Mathias Sablé-Meyer's Avatar

Mathias Sablé-Meyer

@mathiassablemeyer.bsky.social

Postdoc working on human cognition about abstract concepts at the SWC, London. Cog/comp-(neuro)scientist wannabe; adequate climber.

226 Followers  |  78 Following  |  19 Posts  |  Joined: 18.12.2024  |  1.5065

Latest posts by mathiassablemeyer.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

*Multi-region computations in the brain*
When two regions are better than one...
doi.org/10.1016/j.ne...
#neuroskyence

23.01.2026 18:14 — 👍 50    🔁 14    💬 2    📌 0

If you have ever wondered what happens in your brain when you look at those scatterplots from your research data (hoping to find a significant correlation!)... check our paper out !

22.01.2026 22:03 — 👍 6    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

At @elife.bsky.social you can now include explainer videos with every figure. Like going to a seminar while you engage with the paper. First example here elifesciences.org/articles/106...

Click the arrows next to each figure to get a video of @mathiassablemeyer.bsky.social explaining it for you!

22.01.2026 18:16 — 👍 107    🔁 22    💬 3    📌 6
GitHub - mathias-sm/AGeometricShapeRegularityEffectHumanBrain Contribute to mathias-sm/AGeometricShapeRegularityEffectHumanBrain development by creating an account on GitHub.

The code for the analyses is at github.com/mathias-sm/AGeometricShapeRegularityEffectHumanBrain, the fMRI data is at openneuro.org/datasets/ds0... and the MEG data at openneuro.org/datasets/ds0...
If you're looking into it and missing anything, ping me!

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I want to thank all the people (+fundings) behind the open-source projects that saved me countless hours during this project @scikit-learn.org @nilearn.bsky.social MNE fmriprep BIDS @openneuro.bsky.social the entire free-software stack that supports science.
You’re awesome.

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
A language of thought for the mental representation of geometric shapes In various cultures and at all spatial scales, humans produce a rich complexity of geometric shapes such as lines, circles or spirals. Here, we propos…

We find that after visual processing, the mere perception of a geometric shape induces a representation based on exact geometric features. We connect this to work on a Language of Thought where perception triggers a reverse engineering of the shape's "program": www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

We compare many models: various layers of CNNs, various neural network architectures, models based on shape skeletons or on lexical access to shape names, etc. In fMRI, we also zoom in on both ventral areas and areas previously identified as math-responsive.

And there'll be more—stay 📈 𝒯𝓊𝓃𝑒𝒹 📉!

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

During passive shape perception in MEG in adults, we find dissociation in space and time between two models of geometric shape perception. Early visual activity resembles bottom-up perception as embodied by a CNN. Subsequent parieto-frontal activity is best explained by geometric features.

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

In a simple fMRI visual localiser, with no task, comparing single shapes to other single visual categories (faces, tools, houses) elicits an under-activation of the visual pathways. It also elicits an over-activation of (right) IPS in adults and children, close to typical math-responsive areas.

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

First, the behaviour: when faced with finding an intruder within quadrilaterals, the accuracy and response time of humans vary a lot and are well predicted by the exact geometric features of the shapes—more so than by their visual features embodied in a neural network.

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Thanks to @lucaswbenjamin.bsky.social @cassandrapw.bsky.social @maxencepajot.bsky.social @theomorfoisse.bsky.social Fosca al Roumi @standehaene.bsky.social; reviewers, editors; labs I was in at some point @unicog.bsky.social @sainsburywellcome.bsky.social and @fondationfyssen.bsky.social's funding

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Excited to see this Version Of Record of my work out in @elife.bsky.social!
elifesciences.org/articles/106...
We investigate the mental representation of geometric shapes in adults and children using fMRI and MEG. Each figure has a video of me explaining the figure: go and read it, or read below.

22.01.2026 18:29 — 👍 22    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 2

Amazing! We intentionally stayed away from motor tasks and representations, but it's exciting to see this convergence. Just in case, I'll also send this to Lucas Tian (not on bsky), who has to rely on explicit tracing for his own project–but ultimately cares about abstract shape representation!

24.12.2025 11:50 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Thread of French and Dutch research institutes slowly unsubscribing from web of science (and thence impact factors).

03.12.2025 06:53 — 👍 78    🔁 35    💬 2    📌 6
Preview
Cognitive Maps in the Prefrontal Cortex The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is critical for our ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt our behavior in new environments based on our previous experience. Despite its importance, the neural substrates a...

1/ Excited to share that our symposium review covering cognitive mapping in the PFC just came out in the Journal of Neuroscience: www.jneurosci.org/content/45/4...

15.11.2025 18:03 — 👍 9    🔁 9    💬 1    📌 2
Post image

Will you be at #SfN25? Stop by the Sainsbury Wellcome Centre’s posters and talks! @sfn.org

14.11.2025 16:00 — 👍 10    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Also check out our review accompanying the symposium here: doi.org/10.1523/JNEU...
With Sebastijan Veselic, Elena Gutierrez, @melgaby.bsky.social @sandra-neuro.bsky.social @mathiassablemeyer.bsky.social

14.11.2025 04:48 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 1
Post image

Come join us at #SfN25 for the minisymposium "Cognitive Maps in the Prefrontal Cortex"!
Saturday, Nov 15, 2:00-4:30pm, Room SDCC 6CF
www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/21171...
We will explore how the PFC represents structured relationships across species and how this supports flexible behavior.

14.11.2025 04:48 — 👍 26    🔁 8    💬 1    📌 2
Video thumbnail

I’m super excited to finally put my recent work with @behrenstimb.bsky.social on bioRxiv, where we develop a new mechanistic theory of how PFC structures adaptive behaviour using attractor dynamics in space and time!

