Thank you, @toddneale.bsky.social, for your excellent reporting on our EHJ paper!
@tctmd.bsky.social @escardio.bsky.social @paragbawaskar.bsky.social
@paragbawaskar.bsky.social
Cardiologist, Post Doctoral Research Associate, Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Medical School.
Thank you, @toddneale.bsky.social, for your excellent reporting on our EHJ paper!
@tctmd.bsky.social @escardio.bsky.social @paragbawaskar.bsky.social
Query sarcoid, normal #WhyCMR, so then should we do FDG-PET? Not much benefit.
23.03.2025 05:29 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Read our accompanying editorial for our thoughts on the important paper โ
academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/...
@paragbawaskar.bsky.social #CardioSky #MedSky #Sarcoidosis
In patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, cardiac FDG-PET is recommended after a normal CMR if there is a high clinical suspicion. What are the data supporting this recommendation? #CardioSky #MedSky #Sarcoidosis
21.03.2025 23:39 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 1This paper reports the coexistence of cardiac sarcoidosis and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in 5 patients.
heart.bmj.com/content/earl...
#CardioSky #MedSky
In honor of Dr. Braunwaldโs 95th birthday. The number of areas he has touched in cardiology is staggering, and number of cardiovascular professionals is unquantifiable. @harvardmed.bsky.social
23.11.2024 18:26 โ ๐ 36 ๐ 10 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Amazing achievement by rising star and post-doc in my lab @paragbawaskar.bsky.social, winner of the prestigious 2024 Melvin Judkins Early Career Investigator Award at #AHA24!! Congratulations!!!
@ahascience.bsky.social
Itโs great that journals are coming over here, but what I have really missed after my departure from Twitter 2 years ago is this, the authors themselves presenting their works and discussing it with peers. #cardiosky #medsky #emimcc
13.11.2024 15:58 โ ๐ 31 ๐ 7 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Figure 2 from the paper. Incidence of embolism in left ventricular (LV) thrombus patients compared with matched non-LV thrombus patients. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrate the cumulative incidence of the composite embolic end point in the LV thrombus (in red) and in the matched non-LV thrombus (in blue) groups. Note the significant difference in the cumulative incidence of embolic events between the 2 groups.
In 2019, we wrote a paper showing that patients with left ventricular thrombus have a long-term risk of embolism, extending to at least 8 years.
We were puzzled by the findingโฆ
#CardioSky
www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/...
Finally, many thanks to @cshenoy.bsky.social for his mentorship, our outstanding team for their contributions, and the editors and reviewers at Circulation for all their efforts to make our paper better!
11.11.2023 04:23 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Read our paper here โhttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067032
And if you will be at #AHA23, come visit the poster session on Monday, Nov 13, 10:00-11.30 am, Zone 2.
eppro01.ativ.me/src/EventPil...
An important trial related to this topic was just funded in the UK โ Peter Swoboda at the University of Leeds is the PI of an RCT to identify the best initial test for newly diagnosed HFโฆ we look forward to the results of CROSS-HF in a few years.
11.11.2023 04:22 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And if NICM and dualCM do influence outcomes, the next trial should investigate whether the routine use of CMR to identify the cause of cardiomyopathy improves the selection of patients for coronary revascularization, and overall long-term outcomes.
11.11.2023 04:22 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0We need to investigate whether NICM or dualCM in patients with CAD influences outcomes after coronary revascularization.
An ancillary study of the STICH3C trial by Mario Gaudino and Jonathan Weinsaft at Cornell will give us some answers in about 5 years.
So what? Patients with CAD+NICM or dualCM should be treated with a statin, aspirin, and guideline-directed HF therapy the same as those with CAD+ICM.
But do patients with CAD+ NICM or dualCM benefit from coronary revascularization in the same manner as those with CAD+ICM?
Prior studies have found better outcomes for NICM vs. ICM. What explains worse outcomes for NICM in our study?
We can only speculate, but it may be because patients in our study had 2-3 diseases โ CAD+NICMโฆ or CAD+ICM+NICM.
Prior studies compared NICM without CAD to ICM+CAD.
And we looked at their long-term outcomes.
Patients with CAD+NICM or dualCM had a greater risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization, all-cause death, and heart failure hospitalization compared with CAD+ICM.
The risk of CV death was not different.
We found NICM or dualCM in 1 of every 6 patients with CAD.
CAD+NoCM - 18.2%
CAD+ICM - 64.8%
CAD+NICM - 9.3%
CAD+dualCM - 7.7%
The prevalence of CAD+NICM or dualCM was 16.9% or 1 in 6 patients with CAD.
We looked at their CMRs and coronary angiography data and classified them into one of:
1. No cardiomyopathy (CAD+NoCM) โ normal LVEF and no LGE
2. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (CAD+ICM)
3. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (CAD+NICM)
4. Dual cardiomyopathy (CAD+dualCM) โ both ICM and NICM
We did a large retrospective observational study of 3,023 patients with obstructive CAD who had CMR for any clinical indication at our health system.
11.11.2023 04:12 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0So how often do patients with CAD have NICM or dual (both ICM and NICM) cardiomyopathy?
How do these patients do compared to patients with ICM?
We tried to answer these questions.
There has been interest in this topic of late because trials of coronary revascularization other than STICHES have not shown revascularization to be beneficial.
11.11.2023 04:11 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Currently, we determine the cause of cardiomyopathy based on coronary angiography findingsโฆ CAD=ICM; No CAD=NICM
However, pathology and small CMR studies have shown that
NICM can occur with โbystanderโ CAD
ICM can occur without CAD
Both ICM and NICM can occur together
Have you ever wondered whether your patient with CAD and cardiomyopathy truly has ischemic cardiomyopathy, or whether the CAD is a โbystanderโ?
You might be interested in our paper now out in Circulation
#simultaneouspublication
#AHA23
#cardiosky
#Medsky
#WhyCMR