LyndaGood

By killing this bill, Congress sent a clear message: protecting careers beats protecting people every. single. time. Survivors deserve more than symbolic gestures they deserve a system that actually listens.

Instead, lawmakers voted to keep the curtain drawn, preserving a culture of silence and privilege.

Transparency? Accountability? In Washington, those are inconvenient truths. Why let them ruin a good reputation when you can have endless secrecy instead?

Congress Kills Bill Exposing Congressional Sexual Misconduct | 77 WABC (Washington, DC) - The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to reject a resolution that would have required the public release of reports related to sexual harassment and miscond

Once again, Congress has shown it would rather protect its own than protect the public. The latest casualty? A bill that would have exposed sexual misconduct by members of Congress, giving survivors a fighting chance and the public a right to know.

Without firm conditions, oversight, or a clear exit strategy, any funding risks locking the U.S. into a messy, undefined conflict a frustrating mess for lawmakers and voters alike.

Critics counter that handing him more money now is basically rewarding unauthorized war making and letting the president sidestep Congress.

Democrats are caught between doing the politically right thing (oppose the war) and doing the practically safe thing (keep the military supplied).

‘We’re in it’: Democrats won’t rule out giving Trump more money for Middle East war Democrats will have to balance a desire to criticize Trump’s offensive in Iran with pressure to support funding to defend the nation now at war.

Some Democrats are signaling they might give Trump more money for his Middle East war, even though many in the party oppose the conflict. They argue it’s not because they support the war they just don’t want to leave troops underfunded or compromise national security.

No military objective,no “collateral damage,”no geopolitical calculation can ever justify this. This is not war it’s a crime against humanity.Every nation, every leader, every citizen who claims moral conscience must look at these images and feel shame, outrage,and the urgent responsibility to act.

And now, the earth itself is being reshaped to hold the grief the graves being dug for little bodies that should have been learning, laughing, living.

Mary L Trump • Follow .•• X One hundred and sixty-five children were killed in a U.S.-Israeli strike on their elementary school. This is an aerial image of the graves being prepared for their bodies. I defy anyone to justify this. FREN

One hundred and sixty-five children killed. One hundred and sixty-five tiny futures erased in an instant. Their classrooms, their playgrounds, turned into a scene of unspeakable horror.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now directing his "Make America Healthy Again" agenda at a Massachusetts staple. DUNKIN' RFK Jr.'s health push takes aim at Massachusetts coffee staple BOSTON YOUR LOCAL STATION

I don’t even drink their coffee.
But I have to ask, if we drink it off of a toilet seat with a straw will that make it healthier ?

It’s this:

Who decides when Americans fight and die one person, or the branch of government designed to represent the people?

That’s the constitutional tension at the heart of this moment.

For decades, both parties have gradually ceded war making authority to presidents. Once Congress gives up that power, it rarely reclaims it. This vote continues that pattern.

So the real question isn’t just whether you support or oppose this war.

Even if the resolution had passed both chambers, Trump could veto it and overriding that would require a two thirds majority.

The bigger issue

If the conflict is necessary for national security,it should withstand debate and a vote.

The political reality

Republicans largely argued that tying the president’s hands during ongoing conflict would project weakness.Democrats argued the vote was about constitutional balance and accountability.

If the administration’s justifications for the war are shifting, that’s precisely when oversight should intensify not disappear. If more American casualties are possible, lawmakers should be on record authorizing that risk.

When the Senate blocks even a serious effort to rein in executive war authority, it signals something bigger:

Congress is choosing not to challenge the executive branch in the middle of an active conflict.

Why this matters

This isn’t just about Trump. It’s about whether Congress is willing to assert its constitutional role.

The Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.Presidents can respond to imminent threats, but sustained military campaigns are supposed to require legislative backing.

It would have required Congress to authorize further hostilities, reinforcing the authority laid out in the War Powers Resolution of 1973 a law designed to prevent presidents from engaging in prolonged military conflicts without congressional approval.

The measure was led by Tim Kaine and supported by Rand Paul. Notably, John Fetterman broke with many Democrats and voted against advancing it.

What the resolution would have done

US Senate fails to advance war powers measure to rein in Trump’s Iran war In 47-52 procedural vote, a resolution to curtail Trump's powers was defeated, though a separate House vote is expected.

The United States Senate voted down a war powers resolution that would have limited Trump’s ability to continue military action against Iran without explicit congressional approval. The vote failed 47–53.

But don’t worry Trump will be there, endorsing winners and telling everyone else to drop out, because nothing says “let the people choose” like a televised tantrum demanding surrender.

Texas voters might want to remind him: the ballot box doesn’t care about his “record numbers.”

Funny how he claims to love Texas, but apparently only when it votes the way he says. Meanwhile, the “Radical Left Opponent” he’s worried about might just be the one actually letting voters decide.

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump The Republican Primary Race for the United States Senate in the Great State of Texas, a State I LOVE and won 3 times in Record Numbers (the HIGHEST vote ever recorded, by far!!!), cannot, for the good of the Party, and our Country, itself, be allowed to go on any longer. IT MUST STOP NOW! We have an easy to beat, Radical Left Opponent, and we have to TOTALLY FOCUS on putting him away, quickly and decisively! Both John and Ken ran great races, but not good enough. Now, this one, must be PERFECT! My Endorsements within the Republican Party have been virtually insurmountable! It is such an honor to realize and say that almost everyone I Endorse WINS, and wins by a lot, especially in Texas! I will be making my Endorsement soon, and will be asking the candidate that I don't Endorse to immediately DROP OUT OF THE RACE! Is that fair? We must win in November!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

The classic Trump “stop the primary so my favorite wins” playbook. According to this logic, democracy only works if he gets to choose the outcome and apparently, anyone else running is “not good enough,” no matter how Texans vote.

The EEOC lawsuit isn’t just paperwork. It’s a loud reminder that progress isn’t guaranteed, and equality isn’t optional. Locked doors today can lead to locked opportunities tomorrow. Civil rights don’t enforce themselves and human dignity shouldn’t need a lawsuit to protect it.

If society shrugs at this, it sets the tone for every other corner where discrimination can quietly fester in promotions, pay, safety, and opportunity.

We should care because this is racism in its rawest form: denial of dignity, retaliation for speaking out, and the audacity to act as if basic humanity is optional. A restroom seems small, but it’s about access, respect, and human decency.

Imagine showing up to work and being told you don’t get to use the restroom on site. Your white colleagues go freely, while you’re shuttled across the street. A supervisor speaks up and gets fired. This isn’t a distant history lesson. This is Memphis. This is now.

Locking Black employees out of restrooms, forcing them to use a gas station bathroom, and punishing a supervisor for standing up that’s not just “bad management,”that’s old-school racism, dressed up like corporate policy.

‘No Blacks Allowed? Bonkers!’: Memphis Cemetery That Put Locks on Restroom and Made Black Workers Use a Gas Station Toilet Faces Federal Lawsuit "Shocking discrimination at Memphis cemetery sparks federal lawsuit. Black workers barred from restrooms. Outrageous details inside! #Civ...

Locked Out in 2026: Racism in Plain Sight

It’s 2026, and we’re still seeing the same disgusting patterns that were supposed to be dead and buried with Jim Crow.

If nothing else,this moment exposes a crack in the reflexive partisan shield.Oversight isn’t betrayal. It’s not disloyalty. It’s the job.

And if five Republicans can remember that, perhaps there’s hope that Congress might someday rediscover its spine.

Stranger things have happened.Just not lately.