Me, after debunking learning styles and offering people a better way to differentiate instruction: youtube.com/shorts/e-BFj...
Hope you find that introduction article helpful! @mattbernacki.bsky.social did a heck of a job with that article and his guest editorship of the entire special issue.
Totally agree. This makes me think of Cizek's "consequential validity" idea (ie consequences of assessment evidence should be considered as part of the argument for validity) & how learning analytics can be leveraged to assess in different ways. Here's an SI on it: www.apa.org/pubs/journal...
Could #GenAI find dynamic, non-linear, and/or complex systems patterns across diverse data types, aggregrating them in ways that are impossible using traditional "modern measurement theory" methods? Will power analysis become moot? These are the kinds of questions I'm asking. What are yours? (3/3)
This distinction is helpful. Don't ask what parts of a task #GenAI will replace, ask what tasks GenAI will make irrelevant. For example, I don't think GenAI can replace researchers who actually talk to people, choose research questions, collect data, etc. But, could it replace measurement? (2/3)
"Oks emphasizes the distinction between automation and irrelevance, which is the point where most people get stuck: it’s easy to visualize a world where your job has been automated, but really hard to visualize one where your job is irrelevant because the entire ground has transformed." (1/3)
“The platforms use aggressive tactics to keep users compulsively engaged — algorithmic recommendations, infinite scroll, auto video play and intermittent reinforcement…This goes far beyond merely hosting and moderating third-party content.” [Gift link] www.nytimes.com/2026/03/14/o...
Thanks for clarifying. That wasn’t what I meant. Good to be explicit about that now. I wasn’t positioning one as totally good and the other totally bad.
Sorry, I don't understand your comment.
Excellent example of how important it is to differentiate AI methods from GenAI. The former have been around what , 50 years? And been used well and safely with proper oversight.
Great episode. I really appreciated the focus on measurement. We need to do a much better job measuring and investigating our modeling of phenomena. Garbage measure in, garbage findings out.
Great question! Unclear but if I had to bet I’d say phones increase attentional issues in those who currently lack tools for attention regulation.
Oof. Objective data showing way too much smartphone use during school. I'm less compelled by the lab-based, artificial measure of cognitive control, but directionally the findings (more use -> poorer control) are concerning. #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
Great article describing SGA’s miraculous achievement: “In other words, the chances of a modern NBA All-Star surpassing Chamberlain's streak are roughly the odds of finding a specific grain of sand somewhere on the entire planet.”
I'm a fan of design-based research and how it is deeply situated and also collaborative with (in this case) teachers and students. Seems like digital literacy is shifting every month, now, so we need more research like this into what students are actually doing. #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky
And just to be clear: the linked article describes the flaws in the literature. It is not a meta-analysis.
We are rapidly approaching the "can't swing a tetherball without hitting one" number of meta-analyses of #GenAI effects on learning. Perhaps we should do better primary research on that topic before trying, yet again, to meta-analyze a bunch of flawed studies? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
...I believe we should always start with the learning objectives and then ask if technology could measurably improve students' capability of achieving them. And, broadly, I like the AAP's 5C's approach to these decisions. www.aap.org/en/patient-c...
The debate about screen time for very young children is important and I'm glad it is getting coverage. I don't think technology is inherently bad or good for young children, but its use should be very limited and intentional...(1/2) www.nytimes.com/2026/03/10/n...
I'm a fan of design-based research and how it is deeply situated and also collaborative with (in this case) teachers and students. Seems like digital literacy is shifting every month, now, so we need more research like this into what students are actually doing. #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky
Can I be both deeply worried about teachers using #GenAI to grade student work and also deeply empathetic about how overworked our teachers are and their desire for solutions to that long-standing problem? Because I am. [Gift link]
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/o...
“Kids don’t need to learn prompt engineering or proficiency with a never-ending menu of commercial AI tools. They need a holistic understanding of AI — not only what it can do in the moment, but also how it works and how it affects learning.” (1/2) wapo.st/3P8SyEX
Encouraging findings that teacher-led sourcing and corroboration strategy instruction can enhance 7th and 8th grade students' sourcing ability and metastrategic knowledge about sourcing when working with text-based online material. #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky
Encouraging findings that teacher-led sourcing and corroboration strategy instruction can enhance 7th and 8th grade students' sourcing ability and metastrategic knowledge about sourcing when working with text-based online material. #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky
I agree with the focus on teaching students how AI works and gaining agency with it, but I wish these articles would differentiate #GenAI from machine learning and other data science techniques. They are meaningfully different. (2/2)
“Kids don’t need to learn prompt engineering or proficiency with a never-ending menu of commercial AI tools. They need a holistic understanding of AI — not only what it can do in the moment, but also how it works and how it affects learning.” (1/2) wapo.st/3P8SyEX
Yup: "Promoting healthier digital engagement will require coordinated efforts across ecological levels, including family practices (eg, coviewing media), school-based digital literacy, regulatory oversight of industry, and..." #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky (1/2) jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
I'd love to see more institutions trying new ways to support student success and then tracking effects over time, as Georgia State University has done.
You ever write something and there are so many parts you hope people engage with that you can't figure out which ones to quote?
I'll do a wee thread on the 3rd, and final, essay from my Red Scares series
www.insidehighered.com/opinion/colu...
"...attention to cultural values and the evolving platforms. Future research should also prioritize precise, ecologically valid measurement of digital media engagement..." (2/2)