Thank you!!!
18.05.2025 19:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0@itssamg.bsky.social
A Canadian who doesnβt think Canada is broken and is ready to fight to make sure it stays that way. Iβm not the overly nice Canadian you were promised but I make up for it with dog content πΎ
Thank you!!!
18.05.2025 19:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0You thought you would try to correct my comment even though itβs bloody obvious people who donβt pay tax donβt get a tax reduction and now youβre irked that I am clarifying your incomplete information ? Iβm really starting to see why this platform has the reputation it does π₯΄
15.05.2025 15:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And to be more precise on your comment it isnβt only those living with disabilities and seniors. People who are single filers under 65 who make below the BPA for that year also do not pay federal income tax
15.05.2025 15:25 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I think itβs wisely understood that there would be no reduction on a rate of zero but if you want to be precise you could edit to say everyone with taxable income
15.05.2025 15:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0We need a Canadian Heritage moment that shows society where there are no services that are currently funded by tax
15.05.2025 09:56 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You will pay 14% tax on taxable income up to $57,375 instead of 15%. So whatever that works out to based on your income situation
15.05.2025 09:55 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They are divesting from Israel not Israelis . The answer to what has Israel done is βcommit war crimes to carry out a genocideβ
15.05.2025 00:15 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0To clarify for those who are unsure, everyone who earns taxable income is eligible for the Liberal tax cut. The 1% reduction applies to tax owing on up to $57,375 . Anything earned above that is taxed at the rate in the next bracket (as usual) but your rate is still reduced for tax on $57,375
15.05.2025 00:08 β π 42 π 2 π¬ 3 π 0It technically applies to everyone because itβs a 1% reduction on federal tax on earned income up to $57,375. (Income above that gets taxed at the rate in the next bracket (unchanged with this cut) but the person would qualify on the reduction of tax for the first amount)
14.05.2025 23:55 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Mostly just looking for further proof of their hypocrisy
14.05.2025 23:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Headline from CTV: Carney signs order to prioritize middle-class tax cut, after first meeting with new cabinet Spencer Van Dyk Writer & Producer, Ottawa News Bureau, CTV News
What are the odds that Team Axe the Tax votes no on this ?
14.05.2025 21:13 β π 48 π 3 π¬ 6 π 0The yugest scores
14.05.2025 21:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I listened and was nodding my head and then she dropped that part and I cackled
14.05.2025 20:58 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I just saw a video where a women said she thinks there should be a knowledge test for people to vote and then went on to imply that if they did that conservatives would have won and Iβll be sure to let you all know when I stop laughing about that
14.05.2025 19:21 β π 311 π 28 π¬ 17 π 4Is not one particular person/comment . In the lead up to the leadership race, election and since there were many post that read like Carney is infallible , Canadaβs saviour , perfect. It makes me uneasy bc seeing someone as these things often means you wonβt be critical or will give them passes etc
08.05.2025 19:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I totally get that people want stability but we donβt have it. Trump is still a huge issue and the time between now and the next election is short given what we have to accomplish to ensure we donβt have Poilievre in office in the next few years
08.05.2025 16:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I mean you refuse to hear about the people who refused to hear so I think my point has been proven. Have a nice day, John
08.05.2025 15:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I donβt agree- A lot of people refused to hear anything remotely critical of the Trudeau Liberals
I agree that the latter is a serious problem but there is a big difference between scrutiny and a smear campaign. Some seem to think that these are the same if directed at their leader of choice
Not only do we have a right to criticize our governments - we have an obligation to.
Blind hero worship of ANY political party, ANY elected official is irrational & dangerous.
NO party, NO politician, is above reproach.
It makes us stronger when we stop excusing bad policy & hold them accountable.
Thatβs the thing, when you worship a politician, youβll never criticize their awful policies, even when you are adversely affected.
26.02.2025 13:01 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0If I donβt see it it canβt be happening is quite a childish worldview
08.05.2025 13:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Youβd think seeing all the shit going on downstairsβ¦weβd be more cautious?
While I am complimentary and hopefully optimistic that PM Carney will steer us in the right direction & I stand by my choice for him as my PMβ¦
He still has work to do and the βcan do no wrongβ attitude is dangerous.
I donβt care if sharing my opinion and observations is alienating me. Iβd rather be honest than popular.
And agreeing that itβs happening but calling me a troll for acknowledging it is kinda dumb
The point is that people are speaking about him like heβs infallible and that is problematic.
I didnβt paint anyone specifically; if people are taking something that doesnβt apply to them personally thatβs not for me to control
If a cartoon avi , all lower case weirdo didnβt think I was a dick Iβd be worried. Toodaloo
08.05.2025 12:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No one said you canβt .
Again, if it doesnβt apply to you itβs not about you.
This isnβt about people being relieved. Im sorry I disrupted the echo chamber by saying something people donβt like and expecting them to , oh I dunno, manage their own feelings about why it feels personal
08.05.2025 11:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Indeed, the answer to a populist right isnβt an unchecked left. Itβs going to be very interesting to see both how MC as a non-career politician will govern outside of current crisis management, as well as how media covers him in that role.
08.05.2025 11:41 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0*shouldnβt treat them like they are infallible
08.05.2025 11:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0That was a typo. It definitely should have said we shouldnβt treat them that way
08.05.2025 11:50 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0