LaserSharkDFB

That is not the religion of atheists, and no, we do not. Happy to help.

Insufficient. Plenty of people have faith, and for most of them it's not faith in Jesus. Was the question of whether or not he exists important, or not? If so, why withhold evidence? If not, why spread tales of Hell?

What?

Would I believe? Sure.

Would I embrace him? Hell no. He'd have a lot of explaining to do if he wanted acceptance, let alone respect, starting with why did it take dying before he could provide sufficient evidence?

When they say Somalian, they mean black.

When they say Haitian, they mean black.

They've learned that they can't go full racist anymore, so they're changing the language and targeting smaller groups.

Don't be fooled by the educated Klansman.

Prisons are for people convicted of crimes. What they want is a concentration camp.

This is exactly Putin's rhetoric to justify the war on Ukraine. "How dare you stand up to me!"

His standard "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" is so funny to me. It's incredibly out of place for the President to be using that phrase, like he's a middle manager shoving work at a subordinate. What a joke.

My God, we're doomed.

Oh, I get it, you're a moron.

Wait, narco-terrorism is actually a thing? I thought it was something Trump just made up to justify murdering fishermen. Drug dealers aren't terrorists, they're capitalists.

This sounds like a joke, but I talked to someone last month who said he didn't celebrate Thanksgiving.

I don't think the algorithm knows the difference between theistic and atheistic content. And there's pretty much no atheist ads, so it feeds you the closest thing to your interests.

I don't know that those two are theists. They're just assholes.

Too obnoxious to engage with, honestly. Fuck off.

Because you claimed it was true. What, we're supposed to be able to read your mind?

Again, let me know just as soon as you're ready to engage honestly, starting with admitting you were lying about that Dawkins quote.

We don't have a hard definition of magic, either, but we can point out when people aren't using it.

Colloquially, we can say a god is a powerful non-human entity. By that standard, no human is a god. Insisting on a literal standard of colloquial usage makes you a troll.

Nah.

Let me know when you're done trolling, though.

That's really funny.

Nothing has ever presented itself to me as a god. Your pedantry is boring and pointless.

Point of order: Marxists, or possibly Stalinists, are atheists. Communism itself does not require atheism.

It is your job to back up your claim that this quote was a matter of public record. Were you lying?

The fact that there is no solid definition for a god is good evidence that no God exists in any way that we can detect.

Do you have a link to where he said this? The closest I can find is him talking about every person in China owning a car, just to give an idea of scale. Either way, sounds like he was being hyperbolic, not literal.

Oh, brother.

First, we don't have a god, metaphorical or otherwise.

Second, if we had a god, Dawkins would absolutely not be it. He's a piece of shit that nobody likes because he's massively anti-trans.

Third, he's a biologist, not a geologist. If he actually said this, it's just his opinion.

I dunno, man. Every day I seem to feel just a little bit more radicalized.

We figured before the files were released that any significant redactions would be safely assumed to pertain to Trump. He's all over those files, and now everyone knows it.

"Don't go! The duck hates gay people!"