Tejas N. Narechania's Avatar

Tejas N. Narechania

@tnarecha.bsky.social

Professor of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law. "[A]cademic and informed commentator." Main interests, alphabetically: administrative law; federal courts; intellectual property; Internet & telecom. regulation. Publications: http://bit.ly/tnarecha

1,171 Followers  |  503 Following  |  63 Posts  |  Joined: 05.10.2023  |  1.9844

Latest posts by tnarecha.bsky.social on Bluesky

Not really an overstatement to say that the test of a free society is whether or not comedians can make fun of the country's leader on TV without repurcussions.

18.07.2025 15:39 β€” πŸ‘ 60531    πŸ” 14740    πŸ’¬ 1254    πŸ“Œ 633
California Proposed A Law Making Broadband Affordable For Poor People. Telecom Lobbyists Have Already Destroyed It. Last January, Democratic California Assemblymember Tasha Boerner introduced the California Affordable Home Internet ActΒ (AB 353), which mandated that large ISPs in the state needed to provide broad…

I wrote a little bit about how California proposed a law making broadband affordable for poor people.

And how telecom lobbyists have already destroyed the effort:

16.07.2025 14:20 β€” πŸ‘ 180    πŸ” 69    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Big changes unfolding for CA housing Between an increasingly influential union and a new state housing agency, one of California’s biggest crises is getting a shakeup.

UC Berkeley Law Professor Tejas Narechania (@tnarecha.bsky.social) weighed in on CA's effort to regulate streaming services, saying it can attempt to enact β€œconsumer protections aimed at California residents, even if they affected out-of-state content providers.” calmatters.org/newsletter/c...

11.07.2025 18:48 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

lol! well, at least there's always money...

08.07.2025 03:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is a Daniel Tiger recipe. And, as any Daniel Tiger-watching parent knows, this recipe will disappoint children and adults alike.

08.07.2025 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

From a discretionary denial decision last week: "it is an inefficient use of Board resources to review the ’540 patent that has been dismissed from the litigation."

So if it's in litigation, it's a waste of resources to review. And if it isn't... it's a waste of resources to review.

GMAFB.

30.06.2025 21:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But still deceptively advertised, see bsky.app/profile/tnar...

25.06.2025 22:58 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But it still says "brought to life in the USA" which would seem to run afoul of FTC guidelines, see www.ftc.gov/business-gui...

What will Andrew Ferguson do?? Probably nothing.

25.06.2025 22:56 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

a fairness doctrine for polarized media

25.06.2025 21:19 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think yes as a matter of (c) law, but perhaps no as a matter of contract law, depending on the subscription's Terms of Use. If this holds, the distinction btw property & contract rules--elaborated most recently by the Supreme Court in Lexmark v. Impression Products--may become even more important.

24.06.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great piece + thread

23.06.2025 18:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A screenshot from SSRN that reads: "The Federalist’s Dilemma: State AI Regulation & Pathways Forward. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 25-07."

A screenshot from SSRN that reads: "The Federalist’s Dilemma: State AI Regulation & Pathways Forward. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 25-07."

23.06.2025 04:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Why federalism should embrace a federal moratorium on state regulation of AI is ... a take.

Exactly the sort of post-hoc ends-oriented nonsense you'd expect

23.06.2025 04:05 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

AI governance is (at least) a competition problem, more than a copyright problem.

19.06.2025 16:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The other *new* bad part of the moratorium is that it also changes the BEAD program to be an AI subsidy program. BEAD is meant for broadband deployment to low income and rural areas. Cruz added the option for states to spend the money instead on AI deployment. It’s a giveaway to Silicon Valley.

06.06.2025 14:32 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

maybe this will fix itself πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

05.06.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Turning a promising program for bridging the digital divide into an Elon Musk giveaway.

Infuriating.

04.06.2025 15:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

But what is "good" penmanship? I, for example, have developed a novel script that features a unique way of connecting d's to other letters, of writing common words such as "the," & of more efficiently writing s's at the end of words. Such innovations should surely be rewarded on the teaching market.

02.06.2025 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks, @ssrn.bsky.social, for highlighting my recent work with the brilliant Scott Shenker!

29.05.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Latest Research on Cybersecurity & Data Privacy This list includes a selection of the latest research on cybersecurity & data privacy posted to SSRN in 2025. Understanding the Cyber Risks of Artificial Intelligence: An Ongoing, Comprehensive…

Check out the latest from the SSRN #blog which includes a selection of recent #research on #cybersecurity & data privacy.

Read more: http://spkl.io/63320ffily

#Academicsky #AcademicChatter #dataprivacy

29.05.2025 11:30 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Certiorari in Important Cases The Supreme Court has wide discretion to choose the cases it will decide. But how does the Court exercise this discretion? The Supreme Court’s rules explain tha

Again, for the folks in the back:

The Roberts Court is historically unique in its willingness to hear cases to reconsider and overrule precedent.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

22.05.2025 23:31 β€” πŸ‘ 50    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

Just at me OK?

22.05.2025 15:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is summer research salary a tip for good academic year service?

21.05.2025 15:32 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Before funding these tax-and-transfer bailouts for AT&T and other telcos, we should force those companies to account for the billions of dollars they've already wasted. See, e.g., harvardlawreview.org/blog/2024/07...

20.05.2025 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

FTC, where you at?

13.05.2025 16:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

PS: The reader --- and all course materials --- are free for students!

12.05.2025 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Regulated Digital Industries, Chapter 1: Fundamentals (2025 Update) This is the Table of Contents (and first case excerpt) for a reader on a class on Regulated Digital Industries, namely, the telecommunications, internet, and me

Hey @ucberkeleylaw.bsky.social and @bclt.bsky.social students (and fellow telecom profs)! Wondering what's on tap for my Fall telecom ("Regulated Digital Industries") class? Check out a preview of the course reader here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

TikTok, broadband, net neutrality, oh my!

12.05.2025 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Amazing. And then re-auctioned! This story might have to make it into the book...

02.05.2025 16:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Do you know what happened at the hearing? I forgot about that case...

02.05.2025 16:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wow 🀩!

01.05.2025 02:47 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@tnarecha is following 20 prominent accounts