ACT went first and fastest to 100 per cent renewables: It now looks like the smartest policy of all
reneweconomy.com.au/act-went-fir...
@michaelmazengarb.bsky.social
Renewable Energy and Climate Change policy | Climate law. Writes at Tempests and Terawatts tempestsandterawatts.com
ACT went first and fastest to 100 per cent renewables: It now looks like the smartest policy of all
reneweconomy.com.au/act-went-fir...
Itβs just magic pudding fossil fuel projects, whereby no project ever causes climate change.
07.10.2025 08:19 β π 13 π 6 π¬ 0 π 0Thank you!
07.10.2025 01:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm keen to chat to people in Australia working on climate attribution science and economics. Particularly, the quantification of climate losses and linking to specific sources of emissions.
Can anyone point me in the direction of anyone doing this work in Australia?
'No, this massive fossil fuel project won't have a significant impact on the environment, because if it wasn't built, gas will just come from somewhere else' is just wildly flawed logic.
07.10.2025 00:58 β π 17 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0The 'statement of reasons' given by enviro minister Murray Watt approving the North West Shelf gas project extension contains some astonishing mental gymnastics.
He assumes the same level of emissions could occur even if the project didn't proceed
epbcpublicportal.environment.gov.au/_entity/shar...
I can guarantee you this was not the first time, nor the last time, government data has been fed into ChatGPT.
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10...
One Battle After Another is an excellent movie and it is wild that it was filmed in the first half of 2024.
05.10.2025 01:04 β π 4 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Robbins Island wind farm is one project, that doesnβt need to be built where it is.
But, Australia is a big country with plenty of places to build wind and solar without compromising high value biodiversity sites.
Sure, but there were some unforced errors about the Robbins Island wind farm issues.
04.10.2025 22:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is not Larissa Watersβ best interview. #Insiders
04.10.2025 22:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Would be nice to live in a timeline where it was possible to state that there was zero possibility for Donald Trump and Nigel Farage to be the leaders of their respective countries in 2029.
Because itβs certainly not this one.
Dude complains about the cost of milk at a CVS in Manhattan, and then claims NYC has lost its touch compared to Sydney.
Also, Sydneyβs trains might be new and shiny, but at least the NY subway keeps running when it rainsβ¦
www.smh.com.au/national/i-m...
I donβt think thatβs a metaphor. Itβs hard to think of more literal diplomatic isolation.
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/w...
Just an absolute peak Canberra day today.
25.09.2025 06:22 β π 15 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0It's only a 30 minute walk from the UN to Madam Tussauds...
24.09.2025 07:08 β π 17 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0jfk, these people... www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...
23.09.2025 11:08 β π 12 π 2 π¬ 2 π 2lmao
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
The disturbing thing about the collapse of American democracy is how quickly some companies and institutions like Universities have fallen over themselves to facilitate it.
Preemptive obedience is just a shortcut to authoritarianism, not a way to avoid it.
The new emissions target, when framed as an additional reduction of 19 to 27 per cent between 2030 and 2035 is laughably vague.
The range is so wide, it renders it a bit meaningless for giving a policy or investment signal (other than the minimum needed to meet the bottom end of the target).
βThe best available science was and is clear. To prevent the worst and most dangerous impacts of climate change, it was and is imperative for every country to take steps to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions so as to ensure that the increase in the global average temperature is held to well below 2Β°C above pre-industrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to l.5Β°C above pre-industrial levels. Those critical objectives were enshrined in the Paris Agreement, to which Australia is a party. The evidence in this case indicated that the emissions reduction targets set by the Commonwealth in 2015, 2020 and 2021 were plainly not consistent with those objectives or its international obligations under the Paris Agreement.β
Just a reminder that the federal court recently found the Australian government has a track record of failing to set emissions reduction targets consistent with the best available science.
17.09.2025 20:32 β π 10 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0So the report (which Bowen didnβt write) is βout of the playbookβ ofβ¦ conservative political leaders? Like John Howard and Scott Morrison?
15.09.2025 23:08 β π 5 π 3 π¬ 1 π 1Especially when they were happy to announce approval for a massive fossil fuel development in the intervening days:
www.afr.com/politics/fed...
In the context of apparent delays and a withholding of the report from the public, it further suggests the government wasnβt prioritising its speedy publication.
www.afr.com/policy/energ...
News Corp machine in overdrive, trying to diminish the National Climate Risk Assessment
15.09.2025 06:59 β π 105 π 49 π¬ 9 π 6Just a little observation that the metadata on the website for the National Climate Risk Assessment shows the report was uploaded on Thursday last week, but effectively withheld from public visibility until today.
15.09.2025 06:42 β π 19 π 7 π¬ 3 π 5It also received advice from the Climate Change Authority on what the 2035 target should be on the same day.
15.09.2025 06:18 β π 13 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Worth noting the Albanese government had the National Climate Risk Assessment available to it, before it signed off on the expansion of the North West Shelf gas project extension.
15.09.2025 06:17 β π 45 π 23 π¬ 2 π 3