guys chatgpt o3 is much better than 4o, how many still don't know
21.07.2025 05:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@maifowler.com.bsky.social
performance art 🦋 the follow game is getting out of control 🦋 exploring the limits and sharing my journey 🦋 hope to spark some discussion about how to fix these broken incentives also love: AI, data, incentives, and butterflies
guys chatgpt o3 is much better than 4o, how many still don't know
21.07.2025 05:19 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0exactly, and even if they keep following it's kinda pointless if it's just to inflate follow numbers
03.06.2025 06:00 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0my impression is that technically it's quite easy (most genetic tests can predict eye color with quite high accuracy), and i'm not aware of it being illegal in the us. tho i agree that the more interesting and promising use of embryo screening is for selecting based on health
05.04.2025 12:33 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0it seems possible: www.fertility-docs.com/programs-and...
05.04.2025 12:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0it's currently legal in the us, and obviously feasible to detect gender, for example
05.04.2025 07:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0by the way, in the us it is legal to get designer babies: select for health, but also gender, eye color, height
02.04.2025 12:50 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0omg didn't realize it's the 1st of april. news did seem a bit off today
01.04.2025 12:32 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0lol
11.03.2025 03:33 — 👍 157 🔁 38 💬 24 📌 9you can still follow thousands of account per hour, within those limits
09.03.2025 03:27 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i mean that is how companies works, most things you can't create on your own
08.03.2025 17:49 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i asked gpt-4.5 to create a table with whatever it wanted
08.03.2025 15:24 — 👍 65 🔁 8 💬 3 📌 0it is just a minimal script. even in case you don't code it should be trivial with the help of AI
24.02.2025 13:25 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0😢
24.02.2025 13:23 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0by the way i don't think follow spam accounts should be banned, unless there are really clear rules. rather clear limits or hiding spammy follows would be the best solution
24.02.2025 06:19 — 👍 25 🔁 1 💬 5 📌 0i mean he did create a pretty smart AI at least
23.02.2025 14:11 — 👍 97 🔁 12 💬 11 📌 1how much did you follow that they banned you?
23.02.2025 07:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0but would you still add them if they would not see your follow? in that case there will be no chance of them adding you back. the solution then is, for account that follow a lot, to hide the follows to other users
23.02.2025 07:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0the reasons are above in my post. but you would be right if high amount of follow would be hidden to other users, so you can still follow, but it won't create spam, and people will not use it for follow back farming
23.02.2025 07:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0by the way, when not follow spamming I got 7 likes and 6 comments. with engagement bait. without i got one like for three posts
22.02.2025 18:37 — 👍 27 🔁 1 💬 7 📌 0back to following
22.02.2025 18:35 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 8 📌 0for now
20.02.2025 09:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0it's secret 🤐
20.02.2025 09:03 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0please do not take it personally if you are not in it. the algorithm is ruthless
19.02.2025 07:08 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0the is a small list of accounts i will not unfollow, determined programmatically. for now 4 lucky accounts pass my check
19.02.2025 04:45 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0do you tend to use the discover feed, or rather custom ones?
18.02.2025 06:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0some stats, obviously I was inactive for a bit. i very slowly lost followers in that period
17.02.2025 15:25 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0update before resuming my follow spam. followed ~13k accounts, followed by 3.2k. equivalent a 24% follow back rate
17.02.2025 15:22 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0how can you see posts of all 2.7k follows?
17.02.2025 15:19 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0i believe in you ;)
07.02.2025 15:12 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0