My secret is I'm actually one trans woman stacked in a trench coat.
Read 'Macrohard' and thought 'well that's a bit on the nose'.
Then I kept reading. Jesus fucking christ.
Pluto received a classification upon discovery that did not match its lived experience, which was reclassified to something that works much better for its situation.
Now, countless people on the internet insist they know better and that this reclassification was incorrect.
Pluto is trans.
leaders like trump are why sun tzu had to write a bunch of advice like "don't write your enemy a letter detailing what tactics you really don't want them to do"
I think this recent bout of insomnia/sleep deprivation/sleep schedule kerfuffle is fucking with my menstrual cycle, cause I swear it just made this face.
Millennial preacher: "The kids are cooked with their 6 7 nonsense. Not like our cultured millennial 420 and 69."
Millennial audience, nodding sagely: "Nice."
Incorrect poem
Certain to piss off many
It's masterful bait
If you're a cis woman and another cis person assumes you're trans they mean it negatively. If you're a cis woman and trans women assume you're trans it means you're the coolest bitch to ever live.
Also, and I feel this needs to be said more often, there is not a single definition of 'woman' that includes 100% of cis women and excludes 100% of trans women. None. It doesn't exist.
Not in a court of law, no.
If the sky being green was core to a transphobe's argument, they'd somehow con themselves into believing the sky is green so fundamentally that nothing you do, say, or show can ever change their mind.
This is why arguing with transphobes is a waste of time, by the way. Not because they're right, but because they're so spectacularly wrong they need to have perfected the skill ignoring basic facts in order to be able to believe the shit they believe.
Seriously, it's fucking embarrassing. Y'all claim 'basic biology' and don't know what an adam's apple is, it's pathetic.
Transphobes google what an adam's apple is challenge 2026.
Try hard enough and maybe one day you too can read 'cloth gown' correctly on the first go.
I mean, I think I have a pretty good hunch, but I can't be a hundred 100% certain so I'd love to ask for confirmation anyway?
Oh, and Muslims. Can't forget blaming Muslims. They should've just been okay with their people getting bombed to shit.
If I was a betting woman, I'd put money on the Dems blaming leftists and queer people for the humiliating defeat they're setting themselves up for by not doing the bare fucking minimum again.
Lifehack: Engaging with things honestly and in good faith; and allowing yourself to enjoy things unironically will drastically improve your mood.
It might also make you mildly less insufferable!
Are they Great Balls?
But your question wasn't 'is your door safe?' It was 'would the other guy say their door is safe?'
Regardless of who you speak to, if the answer is 'yes', the door is dangerous.
If the right guard is honest, and answers 'no', then that means that the left guard would not have sent you to the left door. In this case, the left guard is dishonest, and would have sent you to the wrong door, meaning the left door is safe.
That's my point, though. So many people *think* they know it, but act as if 'I'll just ask the guards what hair colour they have' is an entire solution.
Exactly that, yeah. When you make a human character, all of the characterisation has to come from you. When you make an elf or an orc, that already says something about them.
Also, bsky insists your comment was written in French for some reason?
Here's a take that will get me in hot water with certain corners of the internet:
Humans aren't a boring fantasy/RPG race. They're a blank canvas. You just gotta put in more effort into making them interesting.
You don't need to 'outsmart' the puzzle. A good puzzle wants to be solved. And if you engage with it honestly and in good faith, reaching the solution is so much more rewarding than twisting the premise to be worse than it is.
And... I like it! I like it a lot. The puzzle is elegant, clean, and simple to comprehend. It's a classic for a reason.
There's other questions you can ask that also work ('If I asked you if that door leads to freedom, would your answer be yes?'), but those don't undermine the basic premise.
At no point here do you figure out which of the guards is the liar and which the truth-sayer. You ask the question to one of them, get pointed to a door, and then pick the other door. The truth/lies question doesn't factor into it at all. It's a mechanic for the puzzle, not the puzzle itself.
If you ask it of the liar, they would falsely surmise their colleague would lie, and point to the wrong door.
No matter who you ask it of, you will be pointed to the door behind which lays death. All you have to do is thank them politely, walk up to the other door, and leave.
