Michael E. Mann's Avatar

Michael E. Mann

@michaelemann.bsky.social

Scientist/Author/Speaker; Presidential Distinguished Prof/Director Center for Science, Sustainability & the Media, U. Penn; National Academy of Sciences; Royal Society; Tyler Prize

95,426 Followers  |  516 Following  |  5,698 Posts  |  Joined: 12.04.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Michael E. Mann (@michaelemann.bsky.social)

Look Mr @michaelemann.bsky.social

A hockey stick graph.

I bet the powers that be take this one more seriously.

09.03.2026 00:26 β€” πŸ‘ 51    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
A deadly climate change effect is even worse than feared, study finds Sea level along the world’s coastlines is often much higher than previously assumed, a new study finds.

"A deadly climate change effect is even worse than feared, study finds" by Doyle Rice for @usatoday.com: www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...

08.03.2026 22:13 β€” πŸ‘ 96    πŸ” 47    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
AI error or not, Iran school bombing is a permanent stain on America’s soul | Will Bunch A debate on AI in warfare obscures the truth about an Iran school bombing. U.S. humans are to blame for this war crime.

They had names. They had beautiful faces. And they had the same dreams as your kids - crushed when American "precision" bombs slammed into their Minab elementary school, killing 175

Don't blame AI for this. Blame the sick humans who see war as a game

My new column www.inquirer.com/opinion/iran...

08.03.2026 18:37 β€” πŸ‘ 5102    πŸ” 1817    πŸ’¬ 119    πŸ“Œ 78

0.35C is not defensible. See:
bsky.app/profile/mich...

07.03.2026 23:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Via @wacswain.bsky.social
β€œRoyal Society statement on the US Administration’s repeal of the endangerment finding”

07.03.2026 19:37 β€” πŸ‘ 90    πŸ” 39    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

Thanks Eric!

07.03.2026 19:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And: bsky.app/profile/mich...

07.03.2026 18:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Matt, this comparison is informative β€” it shows the observations along with the spread among the CMIP6 ensemble: bsky.app/profile/mich...

07.03.2026 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘πŸ™‚

07.03.2026 18:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Bob, I already said I’m done debating this with you here.

07.03.2026 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t follow. Annual emissions are roughly constant at about 38 Gt CO2 which means cumulative emissions are increasing roughly linearly. There are some indications that annual emissions will decline over next few years which would mean a deceleration in cumulative emissions.

07.03.2026 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I'll have to reach out to Tapio and ask him if there's any followup work by him or others he's aware of.

07.03.2026 16:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Way Donald Trump Talks About Americans Dying Should Enrage You The Way He Talks About Americans Dying Should Enrage You

The Way Donald Trump Talks About Americans Dying Should Enrage You
open.substack.com/pub/thejackh...

07.03.2026 15:47 β€” πŸ‘ 69    πŸ” 32    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

oops, sorry, I was looking at the IOP article. I'm very familiar w/ Tapio's @nature.com article. In fact, I discus it at length in #OurFragileMoment (bookshop.org/p/books/our-...). Here's an excerpt:

07.03.2026 15:38 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

oops, sorry, I was looking at the IOP article. I'm very familiar w/ Tapio's @nature.com article. In fact, I discus it at length in #OurFragileMoment (bookshop.org/p/books/our-...). Here's an excerpt:

07.03.2026 15:38 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

🧡

07.03.2026 14:48 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

hadn't seen this one, but I've long been impressed with Tapio's work. I'll read it! Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

07.03.2026 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Dr. Mann's reference to Dr. Schneider has particular resonance with me (b/c I knew him a bit). He emphasized the need to follow the data; he had long talked about overestimating aerosols & underestimating CO2 impacts but bad actors pretended he had not changed his mind in only 3 yrs (71 to 74).

07.03.2026 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Bob, the plot is literally what I'm saying. And it speaks for itself. Signing off on this exchange as I don't think further back-and-forth is productive here.

07.03.2026 14:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘πŸ™‚ I always appreciate good faith challenges and questioning. It's refreshing!

07.03.2026 14:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

No disagreement there. In practice, though, the two are nearly equivalent:

07.03.2026 14:28 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

No disagreement there. In practice, though, the two are nearly equivalent:

07.03.2026 14:28 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Scientists are trying to solve the mystery of whether global warming is speeding up. A new study says it has the answer | CNN Is the world getting hotter, faster? It’s a big question which has been puzzling and dividing scientists for years. A new paper says it has the answer, and it’s not good news.

"Scientists are trying to solve the mystery of whether global warming is speeding up" via @laurapaddison.bsky.social for @cnn.com. [I'm critical of the study, but we all agree on key point that planet will continue to warm until we stop burning fossil fuels]: www.cnn.com/2026/03/06/c...

06.03.2026 18:30 β€” πŸ‘ 185    πŸ” 61    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 7
Post image

From "Our Fragile Moment"

07.03.2026 02:52 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Michael Mann: Yes, we can still stop the worst effects of climate change. Here's why. Opinion: State-of-the-art climate models show warming stops once we stop emitting carbon. That means there's still time to stop the worst impacts of climate change.

Please see this commentary I wrote for @livescience.com that summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the "zero emissions commitment" (how much warming we expect once emissions decrease to zero). Our best estimate is that the ZEC is very close to 0C:
www.livescience.com/planet-earth...

07.03.2026 14:25 β€” πŸ‘ 31    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
Michael Mann: Yes, we can still stop the worst effects of climate change. Here's why. Opinion: State-of-the-art climate models show warming stops once we stop emitting carbon. That means there's still time to stop the worst impacts of climate change.

Please see this commentary I wrote for @livescience.com that summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the "zero emissions commitment" (how much warming we expect once emissions decrease to zero). Our best estimate is that the ZEC is very close to 0C:
www.livescience.com/planet-earth...

07.03.2026 14:25 β€” πŸ‘ 31    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

It's important that scientists get this stuff--and in particular, the messaging to the public--right. And social media is a primary way that scientists interact w/ each other today. We're going to be in this space, that's simply a fact. Let's use it to communicate knowledge as best we can.

07.03.2026 14:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Some comments on John Kennedy (the climate scientist, not the ex-president)'s post (a post with which I largely agree!) 🧡
1. Nobody familiar w/ my views could "everything is consistent with existing model projections". Even Gemini knows my views are far more nuanced:

07.03.2026 13:38 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Once again, there’s promotion of the *idea* that it’s all about seizing oil assets even when there’s not much of a case for it

07.03.2026 14:05 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 3

IMHO it clearly shows observations lie entirely within multimodel ensemble spread, which collectively (see multimodel mean) show no acceleration over past two decades. Rather than debating this further on social media, I'll speak to this further in the peer-reviewed literature. Watch this space.

07.03.2026 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0