The standard response for a lot of progressives was to deflect from these issues so it's a good start.
28.02.2026 03:16 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@nickkodama.bsky.social
Fellow at MTA | PhD candidate at Georgetown | Researching nukes, IR, Japan, East Asia | Also posting photos of my cat and food.
The standard response for a lot of progressives was to deflect from these issues so it's a good start.
28.02.2026 03:16 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Progressives who haven't thought that much about natsec but have good advisers is how we win
28.02.2026 02:48 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0This is genuinely one of the best reasoned pieces of writing on US-Taiwan relations by anyone running for Congress Iโve seen in recent years. Even as someone who believes that strategic ambiguity has value in 2026.
Everyone, go check out @katmabu.bsky.social!
Who is advising Kat and how can we get them everywhere
28.02.2026 01:56 โ ๐ 35 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0oh no
28.02.2026 00:31 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Iran has ratified the NPT. That's not the issue here and it's insane that the person deciding whether we go to war doesn't understand that.
27.02.2026 23:49 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0ok
27.02.2026 22:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Secretary Hegseth announced this afternoon that DOD will cease ALL graduate study by military personnel at universities including MIT, all the Ivies, Stanford, etc because such schools teach "the enemy's wicked ideology" to officers.
thehill.com/policy/defen...
one time I said "it's INDOPACOVER" and someone called me a stupid canadian
27.02.2026 20:28 โ ๐ 29 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0kinda surprised we haven't yeeted more f-18s off of flight decks yet
27.02.2026 18:31 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0people should eat more organs/cheap cuts though and stop being so squeamish about them.
27.02.2026 17:27 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Tongue is good tho
27.02.2026 17:17 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0"most of the cheap cuts of meat are very inexpensive"
big if true
There is no amount of money in the world that would lead me to fight a Vietnamese refugee that grew up in Louisiana
(Also I really want to try a Korean style Poโ Boy)
We might go to war with Iran tomorrow, so whatโs the SECDEF up to?
The SECDEF:
transparency turning into target lists was always a dilemma but even more so now that we bombed them once and assembled what we need to do it again
27.02.2026 15:17 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0idk how we're supposed to negotiate a nuclear deal when anything the Iranians tell us about their facilities/material could be used to bomb them tomorrow
27.02.2026 15:14 โ ๐ 18 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I will inhale at the piano
27.02.2026 14:37 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The article mentions the vote coming up and ngl a lot of you would probably agree that up until then Dems have been weak on pushing back against war with Iran
27.02.2026 14:25 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I get to join the ensemble??
27.02.2026 14:22 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0tbf he does mention that
27.02.2026 14:19 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I heard it sucks
27.02.2026 14:15 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0This is now making the rounds and for all the wrong reasons. The apparent intelligence claim and the common criticism are both badly oversimplified.
An ICBM is in many ways extremely similar to an expendable space launch vehicle (rocket). Engineering and scale of velocity needed are very close.
Congrats to apparent sister cities Denton, TX, and Groton, CT, for going green or whatever
27.02.2026 04:50 โ ๐ 7 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So this is what it feels like when the TL is taken over by another country's politics
27.02.2026 04:39 โ ๐ 21 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 10.83x12=9.96
0.04 miles short, sorry no money.
27.02.2026 03:35 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0