👍
I guess we can both be assholes, together. Solidarity!
Funny, because when they said “lunch or storage” you focused on “storage”. So if I’m an asshole for focusing on a particular portion of their sentence; that would mean that…you’re an asshole, because you focused on a particular portion of their sentence.
Wait, so “reusable container” doesn’t include plastic containers?!? Who knew that every…single…plastic product was single use. Guess I’ll be throwing a bunch of items away
I’m relatively certain they said “reusable container”…yep, there it is!
I love how you said “almost” because, I have been in a supermarket…where the overwhelming majority of people will purposefully pick up the plastic-wrapped items, rather than loose ones right next to them.
Jean is correct, you don’t have to…it’s just so very convenient to.
You “don’t approve” when it suits you. When your convenience, pleasure, tradition, <insert excuse here> is impacted, then you’re more than happy to forget how much you “don’t approve” of climate change.
You’re like a smoker who moans about lung cancer.
Let’s not pretend that you give a damn about ”the health of the climate”. You’re more than happy to exacerbate climate change when it suits you.
Data centres don’t even near touch the emissions of animal agriculture.
You can’t even take your own “cause” seriously, yet you expect everyone else to accept it and fall in line.
You emit the way you like to emit, leave the rest of us to emit the way we like to emit without having to deal with your hypocritical moaning.
Does that include hypocritical carbon crybabies who are more than happy to destroy the climate and environment, when it suits them?
Let’s hold you to account as well. I’m sure you’ll try some bullshit excuse to “justify“ your choices...excuses that the other “climate destroyers“ can also use
I’d keep that finger of yours to yourself there, carbon crybaby.
You go ahead and emit the way you want to emit…leave everyone else to emit the way they want, without having to deal with your hypocritical whinging.
If you’re going to whinge about someone promoting polluting, climate changing products…make sure you’re not guilty of doing exactly the same thing, you absolute hypocrite.
You’re welcome to emit, but don’t hypocritically whinge about it when you choose to exacerbate it when it suits you...AND don’t try to remove my preferred emissions source.
Emit the way you want, allow the rest of us to do the same, without having to deal with your whining.
I don’t really care. I’m assuming you do and this individual definitely does…so exactly what stops them from walking down a different aisle at the store?!
I can use the exact same excuses you lot use to “justify” continued animal exploitation, to justify my fossil fuel emissions…and I do
This is probably the dumbest and most pathetic meme that you hypocritical carbon crybabies use to “justify” your deliberate choices...ESPECIALLY when you moan about the literal consequences of your deliberate choices.
You’re like a smoker complaining about lung cancer.
Quick, make an excuse for this hypocritical carbon crybaby’s deliberate choices!!
You’re not just participating 🤣🤣, you’re actively making the decision to emit. It’s not like anyone is stopping you from walking down a different aisle at the store.
Don’t get me wrong, I‘m happy to choose to fly, turn up my heating etc, but I don’t hypocritically whinge like you do.
You’re not whinging about climate change are you?!? Surely not when you’re more than happy to exacerbate it when it suits you.
I mean, if you are, you’re a massive hypocrite. You’re like a smoker complaining about lung cancer.
My politics don’t have nothing to do with your hypocrisy. Your hypocrisy is yours alone.
If you’re going to whine about someone’s choices…make sure you’re not doing the same thing.
I have absolutely no problem with that...and neither do you, it seems; otherwise you would refrain from exacerbating climate change when it suits you.
The convo began with me pointing out your hypocrisy. You’re no different from the republicans that you criticise, you just support a different form of emissions…either way, the end result is the same.
Oh, is that why you’re regurgitating it all over the place?
A response to inconsistent behaviour, leading to the exposing of your hypocrisy.
If you can‘t hold to your own “cause”, how can you expect anyone else to?
I feel the same about fossil fuel…and I’m talking about commercial, not private jets. You know? Friend of climate on earth and exacerbate some of it, as tax!
You emit the way you want to emit; leave everyone else to emit the way they want to emit without having to deal with your whinging.
Perhaps they think that fossil fuel on a small scale is acceptable. Sure, it scales out massively when every person’s small scale is taken into account…but it’s no different from your argument for animal agriculture.
I’d suggest you sort out your own yard before you start pointing at others.
Done, now you can happily fly away.
You’ve proven to fit exactly the premise I made from the get go, which YOU engaged me on.
YOU engaged me, not the other way around! I’ll flag you right back.
WAIT!!! Are you trying to reference Maslow?!? 🤣🤣
NO ONE “needs” animal products…and again, there is NOTHING mutual about dominating and exploiting animals.
Do all vegans a favour and piss off; you’re not vegan. You’re an embarrassment.
…answer the question and I wouldn’t need to presume, but it seems you like to use the MAGA playbook; I guess it ensures that you can maintain your little bubble.
I did, it’s extremely terse. There‘s absolutely nothing in it showing that beekeeping isn’t exploitative; in fact there’s no mention of the practices employed to ensure that honey bees stay put. I’m guessing you’re just regurgitating bullshit about an industry you have no knowledge of.
