Binky Warhol

Went to my first men’s match of the season last night (am a women’s season ticket holder, but only returned to London last year so on the long list)
After we went 2-0 up about 1/5 of the clock end left, and by 90 mins it was 1/3.
Disappointing

@amylawrence.bsky.social re fans leaving early. The 8:00 kick off does mean that certain trains from Waterloo / Euston just don’t run, so if you miss them you miss them.
However a lot of season ticket holders don’t go to the group games and put them on the ticket exchange. It is odd

@amylawrence.bsky.social the women’s matches now they allow drinking has made people leaving worse. There is a guy who every home match this season has got up 5 mins into the second half and got extra drinks. Making a whole row stand up

@tayo3000.bsky.social thank goodness you were the voice of reason on the pod. If we beat them at home it cancels it out.
Eze was never going to start due to the system and Martinelli helped with Salah.

Congratulations on the unisex toilets in your house. No one has ever said this before. Three cheers for you.

You do you, but if you’re an employer and you don’t provide proper facilities you are breaking the law.
You are very dull.

EA 2010 was clarified last week and the Supreme Court was clear. If you provide single sex toilets (not unisex) then these are for sex not gender.
Also baby changing facilities are available in men’s toilets, this is just a canard. I know because I needed to use them and never had to use a ladies

What a load of tosh.

That tells you more about them. Kier Starmer is intrinsically untrustworthy because he stands for nothing.
That doesn’t mean that a KC should just encourage people to break the law

Nope, toilets with sex on the outside (not gender different thing), has been clarified as the law. Men in the men’s however they identify.

So you no longer believe in the rule of law and making your case politically?

Aha thank you, I did think I’d heard the name.

Oh an antisemite has entered the chat.

Of course you are, why wouldn’t you be?

Keep killing children and telling yourself it’s for freedom mate.

Yep, you do know our farmers can have them and don’t manage to kill random civilians.
Whereas you lot think an amendment regarding militia is a licence to kill children monthly.

Yep.

This. Lots of self righteous pricks on here with a massive echo chamber. It’s why I avoided Twitter from 2013 until Covid.

I’m on it.
I’m also sure I recognise the inspectors name so I must have heard a drama.
Thank you

Yeah, because US knife crime isn’t statistically higher than the UK and you lot can’t own guns without killing school kids once a month.

I went through my library the other day and realised I have at least 300 unread.
Mainly non fiction which I like the idea of but often don’t actually enjoy.
I’ve never read her, I presume she’s good, so any pointers for a starter?

No Kindle books for over 2 days would probably kill me.

Maybe start with the premise of not claiming you haven’t said something you have and then claiming it’s nationalists being mean to you.

It’s not a gotcha to point out that Otto said something he first denied and now calls a joke.
I don’t care what he said because he has less knowledge of history than my cat. Otto needs to own it rather than pretend it never happened.

All the white knights rushing to Otto’s defence is somewhat ironic.
Yeah Maguire is another knob who wangs on about St George’s day too much.
He didn’t write an ahistorical book and claim it was history though.

You keep defending him, I’m sure he appreciates it.
He brought it up and denied he ever said it, I’m pointing out his hypocrisy nothing more.

Not sure I said he was. Still you keep defending St Otto.

Cappadocia - not Turkey as it didn’t exist.
He wouldn’t have called himself Turkish and would undoubtedly have spoken Greek.
Keep going with those emoticons churl.

Ooh the ahistorical meme full of inaccuracies- tell me more please.
Enjoy Otto day

Not really, Cappadocia is now Turkey but he wasn’t Turkish because it didn’t exist.
Otto is pretending he didn’t say something banal and now blames the mysterious ‘right wing’ forces each year for reminding him.
This is the man that put to print his assumption that Khan was a name not a title.

It was a picture of a bloke in a crusaders outfit