Personally, for diverging maps I like dark-mode ones like Berlin from @fabiocrameri.ch (again, because I'm used to blue = negative, red = positive from jet).
And for sequential I like viridis and inferno because I'm pretty basic ๐
@tomrhysmarshall.bsky.social
Computational cognitive neuroscientist. Assistant Professor, Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, UK. Views my own. ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
Personally, for diverging maps I like dark-mode ones like Berlin from @fabiocrameri.ch (again, because I'm used to blue = negative, red = positive from jet).
And for sequential I like viridis and inferno because I'm pretty basic ๐
I suspect many people like jet, mainly because it's familiar.
And there's nothing wrong with that. Aesthetics are subjective ๐
Imo that's why turbo is great; it doesn't require a huge shift in thinking if you're used to jet ๐๐๐
Addendum: turbo in matlab - uk.mathworks.com/help/matlab/...
24.10.2025 13:15 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Please repost for visibility and also add more resources to this list! Thanks ๐
24.10.2025 11:37 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 04) @fabiocrameri.ch created some awesome perceptually uniform, variant-colour-vision-friendly maps.
My favourite feature of these: The *circular* ones are really good for plotting things like oscillatory phase ๐๐๐
www.fabiocrameri.ch/colourmaps/
3) Really in love with the jet aesthetic? No fear! Folks at Google created a 'more jet than jet' colormap that solves many of the problems of the original.
research.google/blog/turbo-a...
2) Using MATLAB? Steal the ones from python/matplotlib (part 2)
cbrewer has nice diverging colormaps like blue-to-white-to-red or blue-to-yellow-to-red if you want to keep that aspect of jet.
www.mathworks.com/matlabcentra...
1) Using MATLAB? Steal the ones from python/matplotlib (part 1)
These sequential colormaps are perceptually uniform and I think they're pretty.
www.mathworks.com/matlabcentra...
Doing a lit search and finding many recent papers still using the jet colormap ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
Please don't use this colormap for anything because it's not perceptually uniform (changes of equal size don't look equal) and not friendly to people with variant colour vision.
Some alternatives below... <thread>
Fully funded PhD position via imprs-is
A mobile EEG/EyeTracking setup
EEG system photographed with backlight and glowing electrodes
S-CCS Lab PhD Position
3+2 year 100% TVL-13 position in '26 - open topic on the intersection of combined EEG-EyeTracking, Statistical Methods, Cognitive Modelling, VR/Mobile EEG, Vision ...
Apply via Max-Planck IMPRS-IS program until 2025-11-16 imprs.is.mpg.de
Read: www.s-ccs.de/philosophy
"<student> has asked you to provide a reference...
โ
...click this easy link right here in the email and we'll take you right to the place where you can write it."
โ...here is a two part reference ID. Go to this website, then tediously copy the two parts of the reference ID without error, then..."
One... percent...
One percent.
One... per... cent...
Looks like a great opportunity for someone with a background in brain stimulation.
The Maastricht brainstim gang are very kind and collaborative and Maastricht is a lovely city๐
Academia needs more co-operation internally, and needs to fight mistrust being sown against it externally. So little things like this are important.
Curious what the rest of you think. Have I missed anything? 4/4 end
b)
The first framing makes receiving the award feel like an *end point*. 'We worked hard for years and now we've got this. Hurrah.'
The second framing emphasises that the award is a *beginning*. 'We've been given a chance to do something important. We'll do our best. You can count on us.' 3/4
a)
The first framing centers the *competition*. 'We're the winners because we got the money. You lose.' It's zero-sum thinking.
The second framing centers the *outputs* of research. 'When the funding is done, the whole world will have this thing. Everybody wins.' Non-zero-sum 2/4
Two framings
1: We're proud of <researcher> for getting <grant> because it's prestigious and really hard to get.
2: We're proud of <researcher> for getting <grant> because it enables them to do research that's really important.
I see versions of 1 a lot but think 2 is MUCH better.
Here's why 1/4
Fascinating!
23.10.2025 10:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yep ๐
It turns out that a lot of Matlab users didn't know it either... ๐
Even worse, don't rely on default-on-initialisation values for your random seed ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฑ
I did some drama about this on the birdsite once: blogs.mathworks.com/matlab/2022/...
Nice job @dotproduct.bsky.social and Peter! ๐ช
22.10.2025 10:41 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Really looking forward to reading this from @eelkespaak.bsky.social
I love this kind of fundamental-assumptions-about-what-the-brain-is-doing stuff.
Is the the neuroimaging community (broadly conceived) submitting to ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ถ๐บ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ again?????
Not to be publication police but the shift had seemed major 1-2 years ago.
Looking at the editorial board it seems to have serious scientists once more.
Curious about thoughts of the community.
Ever wondered about the variety and depth of neuroscience research at the University of Birmingham (if not, why not?)? Seek no further: www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/pro...
@thechbh.bsky.social @uob-sop.bsky.social @imh-uob.bsky.social
I get the main point and agree. Just have a quick question about 'r~-0.7'.
Are you saying r~-0.7 because that would mean r^2~0.49 i.e. about half the variance explained?
Black and white image of the first degree day for women, 14th October 1920.
#OnThisDay in 1920, the first women received their Oxford degrees ๐
๐ท | St Anne's College Oxford
High praise. I appreciate it โค๏ธ
13.10.2025 13:38 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Goed bezig @stanvanpelt.bsky.social!
Definitely picking this up next time I pass through NL.
Help out with a survey of TMS research practices!
10.10.2025 14:32 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The Sleep Network is up and running at the University of Birmingham, looking forward to talking to more people about sleep and circadian rhythms
10.10.2025 11:06 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0