Walz: If you say you love freedom but you don't believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love is not freedom, it is privilege.
24.04.2025 00:22 β π 79518 π 20357 π¬ 841 π 1264@jasondbarrons.bsky.social
Product Designer and thoroughly fed up with the DNC. Will engage with right-wing folks in good faith only.
Walz: If you say you love freedom but you don't believe freedom is for everybody, then the thing you love is not freedom, it is privilege.
24.04.2025 00:22 β π 79518 π 20357 π¬ 841 π 1264Just not tatooine, not ever again.
21.04.2025 17:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0But but but he said 'billionaires, ''Elon musk, ' and 'DOGE. '
He can only do so much! He can't let trump win and thus his only option is to let trump win
Jabber jaw jabbers at length. Sure, let's give him a record for it and pretend it's newsworthy
05.03.2025 18:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0To go a step farther than your article, the first AI research at Dartmouth proposed they could make AGI in a summer.
Its wild how consistently bad theyve been at this.
Which is why y'all should leave during the speech.
Why do we once again let them play the game they want to play?
Proton mail and proton drive. Not perfect, but worth the monthly fee.
04.03.2025 20:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Or they could do what jeffries suggests, which is to attend and be nice because that's the 'bold' thing to do. π
04.03.2025 15:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I legitimately have been hoping a documentary would be made on just how in the world they made something so shitty in every aspect of software development.
04.03.2025 06:15 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@aoc.bsky.social, any insight as to why dems think doing the same thing as every previous year is the bold and brave thing to do at the SOTU?
04.03.2025 00:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Jeffries needs to go. He is not equipped for this moment.
03.03.2025 23:54 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It can inspire innovation but you don't simply wish for a Dyson Sphere to be manifest just because we read about it in a book.
Same with AI. Same with robots. Same with Mars.  
Silicon Valley has this really immature view that you can simply code anything into existence.
I find it embarrassing that these guys think they can will science fiction into existence.
Especially while murdering fundamental research.
I just checked in. You're right. They did! Something actually good came out of last year.
03.03.2025 03:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It still breaks my heart, that private equity got their fingers into the LMO.
03.03.2025 03:51 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Trumps feefees were hurt by both France and the UK correcting him in front of the press.
So he did what any bully does - found someone smaller to punch down at.
That's what this was about today. Removing the shame of being corrected by greater men than him.
How small.
They should show up.
And then collectively all walk out.
At this point, I'm going with the death cult option.
I don't know how you can light this much money on fire and then do anything other than a suicide run. 
 Every tech CEO's head will figuratively roll if they pull back at all.
My copium is that we welcome people who were genuinely deceived.  We bring people in who can admit their mistake.
The rest we'll deal with at the end of all of this during their trials.
Oh, I feel your frustration. It's hard being on the side of things that consistently has integrity and thus consistently is expected to maintain integrity.
27.02.2025 23:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think we have to remember that not everyone who voted for trump is a MAGA devotee, even if they are conservative.
We aren't going to get a decisive majority to take back the country from these nuts with 51% of the population behind us - we need 60, 70, maybe even 80%.
Kind of like how UHC's AI gets claim rejections wrong 90% of the time, but as long as it's rejecting lots of people, it's still doing exactly what they want.
26.02.2025 21:58 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0The left isn't the problem, but that doesn't mean they're the solution.
With Dems thinking 2026 will be a cakewalk, I'm done with this passive strategy of "just want until people hate Republicans again."  
Indivisible is starting to sound like the name of a great pro-democracy party to me.
What other Democrats don't understand is that when we tell them we want them to do something, THIS is what we're talking about.
We're gonna have to get rid of all of them next cycle. I'm tired of relying on the actions of Republican bad actors to win back anything. No more ping pong.
The best thing Google AI has ever done is gotten me to actually enjoy using DuckDuckGo.
It might not be as good as Google at its peak, but it's definitely better than Google now.
Very much reads like a " I always meant to do that, " kind of statement.
AI wasn't a bad idea, it just saved us so much money that we can now hire people to do the job that AI replaced people to do!
I find it grating that their end-of-america plan is so fucking cringe, because it makes it so much harder to get people to believe these 'geniuses' think a bunch of fascist city states won't devour each other within a decade.
17.02.2025 23:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0All you need to do is educate yourself on how to ask those right questions...which will just end up educating yourself to the same level as those experts you're trying to bypass.
17.02.2025 23:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I'm  considering starting a change.org petition where the signers pledge not to donate one cent to Democrats until:
1. Super delegates are abolished.
2. Seniority rules are revoked wholesale.
3. Dark money and larger donors are banned from primaries.
When free speech = nazi slogans to you, this all makes sense.
I very much doubt that North Korean law says anything about nazi branding and slogans for instance.   Being critical of dear leader might get you killed, but let's not forget that free speech only deals with nazis, not dear leaders.