's Avatar

@simonloncaric.bsky.social

33 Followers  |  110 Following  |  13 Posts  |  Joined: 10.01.2025  |  2.2019

Latest posts by simonloncaric.bsky.social on Bluesky

"Sweden's parliament passed legislation on Wednesday to finance a new generation of nuclear reactors the government says are key to energy security and achieving net zero emissions by 2045."

https://archive.ph/y1uzR

25.05.2025 19:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

If I were the ruler of a country with coastlines on both Atlantic and Pacific (e.g. Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico) I'd have a railroad built that allows to double stack under wire to compete with the Panama Canal. ๐Ÿš† ๐Ÿšข ๐Ÿ“ฆ

26.05.2025 10:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The Iberian peninsula are testing what the near future might look like should Spain press ahead on phasing out nuclear ๐Ÿ˜‰

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/04/28/spain-portugal-and-parts-of-france-hit-by-massive-power-outage

28.04.2025 11:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 5    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Photo du jour

Tournant 1970-1980 : Tournage de lโ€™รฉbauche dโ€™un arbre BP (Basse Pression) dโ€™un groupe turboalternateur pour un rรฉacteur #nuclรฉaire de 900 MW dans les ateliers de lโ€™usine Alsthom de Belfort.

19.03.2025 08:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What kind of heat pump and what's the COP right now?

22.01.2025 08:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Thousands of people marching down the street in Almaraz Spain. A banner says โ€œSรญ a Almaraz, Al futuroโ€

Thousands of people marching down the street in Almaraz Spain. A banner says โ€œSรญ a Almaraz, Al futuroโ€

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Over 7,000 people march through the streets of Almaraz Spain to stop the closure of local nuclear plant

The government has mandated the plant close prematurely in 2027

Fantastic work by @guillemsanchis.bsky.social !

www.lasexta.com/noticias/soc...

19.01.2025 04:16 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 43    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Floor plan between EPR 1 and 2.

Floor plan between EPR 1 and 2.

The French audit office gives off a warning on the planned build of six EPR2s. Are we in for another financial catastrophe like with Olkiluoto-3, Flamanville-3 and Hinkley Point C?

No, but you'll probably see a lot of anti glee the coming days, so let's [โ€ฆ]

[Original post on greennuclear.online]

16.01.2025 11:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

I never said it was failing, i simply addressed your claim about price with a cherry picked example just as you did. Nuclear was cheap historically and is currently cheap in the East, because they know how to build.
Just for the heck of it here's some more:)
about.bnef.com/blog/soaring...

14.01.2025 13:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Failed offshore auction highlights how Denmark missed winds of change Denmark's failure to attract any bids in an offshore wind power tender this week stems from a rigid auction model, a failure to adapt to a changed economic reality for renewable energy projects and rising competition, analysts said on Friday.

Wind projects are also having trouble.

www.reuters.com/sustainabili...

14.01.2025 12:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

*socialist. And Yugoslavia was one of the founding members of the non-aligned movement so implying he had ties to the KGB because he was Yugoslav is unfounded at best and stupid at worst.

14.01.2025 05:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 12    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
two button meme: "good thing we have safety regs" on one side "let's get rid of safety regs" on the other. Bottom text "nuclear advocates looking at nuclear power's excellent safety record"

two button meme: "good thing we have safety regs" on one side "let's get rid of safety regs" on the other. Bottom text "nuclear advocates looking at nuclear power's excellent safety record"

Tough decision

12.01.2025 13:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 16    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A coffee addict

13.01.2025 05:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not sure I'm willing to only bet the future of climate on a group of technologies that haven't managed to decarbonise a single major grid.

12.01.2025 10:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Nuclear has a 4-9x higher energy production per unit of installed capacity and is dispatchable. So yes apples and oranges.
Will we not need clean power in 10, 20 and 30 years? Will we stop planting trees because they take decades to grow?
System costs are the thing that really matter.

10.01.2025 13:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Because your post is comparing apples and oranges.
We need all low carbon technologies for quick and robust decarbonisation.

10.01.2025 13:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agree, but I also wouldn't complain if we minimize mining.

10.01.2025 12:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

It's also one of the lowest, depending on which source you look at (some sources list wind as lower).

10.01.2025 12:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Can you post the source of this information? It's also note worthy that capacity does not equal production.

10.01.2025 11:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Nuclear actually has the lowest material intensity.

10.01.2025 11:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Did you know that installed capacity and energy production aren't the same?

10.01.2025 11:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@simonloncaric is following 19 prominent accounts