Her work is great, and she's here on BlueSky! @ellecordova.bsky.social
04.03.2026 23:43 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@andymiller24.bsky.social
Retired from EPA Office of Research and Development, focused on climate change issues. Active with US Global Change Research Program, interested in climate intervention. University of Arizona, North Carolina State University, mechanical engineer
Her work is great, and she's here on BlueSky! @ellecordova.bsky.social
04.03.2026 23:43 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Try this: data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/ar6_wg1...
Figure SPM.8 (v20210809)
And less expensive!
04.03.2026 11:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I "liked," while hoping I'm not among the most egregious offenders...
04.03.2026 11:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I suppose it's being sensitive to the survivors to avoid explicitly stating the fact that the CWG's demise was self-inflicted.
02.03.2026 18:07 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excellent article by @bobkopp.net describing the attacks on climate science by the Trump administration and calling for the research community to find a better strategy to respond. Articles like this are a critical to letting people know the full scope of what's being done to science.
02.03.2026 17:59 β π 10 π 6 π¬ 0 π 0Nice article on the phys.org site summarizing a detailed rebuttal by Santer et al. of one of the erroneous claims in last year's deeply flawed DOE report. As Santer notes, the report is still on the DOE website, implying (incorrectly) that the report meets federal information quality requirements.
01.03.2026 21:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Just wild speculation, but my guess is that DoD would handily defeat CPB in a real fight.
27.02.2026 16:42 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Excellent article from @sundogplanets.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy describing why we need to think of near-Earth orbit as part of our environment and what we need to do to protect it.
27.02.2026 13:49 β π 1 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Excited to let you all know that I had the chance to talk about the Endangerment Finding with @flichtman.bsky.social on @scifri.bsky.social! It's up on their website now: www.sciencefriday.com/segments/epa...
26.02.2026 18:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1Another outstanding post by @marcusmarcusrc.bsky.social. I especially liked his analogy of climbing a mountain when describing EPA's flimsy "margin of error" argument: just because your GPS doesn't show a change when you take one step up the mountain doesn't mean that the step isn't real or helpful.
21.02.2026 00:54 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I made one more post on Endangerment to address the week's news and the de minimis argument in more depth. Starting next week, I hope to begin posting on non-Endangerment subjects! thesaraphreport.substack.com/p/through-th...
20.02.2026 22:05 β π 6 π 2 π¬ 0 π 2
An excellent dive into the emails of the Climate Working Group by @sharonkelly.bsky.social and the @desmog.com team. For a group who thought highly of their own observational skills, they should have seen up front that they'd eventually be thrown under the EPA bus.
www.desmog.com/2026/02/13/t...
This administration's wholesale demolition of science reminds me of the line from the Chernobyl miniseries: "Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later, that debt is paid." We're building up an enormous debt to the truth. Paying that debt is (and will be) even more costly.
18.02.2026 14:53 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
You might find this document of interest - it's House of Representatives hearings about pollution control in general, but quite a few discussions of CO2 as a pollutant. 1966 (!)
www.govinfo.gov/app/details/...
GOP support for science has always been contingent on the topic. Perhaps they're less willing to throw out the entire field of science, but they've long been willing to severely limit parts of it (e.g. climate mitigation) when the findings became too uncomfortable for their patrons.
17.02.2026 15:43 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I also note that he used simplified climate models to generate EPA's estimates of how much the rule would affect temps and SLR, going in detail to explain that the simplified models were considered valid compared to the full versions. When it counts, Zeldin loves the consensus climate science.
15.02.2026 14:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks to the Trump administration, you can now just decide that you donβt know thingsβeven if you do know them, @petridishes.bsky.social writes:
15.02.2026 13:45 β π 127 π 40 π¬ 11 π 10I've never heard it before. I grew up in northern NM, which has lots of ties to TX and OK. I'd think that if it had been big in TX/OK, we'd have heard it in NM.
14.02.2026 17:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0All of this is spot-on, but @andrewdessler.com's final point is the most critical from a climate science perspective. The DOE report was their best shot against mainstream climate science. It failed miserably and publicly when put to the acid test of legal acceptability.
13.02.2026 21:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The repeal is not good, but their removal of the science from the legal document is nothing less than a win for science. Don't let them convince you otherwise - the reality is that they took their best shot at undermining the science and were forced to admit they couldn't do it.
13.02.2026 18:03 β π 29 π 5 π¬ 0 π 0In their final Endangerment Finding rule, EPA dropped their reliance on the DOE climate report "in light of concerns raised by some commenters." Despite their best effort, when it mattered most, EPA has effectively and officially conceded that the consensus climate science is correct. πΎβΌοΈ
13.02.2026 15:16 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Here's the link to the actual rule rescinding the Endangerment Finding and vehicle GHG standards, for all those interested:
www.epa.gov/regulations-...
It hasn't been posted to the Federal Register, so the actual rule won't be on EPA's website. Not likely to happen until tomorrow.
13.02.2026 02:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Another excellent essay by @vermontgmg.bsky.social about ICE/CBP, this one about their use (or abuse) of masks.
www.doomsdayscenario.co/p/ice-s-mask...
Yes - an excellent article. But they're not as close to "total victory" as they imagine.
10.02.2026 13:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Political appointees could *always* override the civil servants. It's just that the politicals hate being embarrassed when lowly civil servants show that the politicals' 'evidence' is fabricated, wrong, and contrary to law. No reason for this rule beyond the fear of being outed as frauds.
07.02.2026 23:17 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Great to see my former colleague Bryan Hubbell is wasting no time in contributing to important work at @rff.org with this excellent report on the Zeldin EPA's decision to ignore the monetized health benefits of reducing air pollution.
07.02.2026 16:39 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1Thrilled to see this paper, especially by someone with the stature of @gruberte.bsky.social. The inability to linearly reduce production to zero (or even close) is an issue that's been ignored by big energy system analyses and has enormous implications for energy and petro products more broadly.
06.02.2026 16:46 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0