It’s a bit too coarse for 11 year olds, but put “Shoresy” in your queue for later.
18.10.2025 18:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@nanoscaleviews.bsky.social
Physicist, occasional wiseass. Feed for Nanoscale Views (http://nanoscale.blogspot.com). Nanoscale@sciencemastodon.com. He/his. These opinions are my own, obviously, and don’t represent my employer. (Annoyed that I feel like I have to say that.)
It’s a bit too coarse for 11 year olds, but put “Shoresy” in your queue for later.
18.10.2025 18:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧪⚛️ There are a couple of fun, conversational preprints this week on the arXiv - one about the mysterious connection between structural chirality and electron spin; and a condensed matter theory take on ways to think about quantum gravity. nanoscale.blogspot.com/2025/10/inte...
18.10.2025 13:44 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0I have to know - what journal is this?
18.10.2025 02:22 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time….
18.10.2025 01:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree that it feels similar, but the adoption of AI tools already by a huge fraction of students may make this different. MOOCs always had limited buy-in, but the temptation tools use AI is very widespread.
17.10.2025 12:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I'm not asking a LLM to be a search engine; I'm asking why an image generator cannot make good images of something that surely appears many thousands of times in its training set.
15.10.2025 21:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0ELI5 why this (benzene case) is different than: generative model is trained on thousands of cat pix, so it's reasonable for me to expect it not to create an image of a walrus when I ask it to make an image of a cat.
15.10.2025 21:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It surprises me how poorly generative AI is at chemical structures. Google image search for "benzene" finds thousands of correct structures. Why does its generative image AI tool fail to create something that matches that training set?
15.10.2025 20:35 — 👍 9 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 2The question was rhetorical, btw. I'm sure at it's root this is about advertising revenue from the school/college-age demographic.
15.10.2025 13:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Google ad for using google lens to do your homework for you
🧪⚛️ This morning when I tried to search for a scientific result on my browser, it popped up this image. While it asks if I want "help" on my homework, it says paste in the problem and it (presumably google gemini) will just solve it for me. Google, why are you explicitly encouraging this??
15.10.2025 13:12 — 👍 18 🔁 4 💬 3 📌 0If the speaker of the house can indefinitely refuse to swear in duly elected members, then we don’t have representative government anymore.
15.10.2025 03:39 — 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0No, no, this time for sure we have entered an entirely new regime of equity valuation, so old notions of reasonable PE are no longer valid. Surely this time, unlike every past time someone says this.
13.10.2025 18:59 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Dilution refrigerator cold leak 🧪⚛️
12.10.2025 13:41 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0We’re both professors, and you know that describes about 75% of our colleagues….
11.10.2025 22:48 — 👍 16 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0How worrisome is his internal polling if he’s spending this much money 5 months before the primary!
11.10.2025 20:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Good to see John standing up for science
youtube.com/watch?v=7Vcm...
🧪⚛️ In case you’re interested, the ACS webinar from National Nanotechnology Day is available free here: www.acs.org/acs-webinars...
11.10.2025 01:01 — 👍 9 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 0MIT to administration: No. Glad to see explicit refusal, rather than weasel words implying negotiations. orgchart.mit.edu/letters/rega...
10.10.2025 17:32 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sure, but it would be different for certain. We don’t have an habilitation for example.
09.10.2025 19:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧪⚛️ The proposal by the administration to restrict F1 student visas to four years and get rid of occupational practical training could devastate international doctoral studies in the US. PhDs almost always take 5-6 years. The claim that extensions for good students won't be an issue is...dubious.
09.10.2025 19:07 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0🧪⚛️ The Rice Advanced Materials Institute 2026 postdoctoral fellowship competition is ramping up, and I'd be happy to talk about opportunities in my group. To get started, I'd need a CV. See here for details of this highly competitive opportunity: rami.rice.edu/rami-postdoc...
09.10.2025 13:33 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hey @jaketapper.bsky.social , do you have any concerns about the mental wellbeing of the president, and whether his advisers are feeding him wildly inaccurate information? Please look at this now, not in retrospect in a future book deal!
08.10.2025 21:40 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think "macroscopic" in this context means that the system doing the tunneling involves very large numbers of particles (what is effectively tunneling in this problem is the phase difference btw the superconducting states on opposite sides of the junction). Try doi.org/10.1016/0003...
08.10.2025 13:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧪⚛️ The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics - a brief writeup about what is meant here by macroscopic quantum tunneling. nanoscale.blogspot.com/2025/10/2025...
07.10.2025 16:24 — 👍 18 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0🧪⚛️ Now with blog link goodness: ACS Webinar about plasmonics and "Illuminating the Nano Frontier" this coming Thursday. nanoscale.blogspot.com/2025/10/acs-...
05.10.2025 19:18 — 👍 9 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0Structural color = nanoscience all around you, all the time.
05.10.2025 15:19 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Lots of capital, too many people who all think they're the smartest one in the room, and complete credulity when faced with hype are three contributors.
04.10.2025 19:53 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧪⚛️ This coming Thursday October 9 I will be giving a talk as part of the @acs.org American Chemical Society's Nanotechnology Day events. All are welcome! www.acs.org/acs-webinars...
03.10.2025 19:51 — 👍 12 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0