We need more advocates to tell City Council to stop meting out new responsibilities to L&I.
09.12.2025 14:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@philiberty.bsky.social
Rational, urban, non-edgy, lawyer #YIMBY #Decrim #OpenBorders Follow @lpphilly.bsky.social for official content and announcements
We need more advocates to tell City Council to stop meting out new responsibilities to L&I.
09.12.2025 14:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It's a scam in the exaggerated sense of the term because fusion parties are fake vassals for the major parties and NY's 2020 election reforms greatly limiting third-party ballot access should not be justified by their continued existence.
09.12.2025 14:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The latest round of Antisemites coming out of the woodwork has educated me on how a surprising number of people actually believe in the Devil and demons as real malevolent forces. How I, a Jew, apparently serve an entity I was unaware of further complicates the idea that the Devil hides himself.
08.12.2025 23:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0this is very cute and dare I say YIMBY www.inquirer.com/education/se...
08.12.2025 18:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Philly native!
05.12.2025 19:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0My entire argument was indifferent to the business and focused on unemployment effects.
05.12.2025 16:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I'm not arguing against it.
I'm arguing against the move some people make where they waive away the cost of labor as if it's actually profitable to pay people more in all situations
The purchasing power of labor overall makes labor less costly but it cannot overcome the entire cost
05.12.2025 15:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No that's a fundamental misunderstanding of how the economy works. Labor is not a perpetual motion machine. Wealth gets created when people create more desired goods and services more efficiently. Labor is simply one input into that.
05.12.2025 15:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0No, the point is that these jobs are lost and not readily replaced in the economy. Given the pay, these people are most susceptible to being forced out of the workforce permanently as they cannot provide enough value for an employer given the increased cost of their labor
05.12.2025 14:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Honest advocates will accept the tradeoffs (though they may dispute the size) and look to make it up with welfare and training programs or whatever. Early proponents in the early 20th century actually intended unemployment because they wanted blacks, immigrants, and single women out of the workforce
05.12.2025 14:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0There's plenty of studies to affirm the unemployment effect of raising the minimum wage. The CBO scores every federal increase proposal with how many jobs would be lost.
05.12.2025 14:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I just explained how many would be unemployed.
05.12.2025 14:19 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If they were able to get better paying jobs generally speaking they would do that. Raising the minimum wage doesn't alter profitability elsewhere. So generally speaking employers will reduce hours and headcount or automate and there will be fewer entry level jobs.
05.12.2025 14:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's hard for me to not see the activists as the predatory ones looking to fit the square peg of "founding population aging in place" into the round hole of "problems that will occupy activists' time and produce something like a victory"
04.12.2025 19:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0While our last report revealed that students and other people younger than 24 made up a large part of the gentrifying population, many of the new, non-Asian residents to move into the Chinatowns are older and wealthier than the prior decade. β’ The share of family households in each Chinatown increased over the past decade, in a sharp reversal from our findings in the previous decade. β’ The 18-24 age group also decreased by the largest percentage in each Chinatown. The 25-64 category increased in Manhattan and Philadelphiaβs Chinatowns, and decreased at less than half the rate of 18-24-year-olds in Boston. β’ Residents of Bostonβs and Philadelphiaβs Chinatowns also became much wealthier. Median income increased by 14% in Bostonβs Chinatown to reach $59,664 ($38,000 lower than the $97,865 median for the city overall), by 13% to reach $109,866 in Philadelphia (much higher than the citywide median of $63,000), and by 2% to reach $55,228 in New York (compared to $84,000 citywide). β’ As a result of the faster increase in housing costs than in income, the share of households that are cost burdened (paying more than 30% of their income on housing costs) increased in all three Chinatowns, reaching 41% in Boston, 47% in Manhattan, and 26% in Philadelphia. These levels of cost burdened households are higher than in the overall city for Boston and New York and contribute to the difficulty for long term residents to stay there and recent immigrants with limited income to move in.
There is nothing to say to people who look at a displacement trend driven by cultural preferences, and think they can downzone their way to preservation. You can't prevent elderly Asians from moving out or dying, and you can't prevent non-Asians from moving into old units thanks to fair housing!
04.12.2025 18:23 β π 17 π 2 π¬ 3 π 1The Asian population remained the same and is mostly aging in place as families have left to the suburbs. Not sure anything needs to be done about that.
04.12.2025 17:58 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Unless you're a trade press writing to those who hold certain assets...
04.12.2025 17:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Rep. Rick Krajewski: "We need to hate rich people again. We need to hate rich people again in this country. Right?" www.youtube.com/shorts/w6QLX...
We need to be ashamed of stoking baseless hatred again in this country.
Yet you accept that human driver risk is being imposed on you today? If you're concerned about accountability, determining the fault or error if any that caused an injury is far more straightforward and likely to result in consequences than the vagaries of finding drivers liable now
03.12.2025 20:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Compared to human drivers? Human error is by far the biggest danger on the road.
03.12.2025 17:34 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The non-productivity would be in case the human drivers couldn't compete in open competition against Waymo.
03.12.2025 17:33 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I like safety and choice. I don't like forcing people to support unproductive or unnecessary jobs.
03.12.2025 17:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I for one welcome our new robot taxicabs
03.12.2025 16:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0NYC has one to commemorate the inauguration of George Washington. It was meant to echo the Roman Republic. So I'm not all that sure about the sole association.
03.12.2025 16:08 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0WAY MO WAYMO! whyy.org/articles/way...
03.12.2025 15:56 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1Is the overall suppressive effect of the review and vetogate worth it to prevent a couple of instances of slop here and there?
02.12.2025 20:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I ask because your column seems to imply that any project must have some referent or be some kind of iterative work on what's already nearby
02.12.2025 18:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I mean this sincerely as a question, do you consider any attempt to progress and build a new aesthetic--create a new history--as facially improper?
02.12.2025 18:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It's cute how socialists of all stripes love invoking the "Working Families" mantra.
02.12.2025 15:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0