's Avatar

@bleerggg.bsky.social

61 Followers  |  57 Following  |  28 Posts  |  Joined: 25.09.2025  |  2.1638

Latest posts by bleerggg.bsky.social on Bluesky

Shameless

10.10.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Possiblity of the concept of a plan: Yes. It's just "below the leadership level"...so πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

10.10.2025 20:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's a good line, but it's also not true.

10.10.2025 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Many of people that think this also tend to be moderate to moderate-ish, often lower information voters who like to performatively rant against both parties. I don't think they'll repent. Perhaps others will.

10.10.2025 17:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not quite. They'd be fine with it if they approved of his actions.

10.10.2025 16:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sure. That said neither Bernie/squad actually facing the task of governing a major city or leading the minority in Congress. We can't test it, but I submit they'd less popular among socialists if they were.

Also: I didn't mean the criticism is illegitimate, just that it's predictable and amusing.

09.10.2025 18:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We all know that him acting at least quasi-moderate a likely outcome, another one being that his support collapses.

You say "principles", I say melancholy, nostalgia, or general lack of sense
But, yes his natural allies will make things harder for him one way or another. Lol πŸ˜‚

09.10.2025 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Ok, but you and your press team then failed to get Tony Danza and other additional Who's the Boss cast to also retweet? Huge missed opportunity. I'd consider firing your PR team, if we're you. Malpractice.

09.10.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ™

09.10.2025 15:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
2019 emails boost White House's view that furloughed workers aren't guaranteed back pay The OMB's interpretation of the law has roiled Congress, outraged labor unions and added a layer of tension to the federal shutdown that began Oct. 1.

@nicholasbednar.bsky.social

What? Secret amendment? I don't remember it reported this way at the time.

www.axios.com/2025/10/09/s...

09.10.2025 11:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

*hangs head* In Anthony Kennedy voice, "Civility is dying."

08.10.2025 11:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe...I don't think so unless more of the old GOP bulls like Cornyn, Thune etc get replaced by MAGA. They'd see it as too dangerous.

08.10.2025 11:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I was going to post this at you.

So your take is that an affected employee could sue and would likely win? Is there anything here other than desperate trolling?

07.10.2025 12:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I used to think that but I'm not so sure any more.

There's a definite conservative legal movement faction that cares way more about gay marriage than taxes.

Maybe it's only a few guys in the corner. Their numbers may be small. But their influence seems to be growing. You'd know better than me.

07.10.2025 02:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"answer the question you wish you were asked, not the question you were asked" Wurman has done his DC media training

06.10.2025 18:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Brilliant. I'll take it.

06.10.2025 16:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's only about book sales, Id wager. This topic is an old standard, especially when a scientist is involved in the book. It's only about getting sales

06.10.2025 10:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyday

05.10.2025 16:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He wouldn't condone lawlessness he doesn't like

05.10.2025 16:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wurman thinks it's fun to pal around with them, like when he took his little all expense paid trip to Hungary

05.10.2025 11:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Nope. Even by the standards of politicans--quite loose!--I can't recall anyone this desperate to be publicly validated or with thinner skin or quicker to the insult. Or quicker to change core beliefs for ambition's sake.

04.10.2025 21:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, although the media treatment of those kind of "I declare this unconstitutional" statements will be ridiculous. Every elected Dem is going to be made to answer questions about it, should say, a random house member make such a call.

04.10.2025 21:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Nice John Warner pic. I prefer Mark Warner.

03.10.2025 13:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Uhhh, you sure about that? It looks like a small horse to me

03.10.2025 11:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, possibly so out of practice in writing non-academic, they won't even try...lol

01.10.2025 19:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

They just get so used to doing it + many of them are rather inflexible people 🀷

01.10.2025 19:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Well done by Jeffries

I wouldn't be so sure he couldn't own the likes of you either

01.10.2025 00:08 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That's alot of pages. Don't know if I could swing it...

Sounds interesting though...

30.09.2025 23:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@bleerggg is following 20 prominent accounts