Agree. We found similar for incident cvd in twins - higher crea good/ but higher cyst c bad. But time for a redo with more events
www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10....
Great news for everybodys T(thought)-index.
Major achievement!
It was always on my mind🎵
Hm... 😉👇
Thesis in print from my PhD student Agnes Wahrenberg this week !
Studies on register-based family history of cardiovascular disease : from preclinical to recurrent disease doi.org/10.69622/282...
Proud moment for a supervisor.
Wow ! Amazing!
With Steve Nieve ?
Wonder if the rest of the attractions still standing?
open.spotify.com/track/5PtUxC...
Yes but still kind of reassuring (if you for some reason want to wait with tx) that you needed to randomize 1600 pts with these BP levels and follow them for 24 months to see an effect. Although looking at the p-values in retrospect it probably should have been stopped earlier….
Please see DM for tip
Yes and the BP levels at which they randomized quite staggering with todays perspective, SBP 180-230…., 175 was nt worthwhile I guess😉. The era of 100 plus age is normal😉
In Sweden, that is...
So maybe we should have kept to supine
Not like you did that I’m aware of.
But if you look on older RCTs they used supine BP. Like this one
www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Interesting !
Used to be the Swedish standard until we adopted international standards (sitting) 10-15 years ago 😉
