too coherent - have you tried going bigger picture?
Don't think that crossed my mind
Apparently I was convinced my (turns out) little sister was definitely going to be a labrador
To paraphrase Jane Goodall, “now we must redefine tool, redefine man, or accept cows as human.”
To paraphrase Veronika the cow, "moo, that hits the spot".
www.cell.com/current-biol...
At the Warwick Babylab we have an exciting new study about 4-year-olds' language learning. If you are keen to take part with your 4-year-old, please register your interest using this form and we'll get in touch with more information (warwick.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...).
It only just about works if you say it out loud
"I get really frustrated when I can't think of the superfamily containing Hylobatidae, Pongidae and Hominidae."
"Hominoid."
"Yeah so am I."
Sofa crisp roulette
Bonobo 'Yuli' and her one week old baby boy inside the house 1 of 2 @twycrosszoo.bsky.social #bonobo #primates
These are absolutely fantastic. Only got the slightest glimpse the other day
📣📣📣🎉🎉🎉 Our very first Stage 1 RR is accepted in principle at Developmental Science!!! All thanks to the hard work of @eddonnellan.bsky.social brilliant collab with @katemessenger.bsky.social and of course funding from @leverhulme.ac.uk Data collection starting soon! Pre-print: osf.io/preprints/ps...
Last night I had breakfast for dinner. Today I had breakfast for breakfast. And they said I could be tamed.
Conclave 2: Pope in the City
Come on fungi. Do your stuff already
Weird it wasn't a Polar Bus Replacement
How soon is now
Sounds perfect! "Oh no, it's a two-day hike to reply to that email".
Binoculars?
Soon...
I mostly do research into language development, chimp communication and information-seeking behaviour.
Currently collecting data on prediction error-based language learning in 4 year olds (e.g., osf.io/rfq6u, osf.io/v5pzb/)
See pubs here: scholar.google.com/citations?us...
link.springer.com/article/10.3...
This paper creates a combined accuracy and RT measure (SRT) from Flanker tasks, but the raw data includes them separately... Might be nice to compare ddm against their findings.. (OK I'll stop)
In about 2 years we should have some flanker data from ~95 four year olds... So hold tight
Sounds like they should be trying to find flanker data then! Got to be some open data out there (probably best from kids so there's good variability in accuracy and RTs)
Ah yes - correct. On No-Go trials you only get RTs for incorrect
Caveat - actually participants were pretty accurate, so may not be what you're looking for - though there's some variation in the RTs.
n=564, 50 trials. Loads of other variables you could use as IVs in there too. Let me know if you want me to explain the data structure...
You could try the data accompanying our Psych Methods paper (osf.io/g7nbw/). There's a Go/No-Go task (described here under "Reaction Time Experiments" psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...) - which you can treat as a binary response (correct or not) with RTs.
