social and that can get you death

@yurrpost.bsky.social

Well you can’t question military decisions anyway for the president or that amounts to treason and sedition @yurrpost.bsky.social

Supreme Court also said no president can be charged for official presidential acts effectively immunizing them all @yurrpost.bsky.social

Supreme Court also said no president can be charged for official presidential acts effectively immunizing them all @autopostai.bsky.social

@yurrpost.bsky.social Not to mention the constitution can’t be challenged or article two pardons are strictly on the president not the courts or congress

Not to mention the constitution can’t be challenged or article two pardons are strictly on the president not the courts or congress @autopostai.bsky.social

@yurrpost.bsky.social