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

24.09.2025 09:52 — 👍 219    🔁 86    💬 9    📌 9

The heartbreaking thing about this
is that there’s already a proven way
to invest lots of money in a knowledge machine
that produces unforeseeable results
that include fantastically profitable ideas
(and some life-saving ones)
and generally benefit society
and this machine is called
a university

19.08.2025 17:33 — 👍 109    🔁 45    💬 5    📌 1
Post image

Confidence in absence as confidence in counterfactual visibility: a CogSci proceedings paper with star MSc student Maya Schipper, is now out on PsyArXiv:

osf.io/preprints/ps...

🧵👇

23.07.2025 03:23 — 👍 56    🔁 18    💬 3    📌 0

Anyone with a WSJ subscription & app can check whether that summary appears in anything actually written by WSJ? Somehow I would find it even more fitting/absurd if this was an AI-powered notification summary.
www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chat...

21.07.2025 12:12 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Open science initiatives have gained traction in recent years. However, open peer-review practices, i.e., reforms that (i) modify the identifiability of stakeholders and (ii) establish channels for the open communication of information between stakeholders, have seen very little adoption in economics. In this paper, we explore the feasibility and desirability of such reforms. We present insights derived from survey data documenting the attitudes of 802 experimental/behavioral economists, a conceptual framework, a literature review, and cross-disciplinary data on current journal practices. On (i), most respondents support preserving anonymity for referees, but views about anonymity for authors and associate editors are mixed. On (ii), most respondents are open to publishing anonymized referee reports, sharing reports between referees, and allowing authors to appeal editorial decisions. Active reviewers, editors, and respondents from the US/Canada are generally less open to transparency reforms.

Open science initiatives have gained traction in recent years. However, open peer-review practices, i.e., reforms that (i) modify the identifiability of stakeholders and (ii) establish channels for the open communication of information between stakeholders, have seen very little adoption in economics. In this paper, we explore the feasibility and desirability of such reforms. We present insights derived from survey data documenting the attitudes of 802 experimental/behavioral economists, a conceptual framework, a literature review, and cross-disciplinary data on current journal practices. On (i), most respondents support preserving anonymity for referees, but views about anonymity for authors and associate editors are mixed. On (ii), most respondents are open to publishing anonymized referee reports, sharing reports between referees, and allowing authors to appeal editorial decisions. Active reviewers, editors, and respondents from the US/Canada are generally less open to transparency reforms.

New survey of 802 experimental/behavioral economists finds:

(a) most support preserving anonymity for referees

(b) most are open to publishing anonymized referee reports

Preprint: osf.io/preprints/me...

By @danieljevans.bsky.social, @adam-gill.bsky.social, et al.

18.07.2025 12:03 — 👍 18    🔁 5    💬 2    📌 0

It was really great to meet and work with @maxencepajot.bsky.social as he was trailblazing this—congrats!! 👏

Takeaways: you can predict number frequencies in books by thinking of numbers as programs, testing mental representation ideas from doi.org/10.1016/j.ti...

See Maxence's great thread below👇

16.07.2025 13:15 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Redirecting

Some numbers seem to show up everywhere. Think of 10, 12, 24, 36...
Others—like 26 or 34—don’t get the same attention.Why? In our new paper with @standehaene.bsky.social and @mathiassablemeyer.bsky.social, we argue it's because of how the mind builds number concepts.
🧵
doi.org/10.1016/j.co...

15.07.2025 15:57 — 👍 32    🔁 10    💬 2    📌 1
Preview
Signez la pétition Sauvons le Palais de la découverte

Retour d'une vieille rengaine: étouffer le palais de la découverte pour justifier son unification avec la cité des sciences et de l'industrie. Curiosité scientifique ≠ fascination technologique; ces institutions ont des rôles très distincts!

Signalez votre soutien www.change.org/p/sauvons-le...

16.06.2025 14:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

Second night of #pint25 was really fun 🧠🍻 @nadinedijkstra.bsky.social and @matanmazor.bsky.social gave spectacular talks and we couldn't stop the audience from asking questions—nor did we want to.
Can’t wait for tonight, grab your ticket and join us!

21.05.2025 09:55 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 1
Post image

Pr. Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh explaining "How Can Large Language Models Become More Human?" to a captivated audience.
#pint25 has started; it's great fun to see it come together! Join our "Beautiful Mind" theme at The George IV in Chiswick, or any other fascinating topics featured in pintofscience.co.uk

19.05.2025 20:06 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Origins of numbers: a shared language-of-thought for arithmetic and geometry? Concepts of exact number are often thought to originate from counting and the successor function, or from a refinement of the approximate number system (ANS). We argue here for a third origin: a shared language-of-thought (LoT) for geometry and arithmetic that involves primitives of repetition, concatenation, and recursive embedding. Applied to sets, those primitives engender concepts of exact integers through recursive applications of additions and multiplications. Links between geometry and arithmetic also explain the emergence of higher-level notions (squares, primes, etc.). Under our hypothesis, understanding a number means having one or several mental expressions for it, and their minimal description length (MDL) determines how easily they can be mentally manipulated. Several historical, developmental, linguistic, and brain imaging phenomena provide preliminary support for our proposal.

Online Now: Origins of numbers: a shared language-of-thought for arithmetic and geometry?

15.04.2025 12:41 — 👍 9    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 1
Post image

We're bringing together leading researchers from top institutions worldwide to Split, Croatia this summer. If you're passionate about brain-inspired AI, computational neuroscience, or fundamental mathematical principles driving intelligence, this conference is the place to be!

01.04.2025 13:23 — 👍 32    🔁 9    💬 2    📌 0

@mathiassablemeyer is following 20 prominent accounts