Secher's Avatar

Secher

@secher.bsky.social

Husband, father, IT guy, geek, agnostic atheist, Eco-Libertarian, cis-het white male who recognizes the privliege and violence inherent in my existence RIP Jon Postel No warfare but class warfare. John Brown did nothing wrong Deny. Defend. Depose

144 Followers  |  170 Following  |  393 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024  |  1.9767

Latest posts by secher.bsky.social on Bluesky

bsky.app/profile/katm...

31.03.2025 22:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Strongly regional, sometimes even as isolated as specific neighborhoods.

31.03.2025 22:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hmmโ€ฆ are you removing out conscious from the universe? I mean to say, isnโ€™t everything defined and limited to the laws of physics, quantum, Newtonian, or otherwise?

20.03.2025 21:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I am not saying that ChatGPT or the current generation of LLMs is conscious. I am simply taking the position that when we can no longer tell if something is conscious or not, should we not then consider that thing as being conscious?

19.03.2025 00:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Protective, comfy, and basically necessary?

18.03.2025 15:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Agreed, particularly on a social media platform limited to a few hundred characters, to be sure. But it is a good thing to ponder, I think.

18.03.2025 15:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Also, the idea simply made me think. There is prolly a shit ton of confirmation bias with that study, and I would love to see the criteria and someone else confirm the findings, but the idea is novel.

18.03.2025 15:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I was speaking in the much more expansive sense. Do you think our consciousness derives from some transcendental place, or is it a function of the laws of nature, chemistry, biology, etc? If the latter, then can you define, purely subjectively, obv, when you think something is conscious?

18.03.2025 15:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The only organization that has merited my membership renewal every year.

18.03.2025 14:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image 17.03.2025 22:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7698    ๐Ÿ” 2830    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 335    ๐Ÿ“Œ 132

Why so aggressive?

18.03.2025 14:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I am literally sitting in the woods right now.

18.03.2025 14:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Are we so filled with hubris that we believe only our reality gets to define consciousness and life? Is it possible for an AI, then, to ever deserve rights or consideration as a conscious entity?

18.03.2025 14:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

respond like they experience emotion and empathy. Are those people not conscious or fully human? If an LLM can mimic human emotion and empathy, is it not possible to argue that it has the some level of consciousness?

18.03.2025 14:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I don't understand. If our consciousness is a function of the laws of physics and some quantum randomness, why would we deny the possibility that an AI like GPT is not exhibiting some form of consciousness? People with severe emotional challenges often lack full empathy, but they can learn to

18.03.2025 14:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But why? Understanding that GPT does not yet have autonomy and 'consciousness', why, of something appears to be conscious, has the aspects of empathy, could we not consider it conscious? Are you implying that AI will never have true consciousness? Or is it a case of 'not yet'?

18.03.2025 13:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But why? Understanding that GPT does not yet have autonomy and 'consciousness', why, of something appears to be conscious, has the aspects of empathy, could we not consider it conscious? Are you implying that AI will never have true consciousness? Or is it a case of 'not yet'?

18.03.2025 13:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€˜Aight. Iโ€™ve done my Joplin working music list, Iโ€™ve done delta blues; now what?

08.03.2025 20:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Homemade 8โ€ base moulding, Janis Joplin, and big windows in a cold sunny afternoon. There are worse ways to spend an afternoon.

08.03.2025 17:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

For the old timers out there; the last of my stash:

08.03.2025 17:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sunlight = Best Disinfectant

04.02.2025 18:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It is great to hurt everyone else, but donโ€™t hurt me!
There is a parallel in there somewhereโ€ฆ

17.02.2025 20:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

what happens if I choose to delay them by a brief period of time, say 90 or 120 days? What are the consequences if I purchase a mutual fund for that 120 days, or just leave them in the bank for that 120 days? Sure, most of them are paid already, but every year there are a few thousand dollars.....

17.02.2025 14:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Laws are written upon paper, with ink. They cannot do anything more than a firearm is able to pick itself up and fire a round. It is the consequences of applying the potential that are of concern. Since my taxes are no longer going to the programs I support at all...

17.02.2025 14:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The question becomes then, how do we frame the conversation to show those people that politics do matter, directly, in every way impacting their lives. Bernie showed us, but he was cast aside by the DNC. How do WE bring this conversation to them?

17.02.2025 13:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It wasn't that more votes went to the felon, it is that many fewer people voted for Harris.
2020: Biden 81M felon 74M
2024: Harris: 74M felon 76M
While the felon did get 2M more, that is inconsequential to the drop in votes for Harris, 8M less than Biden.

17.02.2025 13:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 14    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Wait, like Huey Newton and the news? Nice!

17.02.2025 13:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

โ€˜You must obey the law!โ€™
No.
All ruling bodies are utterly dependent on the submission and complicity of their populace, from North Korea to Norway. Stop paying taxes on time, reshelve things in the wrong place, stay below the speed limit, use cash everywhere, any rule you can break, do so.

17.02.2025 12:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

REPOST if you support our federal workforce and know how dedicated they are to their jobs. Show them you appreciate them!

14.02.2025 01:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 35410    ๐Ÿ” 21230    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 593    ๐Ÿ“Œ 685
Post image Post image

The top health care companies in America spent 95% of their profits to make their CEOs & stockholders obscenely rich.

How many Americans would be alive today if those companies spent $2.6 trillion on disease prevention and primary care, instead of stock buybacks and dividends?

12.02.2025 19:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8235    ๐Ÿ” 2357    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 247    ๐Ÿ“Œ 124

@secher is following 19 prominent accounts