Matthew Shadle's Avatar

Matthew Shadle

@matthewshadle.bsky.social

Theologian, ethicist, higher ed administrator. USCCB Representative to National Council of Churches Faith and Order Convening Tables. Interrupting Capitalism (2018). The Origins of War (2011).

1,119 Followers  |  769 Following  |  1,811 Posts  |  Joined: 21.09.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Matthew Shadle (@matthewshadle.bsky.social)

They rename him the Secretary of WAR and now he's like "No, no, what we're doing isn't WAR it's something else!"

03.03.2026 02:06 β€” πŸ‘ 184    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 4

One reason this is so absurd is that, taken seriously, this would *also*
mean that Iran was justified in striking US targets because they could reasonably anticipate that the US would attack *them*.

03.03.2026 00:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So… Arroz con carne molida.

02.03.2026 23:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh no

02.03.2026 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh no

02.03.2026 15:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Same.

02.03.2026 14:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What even is a β€œcrazy regime” these days? Flouting international law? Threatening your neighbors?

02.03.2026 13:13 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Potentially setting up the craziest possible outcome…

02.03.2026 04:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œTurns out you can just kill bad people and everything is fine” - Gavrilo Princip

02.03.2026 03:03 β€” πŸ‘ 951    πŸ” 124    πŸ’¬ 18    πŸ“Œ 6

The Kingdom of Jordan right now:

02.03.2026 00:59 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

The Kingdom of Jordan right now:

02.03.2026 00:59 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

The thing about war is the other side has a say, too.

01.03.2026 23:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

bsky.app/profile/matt...

01.03.2026 22:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Integralism and Gelasian Dyarchy - The Josias (Note: I have revised the central section of this essay since its original posting in the light of constructive criticism.[1]Β A printable version can be found here). 1. Introduction: Three Theories Po...

I think he might be shoehorning his concept of β€œAugustinian radicalism” from this essay into his analysis of Balthasarians. All the people mentioned there have very strong views on the natural desire for the supernatural but are not Balthasarians.
thejosias.com/2016/03/03/i...

01.03.2026 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

This is nuts.

01.03.2026 21:37 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ€”

01.03.2026 19:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think they learned the wrong lesson from Iraq…

01.03.2026 19:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Blowing things up, kidnapping and killing foreign leaders, is good because it's Doing. Considering the consequences of Doing would be Thinking, which is weak and woke

01.03.2026 17:53 β€” πŸ‘ 4491    πŸ” 720    πŸ’¬ 44    πŸ“Œ 40

β€œHi, it’s me, the guy who blew up the last group of guys I was negotiating with. Would you all be willing to get together, ideally in a compact room above ground under good cloud conditions at daytime to talk this over?”

01.03.2026 17:08 β€” πŸ‘ 495    πŸ” 114    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 1
Post

See new posts
Conversation
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Β·
2h
From US admin official background briefing recording listening to, seriously question if US negotiators understood what Iranians were proposing. One official keeps saying acronym for β€œIAEA” wrong.
They seem astonished Iran would not agree to the US supplying them nuclear fuel
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Β·
2h
They took as suspicious proposals that Iran saw as concessionary.
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Β·
2h
Explains why Oman FM tried to come to DC to explain what US negotiators may not have fully understood
Laura Rozen
@lrozen
Am not saying what Iran proposed would have been enough, I dont know, but it seems US negotiators did not have the expert guidance to understand it correctly

Post See new posts Conversation Laura Rozen @lrozen Β· 2h From US admin official background briefing recording listening to, seriously question if US negotiators understood what Iranians were proposing. One official keeps saying acronym for β€œIAEA” wrong. They seem astonished Iran would not agree to the US supplying them nuclear fuel Laura Rozen @lrozen Β· 2h They took as suspicious proposals that Iran saw as concessionary. Laura Rozen @lrozen Β· 2h Explains why Oman FM tried to come to DC to explain what US negotiators may not have fully understood Laura Rozen @lrozen Am not saying what Iran proposed would have been enough, I dont know, but it seems US negotiators did not have the expert guidance to understand it correctly

On top of all the reporting that this war of aggression was planned well in advance, it seems that the reporting also indicates that the US political leadership are quite literally too stupid to understand basic diplomacy. I mean literally not smart enough.

28.02.2026 23:27 β€” πŸ‘ 8178    πŸ” 2459    πŸ’¬ 232    πŸ“Œ 238

Also it’s not Catholic!

27.02.2026 14:56 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not least coming in a distant fourth place and yet lecturing everyone else on what was wrong with their campaigns!

27.02.2026 14:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

that's not how wars work but okay

27.02.2026 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 552    πŸ” 71    πŸ’¬ 33    πŸ“Œ 2

Grok said so!

27.02.2026 01:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ™‹πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ

26.02.2026 23:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

She’s been released πŸ™πŸ½

26.02.2026 20:58 β€” πŸ‘ 2770    πŸ” 634    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 37

The Conference of Catholic Bishops is... not playing around in this brief.

www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

26.02.2026 20:54 β€” πŸ‘ 3272    πŸ” 1096    πŸ’¬ 117    πŸ“Œ 138
Preview
Top Trump campaign aide identified as key individual in classified docs indictment: Sources Susie Wiles, a top adviser on Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, is among the individuals identified in the classified documents indictment against him, sources tell ABC News.

[6] "Susie Wiles, one of Trump's most trusted advisers leading his second reelection effort, is the individual singled out in Smith's indictment as the 'PAC Representative' who Trump is alleged to have shown a classified map."

abcnews.com/US/top-trump...

26.02.2026 04:41 β€” πŸ‘ 237    πŸ” 63    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 4

What is Daffy listening to?

25.02.2026 21:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Tensions have risen between the firm and the Pentagon in recent weeks over how Anthropic’s AI was applied during the raid to capture Venezuelan President NicolΓ‘s Maduro. Defense officials responded swiftly, suggesting that if Anthropic did not allow the Pentagon to apply the AI as it wants to, within lawful limits, the company would be considered a supply-chain risk, costing it and any firm subcontracting its AI future business opportunities.

Tensions have risen between the firm and the Pentagon in recent weeks over how Anthropic’s AI was applied during the raid to capture Venezuelan President NicolΓ‘s Maduro. Defense officials responded swiftly, suggesting that if Anthropic did not allow the Pentagon to apply the AI as it wants to, within lawful limits, the company would be considered a supply-chain risk, costing it and any firm subcontracting its AI future business opportunities.

At the Tuesday meeting, Hegseth went further, saying Anthropic could be subject to the Defense Production Act β€” which enables the government to gain control of firms and their products β€” in the name of national security. The DPA was used during the covid pandemic to address medical supply shortfalls.

At the Tuesday meeting, Hegseth went further, saying Anthropic could be subject to the Defense Production Act β€” which enables the government to gain control of firms and their products β€” in the name of national security. The DPA was used during the covid pandemic to address medical supply shortfalls.

β€œMake killer robots for us or we’ll take over your company, steal your secrets, and make them anyway.”

24.02.2026 21:51 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0