Help me understand- are you seeing this as a positive or negative?
23.11.2025 13:00 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@finkelsteinfan.bsky.social
Parody account - nothing is to be taken seriously nor at face value.
Help me understand- are you seeing this as a positive or negative?
23.11.2025 13:00 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I agree with everything youโre saying, my point was that questioning the numbers, the methodology or the exact intent should not be a crime.
And Iโm speaking as someone who believes the mainstream narrative about the Holocaust - at this point, I have no reason to doubt it.
Thanks for chatting Lynda.
Much appreciated.
Exactly right.
So what good has all this Holocaust education and criminalization done?
We were talking about revisionism, not denial.
Again, youโre obfuscating and conflating.
How do you protect lives by criminalizing the questioning of a historical moment?
23.11.2025 03:44 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I didnโt call it โjust another crimeโ, Iโm questioning the criminalization of questioning the Holocaust.
No other atrocity is criminalized
There is literally no precedent for it, an has the very real risk of backfiring.
Sure, but the numbers can be revised.
Thatโs revisionist, not denial.
Your conflation of the two is dangerous.
Being systematic, industrialized and aimed at erasing a people isnโt unique.
In fact the Nazis have openly talked about being inspired Abby other atrocities - Armenia and the genocide of native Americans, for example.
Yup!
Youโre one of the few.
Keep it up!
And yet protecting truth is not seen as any kind of priority with anything else.
If itโs truly truthful it wouldnโt need any laws to protect it.
I wouldnโt be arresting flat earthers even though I know the truth about the planet.
Your logic is flawed.
This only creates more doubt.
Denying is different than questioning, completely different.
Iโm happy to believe 6 million died, even though I havenโt scrutinized every single death.
If someone proposes another number I would like to hear their evidence first.
And thatโs with any historical subject.
The Holocaust is not the only event in which people were killed systematically. If youโve studied history you would know that.
But right now youโre treating it like the one exceptional crime.
It isnโt.
Israel and the US did this. ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐บ๐ธ
22.11.2025 18:50 โ ๐ 10 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It seems that the Holocaust is such a thoroughly established โfactโ, that many western countries adopted laws against questioning it.
If someone questions the numbers, the methodology, or even the reasons, then they are in breach.
No other piece of history does this.
Why?
Since the beginning of the war we all knew that Ukraine would have to give up land for peace.
There was no way around it - except now hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost.
Same deal.
Iโve never heard him deny the holocaust, i suppose itโs important to be accurate when criticizing him.
Revisionism isnโt the same as denial - it seems one can question all aspects of history except this one.
Why is that?
Fiber optic drones seem to be the way of the future?
It seems no wireless signal is immune to jamming, the only other way is preprogrammed drones with internal gps.
Thank you for taking the time to post this, much appreciated.
Would you say that this is an example of Holocaust revisionism rather than denial?
Iโve never seen him deny the holocaust - perhaps you have a link you can share?
And no, Iโm not nick Fuentes.
First off, I want to remind you that Iโm not Nick.
Secondly, youโre wrong : Fuentes is too popular to be ignored.
Meanwhile Ukraine is literally running out of soldiers.
22.11.2025 11:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0People like Dr Jack Brown are just warmongers disguised as moralistic justice warriors.
Better we stop the war and save lives then to continue this madness.
It wasnโt his lawyer qualifications that got him in.
22.11.2025 10:46 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0WTF is going on?
Well, both people got elected despite heavy opposition from their own parties, their adversaries and the media.
Which may partly explain Trumpโs admiration.
Heโs saying the so called revolution was in fact outside intervention from foreign agents.
But Zelensky wasnโt into politics back then.
True - some people just search relentlessly for conspiracies.
Some of them are friends of mine!
Fair points brother.
I like to stay skeptical.
Are you speaking of all vaccines or specific ones?
Personally Iโm all vaxxed up, but during covid I just did the initial double jab and left it at that.
Iโm not against people taking seasonal flu vaccines,for example. To each their own
Ooh, touchy subject.
One side claims to be on the side of science, the other says science has been politicized for the sake of profit and other motives.