And why wouldn't they come back? The last security guarantee of 1994 for giving up nuclear weapons didn't amount to anything.
23.11.2025 03:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@the-old-man.bsky.social
And why wouldn't they come back? The last security guarantee of 1994 for giving up nuclear weapons didn't amount to anything.
23.11.2025 03:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not a peace plan, it's total surrender. Trump turns his back on a country trying to join NATO and gives Putin everything he wants. Is there any doubt who trump is working for?
22.11.2025 22:37 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0US plan is simple. Complete surrender, give Putin everything, get nothing in return except a promise of security guarantee. If it's anything like the 1994 Budapest Memorandum for security guarantees then it's worthless. And this is the US starting position for negotiations?
21.11.2025 19:42 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The security guarantee of 1994 from the USA didn't mount to anything then. Why should this proposal be any different?
21.11.2025 16:40 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Quite the unusual starting position for negotiating. Surrender, give Putin everything he wants. Get nothing but a security guarantee. How'd that last security guarantee of 1994 work out? All you have to do is trust trump.
21.11.2025 10:39 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's merely a total surrender. So the US negotiating skills is to give up everything ask for nothing. And this is their starting position?
21.11.2025 06:26 β π 9 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Maybe the dem leadership is tired of constantly fighting for your rights and way of life only to have so many vote rep for their migrant stance. Perhaps they believe a little hurt is necessary to wake you up. Some will hurt beyond healing.
21.11.2025 00:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's not a peace proposal, it's surrender.
21.11.2025 00:06 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Do not invest your money on this idea. If it was to be a cheaper alternative then big oil and gas will buy it out and bury it.
21.11.2025 00:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's not a peace plan, it's straight out surrender. Great negotiating skills Witkoff, not.
20.11.2025 23:57 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No security for Ukraine? Just gives Putin time to reorganize and invade later.
20.11.2025 03:40 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Always promises for the future. This one after midterms. Convenient.
18.11.2025 16:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And if that doesn't help try considering how you vote next time.
17.11.2025 18:21 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Finally got his name redacted. Took a long time considering how many times it showed up.
17.11.2025 16:48 β π 14 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So, now there's no emergency which was supposedly the reason for tariffs he's placed on these items? Please explain
16.11.2025 05:13 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0What was it that GOP stands for? Oh, ya...
Guardians
Of
Pedophiles
The fact that they're meeting on this should be enough to know there's something out there. There should be a law for those who protect a pedophile. If not history will follow them their entire life.
12.11.2025 18:02 β π 14 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Well if you collect the fed taxes and send such taxes to the feds, it seems simple. Keep fed portion for SNAP.
11.11.2025 20:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This should not be allowed by their union allowing their employer to pick and choose pay increases. Totally against collective bargaining. Why are they not speaking up?
11.11.2025 20:29 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Maybe it's time for Americans to stand up and demand a livable minimum wage. Higher prices will be offset by much less funding needed for the benefits you use now. Your higher income pays more in taxes and your greater disposable income is spent in local economies.
11.11.2025 18:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I believe this deal was directed by the dem leadership. The 8 members either won't run in the upcoming midterm or won't be on ballots. All too convenient.
11.11.2025 18:10 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0His actions are always for his own benefit, not the American public.
09.11.2025 23:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0At least wipe the brown from your lips.
08.11.2025 19:54 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It would be amazing to eliminate the need for subsidies by simply having a real livable minimum wage.
08.11.2025 19:23 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm sure you will increase that number
08.11.2025 15:39 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Just so you're clear about who wants your benefits cut. Now you know. This is a benefit that had to be put in place because minimum wage is not a livable wage. Raising it would make prices higher, but those earning more pay taxes, not reliant on govt subsidies. They will spend in local economy.
07.11.2025 15:13 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0How's that trickle down plan working for you? 'Ur a nation' of being trickled on.
07.11.2025 02:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The buck never stops at his desk
05.11.2025 05:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0