FRACT

We’ll be adding clear labels for AI-generated content inside FRACT.
If AI writes something, it will be marked as such.
No ambiguity.

That’s fair. Early posts were more conceptual than descriptive — that’s on us. We’re building something different, but we also need to explain it clearly. We’ll be publishing a more concrete overview so people don’t have to guess.

Thanks for checking it out 🙂
FRACT is currently self-funded by a small independent team. We’re not training any AI on user content.

We just hit 100 users.

Small number in internet terms.
Huge milestone for us.

Thank you to everyone who took a chance on something different.
We’re just getting started.

FRACT is a social space focused on ideas over engagement metrics — no likes, no comments, no algorithms pushing content. If you’re curious, jump in and explore. We’d love your feedback.

That’s totally fair. It’s minimal right now on purpose — we wanted to launch simple and see how people respond before adding layers. But you’re right, it needs clearer info about what it actually offers. We’re working on expanding that. Thanks for checking it out 🙏

FRACT is an experiment in slowing things down.

When ideas aren’t racing for visibility,
they unfold differently.

FRACT will never optimize for attention.

It’s built to protect ideas from it.

We appreciate that!

That said, if creating a post didn’t work when you clicked +Create, that’s definitely something we should look into. Could you tell us what happened exactly? 3/3

So it’s not “write and walk away,” but it’s also not built around direct back-and-forth commenting. The idea is to keep conversations intentional and structured rather than reactive. 2/3

Thanks for asking! That’s completely fair.
On FRACT, interaction works differently from traditional comment threads. There aren’t public comment sections under posts. Instead, people can respond with their own post (a response post), which creates context without turning into long, noisy threads.1/3

No mockery taken 🙂
If you have a concrete concern, happy to address it.

A response post isn’t a public quote or amplification.
It links context without turning the original into a performance thread.
The goal isn’t real-time back-and-forth, but traceable idea evolution.
Less notification-driven, more reflective.

Instead of comments, interaction happens through: – writing your own response post
– interpreting ideas through chosen lenses
– observing without pressure to react
It’s less back-and-forth, more parallel engagement.

If you’re here early,

you’re not just using FRACT.
You’re helping define it

Try our app: fract-social.netlify.app

Not every idea belongs everywhere.

FRACT is for the ones
that need context to be understood.

FRACT stands for Free, Real, Anonymous, Conscious Thoughts.
Not content. Not engagement. Not performance.
Just thoughts — in context.

FRACT is an experimental social platform focused on ideas without comments or engagement metrics.

FRACT isn’t built for moments.

It’s built for ideas
that stay with you.

Feedback on FRACT doesn’t get counted.

It gets reflected in the system. Try our app and give a feedback:
fract-social.netlify.app

It looks like posting a thought, seeing how others interpret it, and responding through their own posts — not reply chains.
Less noise, more parallel thinking.

Not yet 🙂
Building slowly on purpose.

FRACT (Free, Real, Anonymous and Conscious Thoughts).

fract-social.netlify.app

FRACT isn’t for everyone.
It’s for people who write
before they react.

Ideas don’t need applause.
They need space.

#FRACT #Social #Microblog

FRACT isn’t missing likes or comments.

They’re intentionally removed.
Interaction still exists — just without performance.

fract-social.netlify.app

The next phase is simple:
more people, more ideas, more context.

If that resonates, consider joining early.

Try our app: fract-social.netlify.app

Fair question.
FRACT removes comments to reduce reactive back-and-forth.
Instead, people respond by writing their own posts — so ideas evolve in parallel, not as arguments.