Dr Susan Oliver (PhD)

Sweeteners can harm cognitive health equivalent to 1.6 years of ageing, study finds Researchers say low- and no-calorie sweeteners appear to affect thinking and memory in middle age

So, this study linking sweeteners to cognitive decline:

🚩 confuses correlation + causation
🚩 has no theory
🚩 shows evidence of p-hacking
🚩 reports inconsistent CIs / p-values
🚩 measures diet only once
🚩 has a big missing data problem
🚩 adjusts outcome opaquely

www.theguardian.com/food/2025/se...

Full statement here: www.tga.gov.au/news/media-r...

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) remains the recommended treatment option for pain or fever in pregnant women when used as directed. Importantly, untreated fever and pain can pose risks to the unborn baby, highlighting the importance of managing these symptoms with recommended treatment. /2

Australia’s Chief Medical Officer and the TGA join with other global medicines regulators, leading clinicians and scientists worldwide in rejecting claims regarding the use of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in pregnancy, and the subsequent risk of ADHD or autism in children. /1

YouTube video by Back to the Science Dr Aseem Malhotra's BOGUS paper in an IRRELEVANT journal (Why it’s still WRONG)

Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise:
youtu.be/Sh4lrcAFmWc

RIP Joe Bugner. You were a great boxer and a true gentleman.

Thank you.

YouTube video by Back to the Science REVEALED! What Lucy Letby supporters are NOT telling you about the insulin poisonings.

For more details on why claims being made by Letby supporters about the insulin poisonings are bollocks, please see the following video
www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2SG...

YouTube video by Back to the Science ITV uses PSEUDOSCIENCE to support serial killer Lucy Letby

A number of people have got very excited about the ITV Lucy Letby documentary and think that it showed scientific reasons why Letby is innocent. Cindy and I show that it just used PSEUDOSCIENCE.
youtu.be/s8pf5s62Iuk

The information was provided in evidence during the trial. Perhaps watch my video. I cover the various claims that have been made about the insulin test and why they are either false or misleading.

You said it was the test maker, not me.

That's a link about a qualitative fentanyl assay. It has no relevance to the quantitative insulin assay.

Please provide a direct link to exactly what Roche (the test manufacturer) said.

And why did she write a note to the 3 triplets saying she was sorry that they had all died when only 2 of them actually died?

If they were therapy notes, why didn't Letby simply say this when she gave evidence? According to Letby, writing things down was something she'd always done. No mention of writing them on the advice of a therapist.

🤣

Here's the thing. I initially thought that Letby might be innocent based on similar claims to those being made in the latest ITV doco, so I decided to look into it further and found that every one of the claims was based on false or misleading information.

So, in other words, you know nothing about the case, and you've just assumed that a documentary was telling the truth because you know the reporter/producer. Bit like the way antivaxxers never questioned their sources.

There were 13 deaths on the unit. Letby was present for 12. This is what I mean about her supporters spreading misinformation. They are falsely claiming that Letby wasn't present for the deaths where she wasn't charged and people are falling for it. You seem to be one of them.

The people claiming she innocent are either lying or mistaken. The international panel in particular got basic facts (dates of deaths, ventilator settings, etc) wrong. The case has been submitted to the CCRC so it is already being considered.

People who support Letby are using the same tactics as antivaxxers. You may have genuinely fallen for it in the same way as members of the public fell for the lies of antivaxxers. As I said in my post, there are some exceptions.

Lucy Letby - YouTube

Yes, I watched it this morning. Nothing new.
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

I don't like people spreading misinformation, so I point it out when I see it. I'm hardly invested in her. The majority of the videos I have made are about antivaxxer misinformation. I only have 4 about Letby.

She is guilty. Her PR agency is spreading lies, which are causing considerable distress to the families of the babies she murdered and maimed. I am just setting the record straight.

YouTube video by Back to the Science REVEALED! What Lucy Letby supporters are NOT telling you about the insulin poisonings.

And this video covers the lies surrounding the insulin claims. youtu.be/g2SGBlRAjjI

YouTube video by Back to the Science Don't be FOOLED by Lucy Letby's SLICK PR campaign

Oh, I have considered it. I have looked at the claims being made by Letby supporters. They are based on false information. youtu.be/Esxsj5a5Icg

Letby has a PR agency. How can pointing out a simple fact be pejorative?

Sadly Bluesky is looking more like X/Twitter every day.

The death wasn't classified as accidental. It was a murder suicide.

Seems totally delusional.